Pull bpf fixes from Daniel Borkmann: - Fix BPF verifier to not affect subreg_def marks in its range propagation (Eduard Zingerman) - Fix a truncation bug in the BPF verifier's handling of coerce_reg_to_size_sx (Dimitar Kanaliev) - Fix the BPF verifier's delta propagation between linked registers under 32-bit addition (Daniel Borkmann) - Fix a NULL pointer dereference in BPF devmap due to missing rxq information (Florian Kauer) - Fix a memory leak in bpf_core_apply (Jiri Olsa) - Fix an UBSAN-reported array-index-out-of-bounds in BTF parsing for arrays of nested structs (Hou Tao) - Fix build ID fetching where memory areas backing the file were created with memfd_secret (Andrii Nakryiko) - Fix BPF task iterator tid filtering which was incorrectly using pid instead of tid (Jordan Rome) - Several fixes for BPF sockmap and BPF sockhash redirection in combination with vsocks (Michal Luczaj) - Fix riscv BPF JIT and make BPF_CMPXCHG fully ordered (Andrea Parri) - Fix riscv BPF JIT under CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to prevent the possibility of an infinite BPF tailcall (Pu Lehui) - Fix a build warning from resolve_btfids that bpf_lsm_key_free cannot be resolved (Thomas Weißschuh) - Fix a bug in kfunc BTF caching for modules where the wrong BTF object was returned (Toke Høiland-Jørgensen) - Fix a BPF selftest compilation error in cgroup-related tests with musl libc (Tony Ambardar) - Several fixes to BPF link info dumps to fill missing fields (Tyrone Wu) - Add BPF selftests for kfuncs from multiple modules, checking that the correct kfuncs are called (Simon Sundberg) - Ensure that internal and user-facing bpf_redirect flags don't overlap (Toke Høiland-Jørgensen) - Switch to use kvzmalloc to allocate BPF verifier environment (Rik van Riel) - Use raw_spinlock_t in BPF ringbuf to fix a sleep in atomic splat under RT (Wander Lairson Costa) * tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf: (38 commits) lib/buildid: Handle memfd_secret() files in build_id_parse() selftests/bpf: Add test case for delta propagation bpf: Fix print_reg_state's constant scalar dump bpf: Fix incorrect delta propagation between linked registers bpf: Properly test iter/task tid filtering bpf: Fix iter/task tid filtering riscv, bpf: Make BPF_CMPXCHG fully ordered bpf, vsock: Drop static vsock_bpf_prot initialization vsock: Update msg_count on read_skb() vsock: Update rx_bytes on read_skb() bpf, sockmap: SK_DROP on attempted redirects of unsupported af_vsock selftests/bpf: Add asserts for netfilter link info bpf: Fix link info netfilter flags to populate defrag flag selftests/bpf: Add test for sign extension in coerce_subreg_to_size_sx() selftests/bpf: Add test for truncation after sign extension in coerce_reg_to_size_sx() bpf: Fix truncation bug in coerce_reg_to_size_sx() selftests/bpf: Assert link info uprobe_multi count & path_size if unset bpf: Fix unpopulated path_size when uprobe_multi fields unset selftests/bpf: Fix cross-compiling urandom_read selftests/bpf: Add test for kfunc module order ...
print_reg_state() should not consider adding reg->off to reg->var_off.value
when dumping scalars. Scalars can be produced with reg->off != 0 through
BPF_ADD_CONST, and thus as-is this can skew the register log dump.
Fixes: 98d7ca374ba4 ("bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers.")
Reported-by: Nathaniel Theis <nathaniel.theis@nccgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241016134913.32249-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
Nathaniel reported a bug in the linked scalar delta tracking, which can lead
to accepting a program with OOB access. The specific code is related to the
sync_linked_regs() function and the BPF_ADD_CONST flag, which signifies a
constant offset between two scalar registers tracked by the same register id.
The verifier attempts to track "similar" scalars in order to propagate bounds
information learned about one scalar to others. For instance, if r1 and r2
are known to contain the same value, then upon encountering 'if (r1 != 0x1234)
goto xyz', not only does it know that r1 is equal to 0x1234 on the path where
that conditional jump is not taken, it also knows that r2 is.
Additionally, with env->bpf_capable set, the verifier will track scalars
which should be a constant delta apart (if r1 is known to be one greater than
r2, then if r1 is known to be equal to 0x1234, r2 must be equal to 0x1233.)
