linux-toradex.git/kernel/bpf, branch v6.13-rc7 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules bpf: Fix bpf_get_smp_processor_id() on !CONFIG_SMP 2024-12-18T00:09:24+00:00 Andrea Righi arighi@nvidia.com 2024-12-17T19:58:13+00:00 23579010cf0a12476e96a5f1acdf78a9c5843657 On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable: [ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c [ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case. Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper") Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241217195813.622568-1-arighi@nvidia.com 
On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:

 [    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
 [    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
 [    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page

Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case.

Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241217195813.622568-1-arighi@nvidia.com
bpf: Avoid deadlock caused by nested kprobe and fentry bpf programs 2024-12-14T17:49:27+00:00 Priya Bala Govindasamy pgovind2@uci.edu 2024-12-14T01:58:58+00:00 c83508da5620ef89232cb614fb9e02dfdfef2b8f BPF program types like kprobe and fentry can cause deadlocks in certain situations. If a function takes a lock and one of these bpf programs is hooked to some point in the function's critical section, and if the bpf program tries to call the same function and take the same lock it will lead to deadlock. These situations have been reported in the following bug reports. In percpu_freelist - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLAHwsa+2C6j9+UC6ScrDaN9Fjqv1WjB1pP9AzJLhKuLQ@mail.gmail.com/T/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEYm+9zduStsZaDnq93q1jPLqO-PiKX9jy0MuL8LCXmCrQ@mail.gmail.com/T/ In bpf_lru_list - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEajj+DMfiR_WRWU5=6A7KKULdB5Rob_NJopFLWF+i9gCA@mail.gmail.com/T/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEZQDVN6VqnQXvVqGoB+ukOtHGZ9b9U0OLJJYvRoSsMY_g@mail.gmail.com/T/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEaCB1rFAYU7Wf8UxqcqOWKmRPU1Nuzk3_oLk6qXR7LBOA@mail.gmail.com/T/ Similar bugs have been reported by syzbot. In queue_stack_maps - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000004c3fc90615f37756@google.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240418230932.2689-1-hdanton@sina.com/T/ In lpm_trie - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/00000000000035168a061a47fa38@google.com/T/ In ringbuf - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240313121345.2292-1-hdanton@sina.com/T/ Prevent kprobe and fentry bpf programs from attaching to these critical sections by removing CC_FLAGS_FTRACE for percpu_freelist.o, bpf_lru_list.o, queue_stack_maps.o, lpm_trie.o, ringbuf.o files. The bugs reported by syzbot are due to tracepoint bpf programs being called in the critical sections. This patch does not aim to fix deadlocks caused by tracepoint programs. However, it does prevent deadlocks from occurring in similar situations due to kprobe and fentry programs. Signed-off-by: Priya Bala Govindasamy <pgovind2@uci.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAPPBnEZpjGnsuA26Mf9kYibSaGLm=oF6=12L21X1GEQdqjLnzQ@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
BPF program types like kprobe and fentry can cause deadlocks in certain
situations. If a function takes a lock and one of these bpf programs is
hooked to some point in the function's critical section, and if the
bpf program tries to call the same function and take the same lock it will
lead to deadlock. These situations have been reported in the following
bug reports.

In percpu_freelist -
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLAHwsa+2C6j9+UC6ScrDaN9Fjqv1WjB1pP9AzJLhKuLQ@mail.gmail.com/T/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEYm+9zduStsZaDnq93q1jPLqO-PiKX9jy0MuL8LCXmCrQ@mail.gmail.com/T/
In bpf_lru_list -
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEajj+DMfiR_WRWU5=6A7KKULdB5Rob_NJopFLWF+i9gCA@mail.gmail.com/T/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEZQDVN6VqnQXvVqGoB+ukOtHGZ9b9U0OLJJYvRoSsMY_g@mail.gmail.com/T/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEaCB1rFAYU7Wf8UxqcqOWKmRPU1Nuzk3_oLk6qXR7LBOA@mail.gmail.com/T/

