linux-toradex.git/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c, branch v4.10-rc5

locking/rtmutex: Explain locking rules for rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()/init_proxy_locked()

2016-12-02T10:13:57+00:00

While debugging the unlock vs. dequeue race which resulted in state
corruption of futexes the lockless nature of rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()
caused some confusion.

Add commentry to explain why it is safe to do this lockless. Add matching
comments to rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked() for completeness sake.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: David Daney 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Mark Rutland 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Sebastian Siewior 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130210030.591941927@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core, to pick up dependent fixes

2016-12-02T10:13:44+00:00

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/rtmutex: Prevent dequeue vs. unlock race

2016-12-02T10:13:26+00:00

David reported a futex/rtmutex state corruption. It's caused by the
following problem:

CPU0		CPU1		CPU2

l->owner=T1
		rt_mutex_lock(l)
		lock(l->wait_lock)
		l->owner = T1 | HAS_WAITERS;
		enqueue(T2)
		boost()
		  unlock(l->wait_lock)
		schedule()

				rt_mutex_lock(l)
				lock(l->wait_lock)
				l->owner = T1 | HAS_WAITERS;
				enqueue(T3)
				boost()
				  unlock(l->wait_lock)
				schedule()
		signal(->T2)	signal(->T3)
		lock(l->wait_lock)
		dequeue(T2)
		deboost()
		  unlock(l->wait_lock)
				lock(l->wait_lock)
				dequeue(T3)
				  ===> wait list is now empty
				deboost()
				 unlock(l->wait_lock)
		lock(l->wait_lock)
		fixup_rt_mutex_waiters()
		  if (wait_list_empty(l)) {
		    owner = l->owner & ~HAS_WAITERS;
		    l->owner = owner
		     ==> l->owner = T1
		  }

				lock(l->wait_lock)
rt_mutex_unlock(l)		fixup_rt_mutex_waiters()
				  if (wait_list_empty(l)) {
				    owner = l->owner & ~HAS_WAITERS;
cmpxchg(l->owner, T1, NULL)
 ===> Success (l->owner = NULL)
				    l->owner = owner
				     ==> l->owner = T1
				  }

That means the problem is caused by fixup_rt_mutex_waiters() which does the
RMW to clear the waiters bit unconditionally when there are no waiters in
the rtmutexes rbtree.

This can be fatal: A concurrent unlock can release the rtmutex in the
fastpath because the waiters bit is not set. If the cmpxchg() gets in the
middle of the RMW operation then the previous owner, which just unlocked
the rtmutex is set as the owner again when the write takes place after the
successfull cmpxchg().

The solution is rather trivial: verify that the owner member of the rtmutex
has the waiters bit set before clearing it. This does not require a
cmpxchg() or other atomic operations because the waiters bit can only be
set and cleared with the rtmutex wait_lock held. It's also safe against the
fast path unlock attempt. The unlock attempt via cmpxchg() will either see
the bit set and take the slowpath or see the bit cleared and release it
atomically in the fastpath.

It's remarkable that the test program provided by David triggers on ARM64
and MIPS64 really quick, but it refuses to reproduce on x86-64, while the
problem exists there as well. That refusal might explain that this got not
discovered earlier despite the bug existing from day one of the rtmutex
implementation more than 10 years ago.

Thanks to David for meticulously instrumenting the code and providing the
information which allowed to decode this subtle problem.

Reported-by: David Daney 
Tested-by: David Daney 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Mark Rutland 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Sebastian Siewior 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 23f78d4a03c5 ("[PATCH] pi-futex: rt mutex core")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130210030.351136722@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/wake_q: Rename WAKE_Q to DEFINE_WAKE_Q

2016-11-21T09:29:01+00:00

Currently the wake_q data structure is defined by the WAKE_Q() macro.
This macro, however, looks like a function doing something as "wake" is
a verb. Even checkpatch.pl was confused as it reported warnings like

  WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
  #548: FILE: kernel/futex.c:3665:
  +	int ret;
  +	WAKE_Q(wake_q);

This patch renames the WAKE_Q() macro to DEFINE_WAKE_Q() which clarifies
what the macro is doing and eliminates the checkpatch.pl warnings.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long 
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479401198-1765-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com
[ Resolved conflict and added missing rename. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locking/rtmutex: Only warn once on a trylock from bad context

2016-06-08T12:22:00+00:00

One warning should be enough to get one motivated to fix this. It is
possible that this happens more than once and that starts flooding the
output. Later the prints will be suppressed so we only get half of it.
Depending on the console system used it might not be helpful.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464356838-1755-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe

2016-01-26T10:08:35+00:00

Sasha reported a lockdep splat about a potential deadlock between RCU boosting
rtmutex and the posix timer it_lock.

CPU0					CPU1

rtmutex_lock(&rcu->rt_mutex)
  spin_lock(&rcu->rt_mutex.wait_lock)
					local_irq_disable()
					spin_lock(&timer->it_lock)
					spin_lock(&rcu->mutex.wait_lock)
--> Interrupt
    spin_lock(&timer->it_lock)

This is caused by the following code sequence on CPU1

     rcu_read_lock()
     x = lookup();
     if (x)
     	spin_lock_irqsave(&x->it_lock);
     rcu_read_unlock();
     return x;

We could fix that in the posix timer code by keeping rcu read locked across
the spinlocked and irq disabled section, but the above sequence is common and
there is no reason not to support it.

Taking rt_mutex.wait_lock irq safe prevents the deadlock.

Reported-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Paul McKenney

Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2015-11-04T02:03:50+00:00

Pull scheduler changes from Ingo Molnar:
 "The main changes in this cycle were:

   - sched/fair load tracking fixes and cleanups (Byungchul Park)

   - Make load tracking frequency scale invariant (Dietmar Eggemann)

   - sched/deadline updates (Juri Lelli)

   - stop machine fixes, cleanups and enhancements for bugs triggered by
     CPU hotplug stress testing (Oleg Nesterov)

   - scheduler preemption code rework: remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE and related
     cleanups (Peter Zijlstra)

   - Rework the sched_info::run_delay code to fix races (Peter Zijlstra)

   - Optimize per entity utilization tracking (Peter Zijlstra)

   - ... misc other fixes, cleanups and smaller updates"

* 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (57 commits)
  sched: Don't scan all-offline ->cpus_allowed twice if !CONFIG_CPUSETS
  sched: Move cpu_active() tests from stop_two_cpus() into migrate_swap_stop()
  sched: Start stopper early
  stop_machine: Kill cpu_stop_threads->setup() and cpu_stop_unpark()
  stop_machine: Kill smp_hotplug_thread->pre_unpark, introduce stop_machine_unpark()
  stop_machine: Change cpu_stop_queue_two_works() to rely on stopper->enabled
  stop_machine: Introduce __cpu_stop_queue_work() and cpu_stop_queue_two_works()
  stop_machine: Ensure that a queued callback will be called before cpu_stop_park()
  sched/x86: Fix typo in __switch_to() comments
  sched/core: Remove a parameter in the migrate_task_rq() function
  sched/core: Drop unlikely behind BUG_ON()
  sched/core: Fix task and run queue sched_info::run_delay inconsistencies
  sched/numa: Fix task_tick_fair() from disabling numa_balancing
  sched/core: Add preempt_count invariant check
  sched/core: More notrace annotations
  sched/core: Kill PREEMPT_ACTIVE
  sched/core, sched/x86: Kill thread_info::saved_preempt_count
  sched/core: Simplify preempt_count tests
  sched/core: Robustify preemption leak checks
  sched/core: Stop setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE
  ...

locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics

2015-10-06T15:28:22+00:00

As of 654672d4ba1 (locking/atomics: Add _{acquire|release|relaxed}()
variants of some atomic operations) and 6d79ef2d30e (locking, asm-generic:
Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for 'atomic_long_t'), weakly
ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use of barriers when locking
and unlocking, instead of regular full barrier semantics. While currently
only arm64 supports such optimizations, updating corresponding locking
primitives serves for other archs to immediately benefit as well, once the
necessary machinery is implemented of course.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Paul E.McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443643395-17016-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/deadline, locking/rtmutex: Fix open coded check in rt_mutex_waiter_less()

2015-09-23T07:51:25+00:00

rt_mutex_waiter_less() check of task deadlines is open coded. Since this
is subject to wraparound bugs, make it use the correct helper.

Reported-by: Luca Abeni 
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Mike Galbraith 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441188096-23021-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

rtmutex: Delete scriptable tester

2015-07-20T09:45:45+00:00

No one uses this anymore, and this is not the first time the
idea of replacing it with a (now possible) userspace side.
Lock stealing logic was removed long ago in when the lock
was granted to the highest prio.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Mike Galbraith 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435782588-4177-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner