linux-toradex.git/kernel/bpf, branch v5.0-rc8

bpf, lpm: fix lookup bug in map_delete_elem

2019-02-22T15:17:53+00:00

trie_delete_elem() was deleting an entry even though it was not matching
if the prefixlen was correct. This patch adds a check on matchlen.

Reproducer:

$ sudo bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm type lpm_trie key 8 value 1 entries 128 name mylpm flags 1
$ sudo bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key hex 10 00 00 00 aa bb cc dd value hex 01
$ sudo bpftool map dump pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm
key: 10 00 00 00 aa bb cc dd  value: 01
Found 1 element
$ sudo bpftool map delete pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key hex 10 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff
$ echo $?
0
$ sudo bpftool map dump pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm
Found 0 elements

A similar reproducer is added in the selftests.

Without the patch:

$ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map
test_lpm_map: test_lpm_map.c:485: test_lpm_delete: Assertion `bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && errno == ENOENT' failed.
Aborted

With the patch: test_lpm_map runs without errors.

Fixes: e454cf595853 ("bpf: Implement map_delete_elem for BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE")
Cc: Craig Gallek 
Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy 
Acked-by: Craig Gallek 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix lockdep false positive in stackmap

2019-02-11T15:36:24+00:00

Lockdep warns about false positive:
[   11.211460] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   11.211936] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0)
[   11.211985] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 141 at ../kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3592 lock_release+0x1ad/0x280
[   11.213134] Modules linked in:
[   11.214954] RIP: 0010:lock_release+0x1ad/0x280
[   11.223508] Call Trace:
[   11.223705]  
[   11.223874]  ? __local_bh_enable+0x7a/0x80
[   11.224199]  up_read+0x1c/0xa0
[   11.224446]  do_up_read+0x12/0x20
[   11.224713]  irq_work_run_list+0x43/0x70
[   11.225030]  irq_work_run+0x26/0x50
[   11.225310]  smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x57/0x1f0
[   11.225662]  irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20

since rw_semaphore is released in a different task vs task that locked the sema.
It is expected behavior.
Fix the warning with up_read_non_owner() and rwsem_release() annotation.

Fixes: bae77c5eb5b2 ("bpf: enable stackmap with build_id in nmi context")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Fix narrow load on a bpf_sock returned from sk_lookup()

2019-02-10T03:57:22+00:00

By adding this test to test_verifier:
{
	"reference tracking: access sk->src_ip4 (narrow load)",
	.insns = {
	BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4) + 2),
	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
	},
	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
	.result = ACCEPT,
},

The above test loads 2 bytes from sk->src_ip4 where
sk is obtained by bpf_sk_lookup_tcp().

It hits an internal verifier error from convert_ctx_accesses():
[root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_verifier 665 665
Failed to load prog 'Invalid argument'!
0: (b7) r2 = 0
1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r2
2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r2
3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -24) = r2
4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r2
5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r2
6: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -48) = r2
7: (bf) r2 = r10
8: (07) r2 += -48
9: (b7) r3 = 36
10: (b7) r4 = 0
11: (b7) r5 = 0
12: (85) call bpf_sk_lookup_tcp#84
13: (bf) r6 = r0
14: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+3
 R0=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R6=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????0000 fp-16=0000mmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm fp-48=mmmmmmmm refs=1
15: (69) r2 = *(u16 *)(r0 +26)
16: (bf) r1 = r6
17: (85) call bpf_sk_release#86
18: (95) exit

from 14 to 18: safe
processed 20 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 48
bpf verifier is misconfigured
Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

The bpf_sock_is_valid_access() is expecting src_ip4 can be narrowly
loaded (meaning load any 1 or 2 bytes of the src_ip4) by
marking info->ctx_field_size.  However, this marked
ctx_field_size is not used.  This patch fixes it.

Due to the recent refactoring in test_verifier,
this new test will be added to the bpf-next branch
(together with the bpf_tcp_sock patchset)
to avoid merge conflict.

Fixes: c64b7983288e ("bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type")
Cc: Joe Stringer 
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Acked-by: Joe Stringer 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Fix syscall's stackmap lookup potential deadlock

2019-01-31T22:18:21+00:00

The map_lookup_elem used to not acquiring spinlock
in order to optimize the reader.

It was true until commit 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation")
The syscall's map_lookup_elem(stackmap) calls bpf_stackmap_copy().
bpf_stackmap_copy() may find the elem no longer needed after the copy is done.
If that is the case, pcpu_freelist_push() saves this elem for reuse later.
This push requires a spinlock.

If a tracing bpf_prog got run in the middle of the syscall's
map_lookup_elem(stackmap) and this tracing bpf_prog is calling
bpf_get_stackid(stackmap) which also requires the same pcpu_freelist's
spinlock, it may end up with a dead lock situation as reported by
Eric Dumazet in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1030266/

The situation is the same as the syscall's map_update_elem() which
needs to acquire the pcpu_freelist's spinlock and could race
with tracing bpf_prog.  Hence, this patch fixes it by protecting
bpf_stackmap_copy() with this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active)
to prevent tracing bpf_prog from running.

A later syscall's map_lookup_elem commit f1a2e44a3aec ("bpf: add queue and stack maps")
also acquires a spinlock and races with tracing bpf_prog similarly.
Hence, this patch is forward looking and protects the majority
of the map lookups.  bpf_map_offload_lookup_elem() is the exception
since it is for network bpf_prog only (i.e. never called by tracing
bpf_prog).

Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix lockdep false positive in percpu_freelist

2019-01-31T22:18:21+00:00

Lockdep warns about false positive:
[   12.492084] 00000000e6b28347 (&head->lock){+...}, at: pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40
[   12.492696] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
[   12.493275]  (&rq->lock){-.-.}
[   12.493276]
[   12.493276]
[   12.493276] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
[   12.493276]
[   12.494435]
[   12.494435] other info that might help us debug this:
[   12.494979]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[   12.494979]
[   12.495518]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   12.495879]        ----                    ----
[   12.496243]   lock(&head->lock);
[   12.496502]                                local_irq_disable();
[   12.496969]                                lock(&rq->lock);
[   12.497431]                                lock(&head->lock);
[   12.497890]   
[   12.498104]     lock(&rq->lock);
[   12.498368]
[   12.498368]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   12.498368]
[   12.498837] 1 lock held by dd/276:
[   12.499110]  #0: 00000000c58cb2ee (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: trace_call_bpf+0x5e/0x240
[   12.499747]
[   12.499747] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock:
[   12.500389]  -> (&rq->lock){-.-.} {
[   12.500669]     IN-HARDIRQ-W at:
[   12.500934]                       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
[   12.501373]                       scheduler_tick+0x4c/0xf0
[   12.501812]                       update_process_times+0x40/0x50
[   12.502294]                       tick_periodic+0x27/0xb0
[   12.502723]                       tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x60
[   12.503203]                       timer_interrupt+0x11/0x20
[   12.503651]                       __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0
[   12.504167]                       handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x50
[   12.504674]                       handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60
[   12.505139]                       handle_level_irq+0xa7/0x120
[   12.505601]                       handle_irq+0xa1/0x150
[   12.506018]                       do_IRQ+0x77/0x140
[   12.506411]                       ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d
[   12.506834]                       _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x53/0x60
[   12.507362]                       __setup_irq+0x481/0x730
[   12.507789]                       setup_irq+0x49/0x80
[   12.508195]                       hpet_time_init+0x21/0x32
[   12.508644]                       x86_late_time_init+0xb/0x16
[   12.509106]                       start_kernel+0x390/0x42a
[   12.509554]                       secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[   12.510034]     IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
[   12.510305]                       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
[   12.510772]                       try_to_wake_up+0x1c7/0x4e0
[   12.511220]                       swake_up_locked+0x20/0x40
[   12.511657]                       swake_up_one+0x1a/0x30
[   12.512070]                       rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5/0x650
[   12.512553]                       __do_softirq+0xe6/0x47b
[   12.512978]                       irq_exit+0xc3/0xd0
[   12.513372]                       smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa9/0x250
[   12.513876]                       apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
[   12.514343]                       default_idle+0x1c/0x170
[   12.514765]                       do_idle+0x199/0x240
[   12.515159]                       cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20
[   12.515614]                       start_kernel+0x422/0x42a
[   12.516045]                       secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[   12.516521]     INITIAL USE at:
[   12.516774]                      _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x50
[   12.517258]                      rq_attach_root+0x16/0xd0
[   12.517685]                      sched_init+0x2f2/0x3eb
[   12.518096]                      start_kernel+0x1fb/0x42a
[   12.518525]                      secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[   12.518986]   }
[   12.519132]   ... key      at: [] __key.71384+0x0/0x8
[   12.519649]   ... acquired at:
[   12.519892]    pcpu_freelist_pop+0x7b/0xd0
[   12.520221]    bpf_get_stackid+0x1d2/0x4d0
[   12.520563]    ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0
[   12.520887]
[   12.521008] -> (&head->lock){+...} {
[   12.521292]    HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
[   12.521539]                     _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
[   12.521950]                     pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40
[   12.522396]                     bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0
[   12.522828]                     ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0
[   12.523296]    INITIAL USE at:
[   12.523537]                    _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
[   12.523944]                    pcpu_freelist_populate+0xc0/0x120
[   12.524417]                    htab_map_alloc+0x405/0x500
[   12.524835]                    __do_sys_bpf+0x1a3/0x1a90
[   12.525253]                    do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180
[   12.525659]                    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[   12.526167]  }
[   12.526311]  ... key      at: [] __key.13130+0x0/0x8
[   12.526812]  ... acquired at:
[   12.527047]    __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350
[   12.527371]    lock_acquire+0x98/0x190
[   12.527680]    _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
[   12.527994]    pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40
[   12.528325]    bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0
[   12.528645]    ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0
[   12.528970]
[   12.529092]
[   12.529092] stack backtrace:
[   12.529444] CPU: 0 PID: 276 Comm: dd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422 #475
[   12.530043] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
[   12.530750] Call Trace:
[   12.530948]  dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b
[   12.531248]  check_usage_backwards+0x10c/0x120
[   12.531598]  ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0
[   12.531935]  ? mark_lock+0x382/0x560
[   12.532229]  mark_lock+0x382/0x560
[   12.532496]  ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x180/0x180
[   12.532928]  __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350
[   12.533271]  ? find_get_entry+0x17f/0x2e0
[   12.533586]  ? find_get_entry+0x19c/0x2e0
[   12.533902]  ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190
[   12.534196]  lock_acquire+0x98/0x190
[   12.534482]  ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40
[   12.534810]  _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
[   12.535099]  ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40
[   12.535432]  pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40
[   12.535750]  bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0
[   12.536062]  ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0

It has been explained that is a false positive here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/25/756
Recap:
- stackmap uses pcpu_freelist
- The lock in pcpu_freelist is a percpu lock
- stackmap is only used by tracing bpf_prog
- A tracing bpf_prog cannot be run if another bpf_prog
  has already been running (ensured by the percpu bpf_prog_active counter).

Eric pointed out that this lockdep splats stops other
legit lockdep splats in selftests/bpf/test_progs.c.

Fix this by calling local_irq_save/restore for stackmap.

Another false positive had also been worked around by calling
local_irq_save in commit 89ad2fa3f043 ("bpf: fix lockdep splat").
That commit added unnecessary irq_save/restore to fast path of
bpf hash map. irqs are already disabled at that point, since htab
is holding per bucket spin_lock with irqsave.

Let's reduce overhead for htab by introducing __pcpu_freelist_push/pop
function w/o irqsave and convert pcpu_freelist_push/pop to irqsave
to be used elsewhere (right now only in stackmap).
It stops lockdep false positive in stackmap with a bit of acceptable overhead.

Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation")
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju 
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet 
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: run bpf programs with preemption disabled

2019-01-31T22:14:55+00:00

Disabled preemption is necessary for proper access to per-cpu maps
from BPF programs.

But the sender side of socket filters didn't have preemption disabled:
unix_dgram_sendmsg->sk_filter->sk_filter_trim_cap->bpf_prog_run_save_cb->BPF_PROG_RUN

and a combination of af_packet with tun device didn't disable either:
tpacket_snd->packet_direct_xmit->packet_pick_tx_queue->ndo_select_queue->
  tun_select_queue->tun_ebpf_select_queue->bpf_prog_run_clear_cb->BPF_PROG_RUN

Disable preemption before executing BPF programs (both classic and extended).