Similar bugs have been reported by syzbot.
In queue_stack_maps -
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000004c3fc90615f37756@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240418230932.2689-1-hdanton@sina.com/T/
In lpm_trie -
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/00000000000035168a061a47fa38@google.com/T/
In ringbuf -
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240313121345.2292-1-hdanton@sina.com/T/

Prevent kprobe and fentry bpf programs from attaching to these critical
sections by removing CC_FLAGS_FTRACE for percpu_freelist.o,
bpf_lru_list.o, queue_stack_maps.o, lpm_trie.o, ringbuf.o files.

The bugs reported by syzbot are due to tracepoint bpf programs being
called in the critical sections. This patch does not aim to fix deadlocks
caused by tracepoint programs. However, it does prevent deadlocks from
occurring in similar situations due to kprobe and fentry programs.

Signed-off-by: Priya Bala Govindasamy <pgovind2@uci.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAPPBnEZpjGnsuA26Mf9kYibSaGLm=oF6=12L21X1GEQdqjLnzQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Augment raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL 2024-12-14T00:24:53+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2024-12-13T22:19:28+00:00 838a10bd2ebfe11a60dd67687533a7cfc220cc86 Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0]. Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL check branch to be dead code eliminated. A previous attempt [1], i.e. the second fixed commit, was made to simulate symbolic execution as if in most accesses, the argument is a non-NULL raw_tp, except for conditional jumps. This tried to suppress branch prediction while preserving compatibility, but surfaced issues with production programs that were difficult to solve without increasing verifier complexity. A more complete discussion of issues and fixes is available at [2]. Fix this by maintaining an explicit list of tracepoints where the arguments are known to be NULL, and mark the positional arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Additionally, capture the tracepoints where arguments are known to be ERR_PTR, and mark these arguments as scalar values to prevent potential dereference. Each hex digit is used to encode NULL-ness (0x1) or ERR_PTR-ness (0x2), shifted by the zero-indexed argument number x 4. This can be represented as follows: 1st arg: 0x1 2nd arg: 0x10 3rd arg: 0x100 ... and so on (likewise for ERR_PTR case). In the future, an automated pass will be used to produce such a list, or insert __nullable annotations automatically for tracepoints. Each compilation unit will be analyzed and results will be collated to find whether a tracepoint pointer is definitely not null, maybe null, or an unknown state where verifier conservatively marks it PTR_MAYBE_NULL. A proof of concept of this tool from Eduard is available at [3]. Note that in case we don't find a specification in the raw_tp_null_args array and the tracepoint belongs to a kernel module, we will conservatively mark the arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This is because unlike for in-tree modules, out-of-tree module tracepoints may pass NULL freely to the tracepoint. We don't protect against such tracepoints passing ERR_PTR (which is uncommon anyway), lest we mark all such arguments as SCALAR_VALUE. While we are it, let's adjust the test raw_tp_null to not perform dereference of the skb->mark, as that won't be allowed anymore, and make it more robust by using inline assembly to test the dead code elimination behavior, which should still stay the same. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104171959.2938862-1-memxor@gmail.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com [3]: https://github.com/eddyz87/llvm-project/tree/nullness-for-tracepoint-params Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> # original bug Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com> # bugs in masking fix Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the
semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL.  However, in certain cases,
a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this
issue is available in [0].

Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can
actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL,
causing explicit NULL check branch to be dead code eliminated.

A previous attempt [1], i.e. the second fixed commit, was made to
simulate symbolic execution as if in most accesses, the argument is a
non-NULL raw_tp, except for conditional jumps.  This tried to suppress
branch prediction while preserving compatibility, but surfaced issues
with production programs that were difficult to solve without increasing
verifier complexity. A more complete discussion of issues and fixes is
available at [2].

Fix this by maintaining an explicit list of tracepoints where the
arguments are known to be NULL, and mark the positional arguments as
PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Additionally, capture the tracepoints where arguments
are known to be ERR_PTR, and mark these arguments as scalar values to
prevent potential dereference.

Each hex digit is used to encode NULL-ness (0x1) or ERR_PTR-ness (0x2),
shifted by the zero-indexed argument number x 4. This can be represented
as follows:
1st arg: 0x1
2nd arg: 0x10
3rd arg: 0x100
... and so on (likewise for ERR_PTR case).

In the future, an automated pass will be used to produce such a list, or
insert __nullable annotations automatically for tracepoints. Each
compilation unit will be analyzed and results will be collated to find
whether a tracepoint pointer is definitely not null, maybe null, or an
unknown state where verifier conservatively marks it PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
A proof of concept of this tool from Eduard is available at [3].

Note that in case we don't find a specification in the raw_tp_null_args
array and the tracepoint belongs to a kernel module, we will
conservatively mark the arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This is because
unlike for in-tree modules, out-of-tree module tracepoints may pass NULL
freely to the tracepoint. We don't protect against such tracepoints
passing ERR_PTR (which is uncommon anyway), lest we mark all such
arguments as SCALAR_VALUE.

While we are it, let's adjust the test raw_tp_null to not perform
dereference of the skb->mark, as that won't be allowed anymore, and make
it more robust by using inline assembly to test the dead code
elimination behavior, which should still stay the same.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
  [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104171959.2938862-1-memxor@gmail.com
  [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com
  [3]: https://github.com/eddyz87/llvm-project/tree/nullness-for-tracepoint-params

Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> # original bug
Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com> # bugs in masking fix
Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs")
Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL")
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Revert "bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL" 2024-12-14T00:24:53+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2024-12-13T22:19:27+00:00 c00d738e1673ab801e1577e4e3c780ccf88b1a5b This patch reverts commit cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"). The patch was well-intended and meant to be as a stop-gap fixing branch prediction when the pointer may actually be NULL at runtime. Eventually, it was supposed to be replaced by an automated script or compiler pass detecting possibly NULL arguments and marking them accordingly. However, it caused two main issues observed for production programs and failed to preserve backwards compatibility. First, programs relied on the verifier not exploring == NULL branch when pointer is not NULL, thus they started failing with a 'dereference of scalar' error. Next, allowing raw_tp arguments to be modified surfaced the warning in the verifier that warns against reg->off when PTR_MAYBE_NULL is set. More information, context, and discusson on both problems is available in [0]. Overall, this approach had several shortcomings, and the fixes would further complicate the verifier's logic, and the entire masking scheme would have to be removed eventually anyway. Hence, revert the patch in preparation of a better fix avoiding these issues to replace this commit. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com> Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
This patch reverts commit
cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"). The
patch was well-intended and meant to be as a stop-gap fixing branch
prediction when the pointer may actually be NULL at runtime. Eventually,
it was supposed to be replaced by an automated script or compiler pass
detecting possibly NULL arguments and marking them accordingly.

However, it caused two main issues observed for production programs and
failed to preserve backwards compatibility. First, programs relied on
the verifier not exploring == NULL branch when pointer is not NULL, thus
they started failing with a 'dereference of scalar' error.  Next,
allowing raw_tp arguments to be modified surfaced the warning in the
verifier that warns against reg->off when PTR_MAYBE_NULL is set.

More information, context, and discusson on both problems is available
in [0]. Overall, this approach had several shortcomings, and the fixes
would further complicate the verifier's logic, and the entire masking
scheme would have to be removed eventually anyway.

Hence, revert the patch in preparation of a better fix avoiding these
issues to replace this commit.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com

Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantra@meta.com>
Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Check size for BTF-based ctx access of pointer members 2024-12-12T19:40:18+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2024-12-12T09:20:49+00:00 659b9ba7cb2d7adb64618b87ddfaa528a143766e Robert Morris reported the following program type which passes the verifier in [0]: SEC("struct_ops/bpf_cubic_init") void BPF_PROG(bpf_cubic_init, struct sock *sk) { asm volatile("r2 = *(u16*)(r1 + 0)"); // verifier should demand u64 asm volatile("*(u32 *)(r2 +1504) = 0"); // 1280 in some configs } The second line may or may not work, but the first instruction shouldn't pass, as it's a narrow load into the context structure of the struct ops callback. The code falls back to btf_ctx_access to ensure correctness and obtaining the types of pointers. Ensure that the size of the access is correctly checked to be 8 bytes, otherwise the verifier thinks the narrow load obtained a trusted BTF pointer and will permit loads/stores as it sees fit. Perform the check on size after we've verified that the load is for a pointer field, as for scalar values narrow loads are fine. Access to structs passed as arguments to a BPF program are also treated as scalars, therefore no adjustment is needed in their case. Existing verifier selftests are broken by this change, but because they were incorrect. Verifier tests for d_path were performing narrow load into context to obtain path pointer, had this program actually run it would cause a crash. The same holds for verifier_btf_ctx_access tests. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/51338.1732985814@localhost Fixes: 9e15db66136a ("bpf: Implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF") Reported-by: Robert Morris <rtm@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212092050.3204165-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Robert Morris reported the following program type which passes the
verifier in [0]:

SEC("struct_ops/bpf_cubic_init")
void BPF_PROG(bpf_cubic_init, struct sock *sk)
{
	asm volatile("r2 = *(u16*)(r1 + 0)");     // verifier should demand u64
	asm volatile("*(u32 *)(r2 +1504) = 0");   // 1280 in some configs
}

The second line may or may not work, but the first instruction shouldn't
pass, as it's a narrow load into the context structure of the struct ops
callback. The code falls back to btf_ctx_access to ensure correctness
and obtaining the types of pointers. Ensure that the size of the access
is correctly checked to be 8 bytes, otherwise the verifier thinks the
narrow load obtained a trusted BTF pointer and will permit loads/stores
as it sees fit.

Perform the check on size after we've verified that the load is for a
pointer field, as for scalar values narrow loads are fine. Access to
structs passed as arguments to a BPF program are also treated as
scalars, therefore no adjustment is needed in their case.

Existing verifier selftests are broken by this change, but because they
were incorrect. Verifier tests for d_path were performing narrow load
into context to obtain path pointer, had this program actually run it
would cause a crash. The same holds for verifier_btf_ctx_access tests.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/51338.1732985814@localhost

Fixes: 9e15db66136a ("bpf: Implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF")
Reported-by: Robert Morris <rtm@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212092050.3204165-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: fix null dereference when computing changes_pkt_data of prog w/o subprogs 2024-12-12T19:37:19+00:00 Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com 2024-12-12T07:07:10+00:00 ac6542ad92759cda383ad62b4e4cbfc28136abc1 bpf_prog_aux->func field might be NULL if program does not have subprograms except for main sub-program. The fixed commit does bpf_prog_aux->func access unconditionally, which might lead to null pointer dereference. The bug could be triggered by replacing the following BPF program: SEC("tc") int main_changes(struct __sk_buff *sk) { bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0); return 0; } With the following BPF program: SEC("freplace") long changes_pkt_data(struct __sk_buff *sk) { return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0); } bpf_prog_aux instance itself represents the main sub-program, use this property to fix the bug. Fixes: 81f6d0530ba0 ("bpf: check changes_pkt_data property for extension programs") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202412111822.qGw6tOyB-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212070711.427443-1-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
bpf_prog_aux->func field might be NULL if program does not have
subprograms except for main sub-program. The fixed commit does
bpf_prog_aux->func access unconditionally, which might lead to null
pointer dereference.

The bug could be triggered by replacing the following BPF program:

    SEC("tc")
    int main_changes(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
        bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0);
        return 0;
    }

With the following BPF program:

    SEC("freplace")
    long changes_pkt_data(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
        return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0);
    }

bpf_prog_aux instance itself represents the main sub-program,
use this property to fix the bug.

Fixes: 81f6d0530ba0 ("bpf: check changes_pkt_data property for extension programs")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202412111822.qGw6tOyB-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212070711.427443-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: fix potential error return 2024-12-10T19:17:53+00:00 Anton Protopopov aspsk@isovalent.com 2024-12-10T11:42:45+00:00 c4441ca86afe4814039ee1b32c39d833c1a16bbc The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0 However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210114245.836164-1-aspsk@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where
error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0
However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to
boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual
error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check.

Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210114245.836164-1-aspsk@isovalent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: check changes_pkt_data property for extension programs 2024-12-10T18:24:57+00:00 Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com 2024-12-10T04:10:57+00:00 81f6d0530ba031b5f038a091619bf2ff29568852 When processing calls to global sub-programs, verifier decides whether to invalidate all packet pointers in current state depending on the changes_pkt_data property of the global sub-program. Because of this, an extension program replacing a global sub-program must be compatible with changes_pkt_data property of the sub-program being replaced. This commit: - adds changes_pkt_data flag to struct bpf_prog_aux: - this flag is set in check_cfg() for main sub-program; - in jit_subprogs() for other sub-programs; - modifies bpf_check_attach_btf_id() to check changes_pkt_data flag; - moves call to check_attach_btf_id() after the call to check_cfg(), because it needs changes_pkt_data flag to be set: bpf_check: ... ... - check_attach_btf_id resolve_pseudo_ldimm64 resolve_pseudo_ldimm64 --> bpf_prog_is_offloaded bpf_prog_is_offloaded check_cfg check_cfg + check_attach_btf_id ... ... The following fields are set by check_attach_btf_id(): - env->ops - prog->aux->attach_btf_trace - prog->aux->attach_func_name - prog->aux->attach_func_proto - prog->aux->dst_trampoline - prog->aux->mod - prog->aux->saved_dst_attach_type - prog->aux->saved_dst_prog_type - prog->expected_attach_type Neither of these fields are used by resolve_pseudo_ldimm64() or bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep() (for netronome and netdevsim drivers), so the reordering is safe. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-6-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
When processing calls to global sub-programs, verifier decides whether
to invalidate all packet pointers in current state depending on the
changes_pkt_data property of the global sub-program.

Because of this, an extension program replacing a global sub-program
must be compatible with changes_pkt_data property of the sub-program
being replaced.

This commit:
- adds changes_pkt_data flag to struct bpf_prog_aux:
  - this flag is set in check_cfg() for main sub-program;
  - in jit_subprogs() for other sub-programs;
- modifies bpf_check_attach_btf_id() to check changes_pkt_data flag;
- moves call to check_attach_btf_id() after the call to check_cfg(),
  because it needs changes_pkt_data flag to be set:

    bpf_check:
      ...                             ...
    - check_attach_btf_id             resolve_pseudo_ldimm64
      resolve_pseudo_ldimm64   -->    bpf_prog_is_offloaded
      bpf_prog_is_offloaded           check_cfg
      check_cfg                     + check_attach_btf_id
      ...                             ...

The following fields are set by check_attach_btf_id():
- env->ops
- prog->aux->attach_btf_trace
- prog->aux->attach_func_name
- prog->aux->attach_func_proto
- prog->aux->dst_trampoline
- prog->aux->mod
- prog->aux->saved_dst_attach_type
- prog->aux->saved_dst_prog_type
- prog->expected_attach_type

Neither of these fields are used by resolve_pseudo_ldimm64() or
bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep() (for netronome and netdevsim
drivers), so the reordering is safe.

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions 2024-12-10T18:24:57+00:00 Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com 2024-12-10T04:10:55+00:00 51081a3f25c742da5a659d7fc6fd77ebfdd555be When processing calls to certain helpers, verifier invalidates all packet pointers in a current state. For example, consider the following program: __attribute__((__noinline__)) long skb_pull_data(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len) { return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len); } SEC("tc") int test_invalidate_checks(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) return TCX_DROP; skb_pull_data(sk, 0); *p = 42; return TCX_PASS; } After a call to bpf_skb_pull_data() the pointer 'p' can't be used safely. See function filter.c:bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() for a list of such helpers. At the moment verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing helper function calls, and does not traverse global sub-programs when processing calls to global sub-programs. This means that calls to helpers done from global sub-programs do not invalidate pointers in the caller state. E.g. the program above is unsafe, but is not rejected by verifier. This commit fixes the omission by computing field bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data for each sub-program before main verification pass. changes_pkt_data should be set if: - subprogram calls helper for which bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data returns true; - subprogram calls a global function, for which bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data should be set. The verifier.c:check_cfg() pass is modified to compute this information. The commit relies on depth first instruction traversal done by check_cfg() and absence of recursive function calls: - check_cfg() would eventually visit every call to subprogram S in a state when S is fully explored; - when S is fully explored: - every direct helper call within S is explored (and thus changes_pkt_data is set if needed); - every call to subprogram S1 called by S was visited with S1 fully explored (and thus S inherits changes_pkt_data from S1). The downside of such approach is that dead code elimination is not taken into account: if a helper call inside global function is dead because of current configuration, verifier would conservatively assume that the call occurs for the purpose of the changes_pkt_data computation. Reported-by: Nick Zavaritsky <mejedi@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0498CA22-5779-4767-9C0C-A9515CEA711F@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
When processing calls to certain helpers, verifier invalidates all
packet pointers in a current state. For example, consider the
following program:

    __attribute__((__noinline__))
    long skb_pull_data(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len)
    {
        return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len);
    }

    SEC("tc")
    int test_invalidate_checks(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
        int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
        if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) return TCX_DROP;
        skb_pull_data(sk, 0);
        *p = 42;
        return TCX_PASS;
    }

After a call to bpf_skb_pull_data() the pointer 'p' can't be used
safely. See function filter.c:bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() for a list
of such helpers.

At the moment verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing
helper function calls, and does not traverse global sub-programs when
processing calls to global sub-programs. This means that calls to
helpers done from global sub-programs do not invalidate pointers in
the caller state. E.g. the program above is unsafe, but is not
rejected by verifier.

This commit fixes the omission by computing field
bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data for each sub-program before main
verification pass.
changes_pkt_data should be set if:
- subprogram calls helper for which bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data
  returns true;
- subprogram calls a global function,
  for which bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data should be set.

The verifier.c:check_cfg() pass is modified to compute this
information. The commit relies on depth first instruction traversal
done by check_cfg() and absence of recursive function calls:
- check_cfg() would eventually visit every call to subprogram S in a
  state when S is fully explored;
- when S is fully explored:
  - every direct helper call within S is explored
    (and thus changes_pkt_data is set if needed);
  - every call to subprogram S1 called by S was visited with S1 fully
    explored (and thus S inherits changes_pkt_data from S1).

The downside of such approach is that dead code elimination is not
taken into account: if a helper call inside global function is dead
because of current configuration, verifier would conservatively assume
that the call occurs for the purpose of the changes_pkt_data
computation.

Reported-by: Nick Zavaritsky <mejedi@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0498CA22-5779-4767-9C0C-A9515CEA711F@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: refactor bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data to use helper number 2024-12-10T18:24:57+00:00 Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com 2024-12-10T04:10:54+00:00 b238e187b4a2d3b54d80aec05a9cab6466b79dde Use BPF helper number instead of function pointer in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(). This would simplify usage of this function in verifier.c:check_cfg() (in a follow-up patch), where only helper number is easily available and there is no real need to lookup helper proto. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Use BPF helper number instead of function pointer in
bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(). This would simplify usage of this
function in verifier.c:check_cfg() (in a follow-up patch),
where only helper number is easily available and there is no real need
to lookup helper proto.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>