The code path for the latter in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() is reached when
processing both 32 and 64-bit addition operations. While adjust_reg_min_max_vals()
knows whether dst_reg was produced by a 32 or a 64-bit addition (based on the
alu32 bool), the only information saved in dst_reg is the id of the source
register (reg->id, or'ed by BPF_ADD_CONST) and the value of the constant
offset (reg->off).
Later, the function sync_linked_regs() will attempt to use this information
to propagate bounds information from one register (known_reg) to others,
meaning, for all R in linked_regs, it copies known_reg range (and possibly
adjusting delta) into R for the case of R->id == known_reg->id.
For the delta adjustment, meaning, matching reg->id with BPF_ADD_CONST, the
verifier adjusts the register as reg = known_reg; reg += delta where delta
is computed as (s32)reg->off - (s32)known_reg->off and placed as a scalar
into a fake_reg to then simulate the addition of reg += fake_reg. This is
only correct, however, if the value in reg was created by a 64-bit addition.
When reg contains the result of a 32-bit addition operation, its upper 32
bits will always be zero. sync_linked_regs() on the other hand, may cause
the verifier to believe that the addition between fake_reg and reg overflows
into those upper bits. For example, if reg was generated by adding the
constant 1 to known_reg using a 32-bit alu operation, then reg->off is 1
and known_reg->off is 0. If known_reg is known to be the constant 0xFFFFFFFF,
sync_linked_regs() will tell the verifier that reg is equal to the constant
0x100000000. This is incorrect as the actual value of reg will be 0, as the
32-bit addition will wrap around.
Example:
0: (b7) r0 = 0; R0_w=0
1: (18) r1 = 0x80000001; R1_w=0x80000001
3: (37) r1 /= 1; R1_w=scalar()
4: (bf) r2 = r1; R1_w=scalar(id=1) R2_w=scalar(id=1)
5: (bf) r4 = r1; R1_w=scalar(id=1) R4_w=scalar(id=1)
6: (04) w2 += 2147483647; R2_w=scalar(id=1+2147483647,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
7: (04) w4 += 0 ; R4_w=scalar(id=1+0,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
8: (15) if r2 == 0x0 goto pc+1
10: R0=0 R1=0xffffffff80000001 R2=0x7fffffff R4=0xffffffff80000001 R10=fp0
What can be seen here is that r1 is copied to r2 and r4, such that {r1,r2,r4}.id
are all the same which later lets sync_linked_regs() to be invoked. Then, in
a next step constants are added with alu32 to r2 and r4, setting their ->off,
as well as id |= BPF_ADD_CONST. Next, the conditional will bind r2 and
propagate ranges to its linked registers. The verifier now believes the upper
32 bits of r4 are r4=0xffffffff80000001, while actually r4=r1=0x80000001.
One approach for a simple fix suitable also for stable is to limit the constant
delta tracking to only 64-bit alu addition. If necessary at some later point,
BPF_ADD_CONST could be split into BPF_ADD_CONST64 and BPF_ADD_CONST32 to avoid
mixing the two under the tradeoff to further complicate sync_linked_regs().
However, none of the added tests from dedf56d775c0 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests
for add_const") make this necessary at this point, meaning, BPF CI also passes
with just limiting tracking to 64-bit alu addition.
Fixes: 98d7ca374ba4 ("bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers.")
Reported-by: Nathaniel Theis <nathaniel.theis@nccgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241016134913.32249-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
In userspace, you can add a tid filter by setting
the "task.tid" field for "bpf_iter_link_info".
However, `get_pid_task` when called for the
`BPF_TASK_ITER_TID` type should have been using
`PIDTYPE_PID` (tid) instead of `PIDTYPE_TGID` (pid).
Fixes: f0d74c4da1f0 ("bpf: Parameterize task iterators.")
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome <linux@jordanrome.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241016210048.1213935-1-linux@jordanrome.com
coerce_reg_to_size_sx() updates the register state after a sign-extension
operation. However, there's a bug in the assignment order of the unsigned
min/max values, leading to incorrect truncation:
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar()
1: (57) r0 &= 1 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))
2: (07) r0 += 254 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=254,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0xfe; 0x1))
3: (bf) r0 = (s8)r0 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-2,smax=smax32=-1,umin=umin32=0xfffffffe,umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0xfffffffffffffffe; 0x1))
In the current implementation, the unsigned 32-bit min/max values
(u32_min_value and u32_max_value) are assigned directly from the 64-bit
signed min/max values (s64_min and s64_max):
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = s64_min;
reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value = s64_max;
Due to the chain assigmnent, this is equivalent to:
reg->u32_min_value = s64_min; // Unintended truncation
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value;
reg->u32_max_value = s64_max; // Unintended truncation
reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value;
Fixes: 1f9a1ea821ff ("bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns")
Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Kanaliev <dimitar.kanaliev@siteground.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014121155.92887-2-dimitar.kanaliev@siteground.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The verifier contains a cache for looking up module BTF objects when
calling kfuncs defined in modules. This cache uses a 'struct
bpf_kfunc_btf_tab', which contains a sorted list of BTF objects that
were already seen in the current verifier run, and the BTF objects are
looked up by the offset stored in the relocated call instruction using
bsearch().
The first time a given offset is seen, the module BTF is loaded from the
file descriptor passed in by libbpf, and stored into the cache. However,
there's a bug in the code storing the new entry: it stores a pointer to
the new cache entry, then calls sort() to keep the cache sorted for the
next lookup using bsearch(), and then returns the entry that was just
stored through the stored pointer. However, because sort() modifies the
list of entries in place *by value*, the stored pointer may no longer
point to the right entry, in which case the wrong BTF object will be
returned.
The end result of this is an intermittent bug where, if a BPF program
calls two functions with the same signature in two different modules,
the function from the wrong module may sometimes end up being called.
Whether this happens depends on the order of the calls in the BPF
program (as that affects whether sort() reorders the array of BTF
objects), making it especially hard to track down. Simon, credited as
reporter below, spent significant effort analysing and creating a
reproducer for this issue. The reproducer is added as a selftest in a
subsequent patch.
The fix is straight forward: simply don't use the stored pointer after
calling sort(). Since we already have an on-stack pointer to the BTF
object itself at the point where the function return, just use that, and
populate it from the cache entry in the branch where the lookup
succeeds.
Fixes: 2357672c54c3 ("bpf: Introduce BPF support for kernel module function calls")
Reported-by: Simon Sundberg <simon.sundberg@kau.se>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010-fix-kfunc-btf-caching-for-modules-v2-1-745af6c1af98@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the
kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This
behavior was inconsistent with how other input/output string buffer
fields function (e.g. `raw_tracepoint.tp_name_len`).
This patch fills `name_len` with the actual size of the string name.
Fixes: 1b715e1b0ec5 ("bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event")
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008164312.46269-1-wudevelops@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The kzmalloc call in bpf_check can fail when memory is very fragmented, which in turn can lead to an OOM kill. Use kvzmalloc to fall back to vmalloc when memory is too fragmented to allocate an order 3 sized bpf verifier environment. Admittedly this is not a very common case, and only happens on systems where memory has already been squeezed close to the limit, but this does not seem like much of a hot path, and it's a simple enough fix. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008170735.16766766@imladris.surriel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When trying to repeat the btf fields for array of nested struct, it
doesn't check the remaining info_cnt. The following splat will be
reported when the value of ret * nelems is greater than BTF_FIELDS_MAX:
------------[ cut here ]------------
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/bpf/btf.c:3951:49
index 11 is out of range for type 'btf_field_info [11]'
CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: test_progs ...... 6.11.0-rc4+ #1
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70
dump_stack+0x10/0x20
ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x6f/0x80
? kallsyms_lookup_name+0x48/0xb0
btf_parse_fields+0x992/0xce0
map_create+0x591/0x770
__sys_bpf+0x229/0x2410
__x64_sys_bpf+0x1f/0x30
x64_sys_call+0x199/0x9f0
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
RIP: 0033:0x7fea56f2cc5d
......
</TASK>
---[ end trace ]---
Fix it by checking the remaining info_cnt in btf_repeat_fields() before
repeating the btf fields.
Fixes: 64e8ee814819 ("bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008071114.3718177-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The key_free LSM hook has been removed.
Remove the corresponding BPF hook.
Avoid warnings during the build:
BTFIDS vmlinux
WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_lsm_key_free
Fixes: 5f8d28f6d7d5 ("lsm: infrastructure management of the key security blob")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241005-lsm-key_free-v1-1-42ea801dbd63@weissschuh.net