Reported-by: Jann Horn 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Acked-by: Song Liu 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: btf: allow typedef func_proto

2019-01-30T03:15:32+00:00

Current implementation does not allow typedef func_proto.
But it is actually allowed.
  -bash-4.4$ cat t.c
  typedef int (f) (int);
  f *g;
  -bash-4.4$ clang -O2 -g -c -target bpf t.c -Xclang -target-feature -Xclang +dwarfris
  -bash-4.4$ pahole -JV t.o
  File t.o:
  [1] PTR (anon) type_id=2
  [2] TYPEDEF f type_id=3
  [3] FUNC_PROTO (anon) return=4 args=(4 (anon))
  [4] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
  -bash-4.4$

This patch related btf verifier to allow such (typedef func_proto)
patterns.

Fixes: 2667a2626f4d ("bpf: btf: Add BTF_KIND_FUNC and BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix inner map masking to prevent oob under speculation

2019-01-18T23:19:56+00:00

During review I noticed that inner meta map setup for map in
map is buggy in that it does not propagate all needed data
from the reference map which the verifier is later accessing.

In particular one such case is index masking to prevent out of
bounds access under speculative execution due to missing the
map's unpriv_array/index_mask field propagation. Fix this such
that the verifier is generating the correct code for inlined
lookups in case of unpriviledged use.

Before patch (test_verifier's 'map in map access' dump):

  # bpftool prog dump xla id 3
     0: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
     1: (bf) r2 = r10
     2: (07) r2 += -4
     3: (18) r1 = map[id:4]
     5: (07) r1 += 272                |
     6: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     |
     7: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+6   | Inlined map in map lookup
     8: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0      | with index masking for
     9: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | map->unpriv_array.
    10: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)     |
    12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1   |
    13: (05) goto pc+1                |
    14: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    15: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+11
    16: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
    17: (bf) r2 = r10
    18: (07) r2 += -4
    19: (bf) r1 = r0
    20: (07) r1 += 272                |
    21: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     | Index masking missing (!)
    22: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+3   | for inner map despite
    23: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | map->unpriv_array set.
    24: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    25: (05) goto pc+1                |
    26: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    27: (b7) r0 = 0
    28: (95) exit

After patch:

  # bpftool prog dump xla id 1
     0: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
     1: (bf) r2 = r10
     2: (07) r2 += -4
     3: (18) r1 = map[id:2]
     5: (07) r1 += 272                |
     6: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     |
     7: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+6   | Same inlined map in map lookup
     8: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0      | with index masking due to
     9: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | map->unpriv_array.
    10: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)     |
    12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1   |
    13: (05) goto pc+1                |
    14: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    15: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+12
    16: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
    17: (bf) r2 = r10
    18: (07) r2 += -4
    19: (bf) r1 = r0
    20: (07) r1 += 272                |
    21: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     |
    22: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+4   | Now fixed inlined inner map
    23: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0      | lookup with proper index masking
    24: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | for map->unpriv_array.
    25: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    26: (05) goto pc+1                |
    27: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    28: (b7) r0 = 0
    29: (95) exit

Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Annotate implicit fall through in cgroup_dev_func_proto

2019-01-17T15:52:23+00:00

There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough
and this place in the code produced a warnings (W=1).

This commit removes the following warning:

  kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:719:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Make function btf_name_offset_valid static

2019-01-17T15:47:05+00:00

Initially in commit 69b693f0aefa ("bpf: btf: Introduce BPF Type Format
(BTF)") the function 'btf_name_offset_valid' was introduced as static
function it was later on changed to a non-static one, and then finally
in commit 23127b33ec80 ("bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for
non type name use case") the function prototype was removed.

Revert back to original implementation and make the function static.
Remove warning triggered with W=1:

  kernel/bpf/btf.c:470:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'btf_name_offset_valid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Fixes: 23127b33ec80 ("bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for non type name use case")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre 
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann