linux-toradex.git/kernel/locking/lockdep.c, branch v4.4.106

locking/lockdep: Add nest_lock integrity test

2017-10-21T15:09:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7fb4a2cea6b18dab56d609530d077f168169ed6b ]

Boqun reported that hlock->references can overflow. Add a debug test
for that to generate a clear error when this happens.

Without this, lockdep is likely to report a mysterious failure on
unlock.

Reported-by: Boqun Feng 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Nicolai Hähnle 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

treewide: Remove old email address

2015-11-23T08:44:58+00:00

There were still a number of references to my old Red Hat email
address in the kernel source. Remove these while keeping the
Red Hat copyright notices intact.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Mike Galbraith 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd

2015-11-07T01:50:42+00:00

__GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".

Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
reserves.

This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
__GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
kswapd for background reclaim.

This patch then converts a number of sites

o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
  pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.

o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
  into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
  are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.

o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
  helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
  checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
  positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
  is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
  flag manipulations.

o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
  and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.

The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.

The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Christoph Lameter 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Vitaly Wool 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

locking/lockdep: Fix hlock->pin_count reset on lock stack rebuilds

2015-09-23T07:48:53+00:00

Various people reported hitting the "unpinning an unpinned lock"
warning. As it turns out there are 2 places where we take a lock out
of the middle of a stack, and in those cases it would fail to preserve
the pin_count when rebuilding the lock stack.

Reported-by: Sasha Levin 
Reported-by: Tim Spriggs 
Tested-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150916141040.GA11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Merge branch 'sched-hrtimers-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2015-06-24T22:09:40+00:00

Pull scheduler updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "This series of scheduler updates depends on sched/core and timers/core
  branches, which are already in your tree:

   - Scheduler balancing overhaul to plug a hard to trigger race which
     causes an oops in the balancer (Peter Zijlstra)

   - Lockdep updates which are related to the balancing updates (Peter
     Zijlstra)"

* 'sched-hrtimers-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  sched,lockdep: Employ lock pinning
  lockdep: Implement lock pinning
  lockdep: Simplify lock_release()
  sched: Streamline the task migration locking a little
  sched: Move code around
  sched,dl: Fix sched class hopping CBS hole
  sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks
  sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task()
  sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks
  sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task()
  sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed()
  sched: Use replace normalize_task() with __sched_setscheduler()
  sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list

Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2015-06-22T21:54:22+00:00

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "The main changes are:

   - 'qspinlock' support, enabled on x86: queued spinlocks - these are
     now the spinlock variant used by x86 as they outperform ticket
     spinlocks in every category.  (Waiman Long)

   - 'pvqspinlock' support on x86: paravirtualized variant of queued
     spinlocks.  (Waiman Long, Peter Zijlstra)

   - 'qrwlock' support, enabled on x86: queued rwlocks.  Similar to
     queued spinlocks, they are now the variant used by x86:

       CONFIG_ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS=y
       CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS=y
       CONFIG_ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS=y
       CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS=y

   - various lockdep fixlets

   - various locking primitives cleanups, further WRITE_ONCE()
     propagation"

* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (24 commits)
  locking/lockdep: Remove hard coded array size dependency
  locking/qrwlock: Don't contend with readers when setting _QW_WAITING
  lockdep: Do not break user-visible string
  locking/arch: Rename set_mb() to smp_store_mb()
  locking/arch: Add WRITE_ONCE() to set_mb()
  rtmutex: Warn if trylock is called from hard/softirq context
  arch: Remove __ARCH_HAVE_CMPXCHG
  locking/rtmutex: Drop usage of __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG
  locking/qrwlock: Rename QUEUE_RWLOCK to QUEUED_RWLOCKS
  locking/pvqspinlock: Rename QUEUED_SPINLOCK to QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
  locking/pvqspinlock: Replace xchg() by the more descriptive set_mb()
  locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for Xen
  locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for KVM
  locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Implement the paravirt qspinlock call patching
  locking/pvqspinlock: Implement simple paravirt support for the qspinlock
  locking/qspinlock: Revert to test-and-set on hypervisors
  locking/qspinlock: Use a simple write to grab the lock
  locking/qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
  locking/qspinlock: Extract out code snippets for the next patch
  locking/qspinlock: Add pending bit
  ...

lockdep: Implement lock pinning

2015-06-18T22:25:27+00:00

Add a lockdep annotation that WARNs if you 'accidentially' unlock a
lock.

This is especially helpful for code with callbacks, where the upper
layer assumes a lock remains taken but a lower layer thinks it maybe
can drop and reacquire the lock.

By unwittingly breaking up the lock, races can be introduced.

Lock pinning is a lockdep annotation that helps with this, when you
lockdep_pin_lock() a held lock, any unlock without a
lockdep_unpin_lock() will produce a WARN. Think of this as a relative
of lockdep_assert_held(), except you don't only assert its held now,
but ensure it stays held until you release your assertion.

RFC: a possible alternative API would be something like:

  int cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&foo);
  ...
  lockdep_unpin_lock(&foo, cookie);

Where we pick a random number for the pin_count; this makes it
impossible to sneak a lock break in without also passing the right
cookie along.

I've not done this because it ends up generating code for !LOCKDEP,
esp. if you need to pass the cookie around for some reason.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124743.906731065@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

lockdep: Simplify lock_release()

2015-06-18T22:25:27+00:00

lock_release() takes this nested argument that's mostly pointless
these days, remove the implementation but leave the argument a
rudiment for now.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124743.840411606@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

lockdep: Fix a race between /proc/lock_stat and module unload

2015-06-07T13:46:30+00:00

The lock_class iteration of /proc/lock_stat is not serialized against
the lockdep_free_key_range() call from module unload.

Therefore it can happen that we find a class of which ->name/->key are
no longer valid.

There is a further bug in zap_class() that left ->name dangling. Cure
this. Use RCU_INIT_POINTER() because NULL.

Since lockdep_free_key_range() is rcu_sched serialized, we can read
both ->name and ->key under rcu_read_lock_sched() (preempt-disable)
and be assured that if we observe a !NULL value it stays safe to use
for as long as we hold that lock.

If we observe both NULL, skip the entry.

Reported-by: Jerome Marchand 
Tested-by: Jerome Marchand 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: H. Peter Anvin 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150602105013.GS3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

lockdep: Do not break user-visible string

2015-06-03T08:07:09+00:00

Remove the line-break in the user-visible string and add the
missing space in this error message:

  WARNING: lockdep init error! lock-(console_sem).lock was acquiredbefore lockdep_init

Also:

  - don't yell, it's just a debug warning

  - denote references to function calls with '()'

  - standardize the lock name quoting

  - and finish the sentence.

The result:

  WARNING: lockdep init error: lock '(console_sem).lock' was acquired before lockdep_init().

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150602133827.GD19887@pd.tnic
[ Added a few more stylistic tweaks to the error message. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar