linux-toradex.git/kernel/locking, branch v6.4-rc1 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules Merge tag 'locking-core-2023-05-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2023-05-05T19:56:55+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2023-05-05T19:56:55+00:00 b115d85a9584c98f9a7dec209d835462aa1adc09 Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: - Introduce local{,64}_try_cmpxchg() - a slightly more optimal primitive, which will be used in perf events ring-buffer code - Simplify/modify rwsems on PREEMPT_RT, to address writer starvation - Misc cleanups/fixes * tag 'locking-core-2023-05-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: locking/atomic: Correct (cmp)xchg() instrumentation locking/x86: Define arch_try_cmpxchg_local() locking/arch: Wire up local_try_cmpxchg() locking/generic: Wire up local{,64}_try_cmpxchg() locking/atomic: Add generic try_cmpxchg{,64}_local() support locking/rwbase: Mitigate indefinite writer starvation locking/arch: Rename all internal __xchg() names to __arch_xchg() 
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

 - Introduce local{,64}_try_cmpxchg() - a slightly more optimal
   primitive, which will be used in perf events ring-buffer code

 - Simplify/modify rwsems on PREEMPT_RT, to address writer starvation

 - Misc cleanups/fixes

* tag 'locking-core-2023-05-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  locking/atomic: Correct (cmp)xchg() instrumentation
  locking/x86: Define arch_try_cmpxchg_local()
  locking/arch: Wire up local_try_cmpxchg()
  locking/generic: Wire up local{,64}_try_cmpxchg()
  locking/atomic: Add generic try_cmpxchg{,64}_local() support
  locking/rwbase: Mitigate indefinite writer starvation
  locking/arch: Rename all internal __xchg() names to __arch_xchg()
locking/rwbase: Mitigate indefinite writer starvation 2023-04-29T07:08:52+00:00 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bigeasy@linutronix.de 2023-03-21T16:11:40+00:00 286deb7ec03d941664ac3ffaff58814b454adf65 On PREEMPT_RT, rw_semaphore and rwlock_t locks are unfair to writers. Readers can indefinitely acquire the lock unless the writer fully acquired the lock, which might never happen if there is always a reader in the critical section owning the lock. Mel Gorman reported that since LTP-20220121 the dio_truncate test case went from having 1 reader to having 16 readers and that number of readers is sufficient to prevent the down_write ever succeeding while readers exist. Eventually the test is killed after 30 minutes as a failure. Mel proposed a timeout to limit how long a writer can be blocked until the reader is forced into the slowpath. Thomas argued that there is no added value by providing this timeout. From a PREEMPT_RT point of view, there are no critical rw_semaphore or rwlock_t locks left where the reader must be preferred. Mitigate indefinite writer starvation by forcing the READER into the slowpath once the WRITER attempts to acquire the lock. Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/877cwbq4cq.ffs@tglx Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321161140.HMcQEhHb@linutronix.de Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 
On PREEMPT_RT, rw_semaphore and rwlock_t locks are unfair to writers.
Readers can indefinitely acquire the lock unless the writer fully acquired
the lock, which might never happen if there is always a reader in the
critical section owning the lock.

Mel Gorman reported that since LTP-20220121 the dio_truncate test case
went from having 1 reader to having 16 readers and that number of readers
is sufficient to prevent the down_write ever succeeding while readers
exist. Eventually the test is killed after 30 minutes as a failure.

Mel proposed a timeout to limit how long a writer can be blocked until
the reader is forced into the slowpath.

Thomas argued that there is no added value by providing this timeout.  From
a PREEMPT_RT point of view, there are no critical rw_semaphore or rwlock_t
locks left where the reader must be preferred.

Mitigate indefinite writer starvation by forcing the READER into the
slowpath once the WRITER attempts to acquire the lock.

Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/877cwbq4cq.ffs@tglx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321161140.HMcQEhHb@linutronix.de
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Merge tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux 2023-04-24T19:16:14+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2023-04-24T19:16:14+00:00 5dfb75e842e0ef59fc7bf307e5c52eab215bdb4c Pull RCU updates from Joel Fernandes: - Updates and additions to MAINTAINERS files, with Boqun being added to the RCU entry and Zqiang being added as an RCU reviewer. I have also transitioned from reviewer to maintainer; however, Paul will be taking over sending RCU pull-requests for the next merge window. - Resolution of hotplug warning in nohz code, achieved by fixing cpu_is_hotpluggable() through interaction with the nohz subsystem. Tick dependency modifications by Zqiang, focusing on fixing usage of the TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask. - Avoid needless calls to the rcu-lazy shrinker for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n kernels, fixed by Zqiang. - Improvements to rcu-tasks stall reporting by Neeraj. - Initial renaming of k[v]free_rcu() to k[v]free_rcu_mightsleep() for increased robustness, affecting several components like mac802154, drbd, vmw_vmci, tracing, and more. A report by Eric Dumazet showed that the API could be unknowingly used in an atomic context, so we'd rather make sure they know what they're asking for by being explicit: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202052847.2623997-1-edumazet@google.com/ - Documentation updates, including corrections to spelling, clarifications in comments, and improvements to the srcu_size_state comments. - Better srcu_struct cache locality for readers, by adjusting the size of srcu_struct in support of SRCU usage by Christoph Hellwig. - Teach lockdep to detect deadlocks between srcu_read_lock() vs synchronize_srcu() contributed by Boqun. Previously lockdep could not detect such deadlocks, now it can. - Integration of rcutorture and rcu-related tools, targeted for v6.4 from Boqun's tree, featuring new SRCU deadlock scenarios, test_nmis module parameter, and more - Miscellaneous changes, various code cleanups and comment improvements * tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux: (71 commits) checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used mac802154: Rename kfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() rcuscale: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep() ext4/super: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep() net/mlx5: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep() net/sysctl: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() lib/test_vmalloc.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() tracing: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() misc: vmw_vmci: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() drbd: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access rcu: Avoid stack overflow due to __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() being kprobe-ed rcu-tasks: Report stalls during synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_postscan() rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked early rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp() rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernels rcu: Fix missing TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU_EXP dependency check rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask race rcu/trace: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy() tick/nohz: Fix cpu_is_hotpluggable() by checking with nohz subsystem ... 
Pull RCU updates from Joel Fernandes:

 - Updates and additions to MAINTAINERS files, with Boqun being added to
   the RCU entry and Zqiang being added as an RCU reviewer.

   I have also transitioned from reviewer to maintainer; however, Paul
   will be taking over sending RCU pull-requests for the next merge
   window.

 - Resolution of hotplug warning in nohz code, achieved by fixing
   cpu_is_hotpluggable() through interaction with the nohz subsystem.

   Tick dependency modifications by Zqiang, focusing on fixing usage of
   the TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask.

 - Avoid needless calls to the rcu-lazy shrinker for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n
   kernels, fixed by Zqiang.

 - Improvements to rcu-tasks stall reporting by Neeraj.

 - Initial renaming of k[v]free_rcu() to k[v]free_rcu_mightsleep() for
   increased robustness, affecting several components like mac802154,
   drbd, vmw_vmci, tracing, and more.

   A report by Eric Dumazet showed that the API could be unknowingly
   used in an atomic context, so we'd rather make sure they know what
   they're asking for by being explicit:

      https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202052847.2623997-1-edumazet@google.com/

 - Documentation updates, including corrections to spelling,
   clarifications in comments, and improvements to the srcu_size_state
   comments.

 - Better srcu_struct cache locality for readers, by adjusting the size
   of srcu_struct in support of SRCU usage by Christoph Hellwig.

 - Teach lockdep to detect deadlocks between srcu_read_lock() vs
   synchronize_srcu() contributed by Boqun.

   Previously lockdep could not detect such deadlocks, now it can.

 - Integration of rcutorture and rcu-related tools, targeted for v6.4
   from Boqun's tree, featuring new SRCU deadlock scenarios, test_nmis
   module parameter, and more

 - Miscellaneous changes, various code cleanups and comment improvements

* tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux: (71 commits)
  checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used
  mac802154: Rename kfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  rcuscale: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  ext4/super: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  net/mlx5: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  net/sysctl: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  lib/test_vmalloc.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  tracing: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  misc: vmw_vmci: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  drbd: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access
  rcu: Avoid stack overflow due to __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() being kprobe-ed
  rcu-tasks: Report stalls during synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_postscan()
  rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked early
  rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp()
  rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernels
  rcu: Fix missing TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU_EXP dependency check
  rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask race
  rcu/trace: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()
  tick/nohz: Fix cpu_is_hotpluggable() by checking with nohz subsystem
  ...
locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock 2023-03-27T18:16:04+00:00 Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com 2023-01-13T23:57:22+00:00 0471db447cb7de56bbe2fedd9256b4d2b8ef642a Lock scenario print is always a weak spot of lockdep splats. Improvement can be made if we rework the dependency search and the error printing. However without touching the graph search, we can improve a little for the circular deadlock case, since we have the to-be-added lock dependency, and know whether these two locks are read/write/sync. In order to know whether a held_lock is sync or not, a bit was "stolen" from ->references, which reduce our limit for the same lock class nesting from 2^12 to 2^11, and it should still be good enough. Besides, since we now have bit in held_lock for sync, we don't need the "hardirqoffs being 1" trick, and also we can avoid the __lock_release() if we jump out of __lock_acquire() before the held_lock stored. With these changes, a deadlock case evolved with read lock and sync gets a better print-out from: [...] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [...] [...] CPU0 CPU1 [...] ---- ---- [...] lock(srcuA); [...] lock(srcuB); [...] lock(srcuA); [...] lock(srcuB); to [...] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [...] [...] CPU0 CPU1 [...] ---- ---- [...] rlock(srcuA); [...] lock(srcuB); [...] lock(srcuA); [...] sync(srcuB); Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> 
Lock scenario print is always a weak spot of lockdep splats. Improvement
can be made if we rework the dependency search and the error printing.

However without touching the graph search, we can improve a little for
the circular deadlock case, since we have the to-be-added lock
dependency, and know whether these two locks are read/write/sync.

In order to know whether a held_lock is sync or not, a bit was
"stolen" from ->references, which reduce our limit for the same lock
class nesting from 2^12 to 2^11, and it should still be good enough.

Besides, since we now have bit in held_lock for sync, we don't need the
"hardirqoffs being 1" trick, and also we can avoid the __lock_release()
if we jump out of __lock_acquire() before the held_lock stored.

With these changes, a deadlock case evolved with read lock and sync gets
a better print-out from:

	[...]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
	[...]
	[...]        CPU0                    CPU1
	[...]        ----                    ----
	[...]   lock(srcuA);
	[...]                                lock(srcuB);
	[...]                                lock(srcuA);
	[...]   lock(srcuB);

to

	[...]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
	[...]
	[...]        CPU0                    CPU1
	[...]        ----                    ----
	[...]   rlock(srcuA);
	[...]                                lock(srcuB);
	[...]                                lock(srcuA);
	[...]   sync(srcuB);

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
locking: Reduce the number of locks in ww_mutex stress tests 2023-03-27T18:16:01+00:00 Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com 2023-03-12T19:04:48+00:00 60a1a64ec0c08e02f2cd4372cd3971e9d5eb2b37 The stress test in test_ww_mutex_init() uses 4095 locks since lockdep::reference has 12 bits, and since we are going to reduce it to 11 bits to support lock_sync(), and 2047 is still a reasonable number of the max nesting level for locks, so adjust the test. Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202302011445.9d99dae2-oliver.sang@intel.com Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> 
The stress test in test_ww_mutex_init() uses 4095 locks since
lockdep::reference has 12 bits, and since we are going to reduce it to
11 bits to support lock_sync(), and 2047 is still a reasonable number of
the max nesting level for locks, so adjust the test.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202302011445.9d99dae2-oliver.sang@intel.com
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_sync() 2023-03-27T18:15:23+00:00 Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com 2023-01-13T06:59:53+00:00 2f1f043e7bea3fbf4c1869df2f7a0312bc8ca2bf Currently, functions like synchronize_srcu() do not have lockdep annotations resembling those of other write-side locking primitives. Such annotations might look as follows: lock_acquire(); lock_release(); Such annotations would tell lockdep that synchronize_srcu() acts like an empty critical section that waits for other (read-side) critical sections to finish. This would definitely catch some deadlock, but as pointed out by Paul Mckenney [1], this could also introduce false positives because of irq-safe/unsafe detection. Of course, there are tricks could help with this: might_sleep(); // Existing statement in __synchronize_srcu(). if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) { local_irq_disable(); lock_acquire(); lock_release(); local_irq_enable(); } But it would be better for lockdep to provide a separate annonation for functions like synchronize_srcu(), so that people won't need to repeat the ugly tricks above. Therefore introduce lock_sync(), which is simply an lock+unlock pair with no irq safe/unsafe deadlock check. This works because the to-be-annontated functions do not create real critical sections, and there is therefore no way that irq can create extra dependencies. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180412021233.ewncg5jjuzjw3x62@tardis/ Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> [ boqun: Fix typos reported by Davidlohr Bueso and Paul E. Mckenney ] Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> 
Currently, functions like synchronize_srcu() do not have lockdep
annotations resembling those of other write-side locking primitives.
Such annotations might look as follows:

	lock_acquire();
	lock_release();

Such annotations would tell lockdep that synchronize_srcu() acts like
an empty critical section that waits for other (read-side) critical
sections to finish.  This would definitely catch some deadlock, but
as pointed out by Paul Mckenney [1], this could also introduce false
positives because of irq-safe/unsafe detection.  Of course, there are
tricks could help with this:

	might_sleep(); // Existing statement in __synchronize_srcu().
	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
		local_irq_disable();
		lock_acquire();
		lock_release();
		local_irq_enable();
	}

But it would be better for lockdep to provide a separate annonation for
functions like synchronize_srcu(), so that people won't need to repeat
the ugly tricks above.

Therefore introduce lock_sync(), which is simply an lock+unlock
pair with no irq safe/unsafe deadlock check.  This works because the
to-be-annontated functions do not create real critical sections, and
there is therefore no way that irq can create extra dependencies.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180412021233.ewncg5jjuzjw3x62@tardis/

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ boqun: Fix typos reported by Davidlohr Bueso and Paul E. Mckenney ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
locktorture: Add raw_spinlock* torture tests for PREEMPT_RT kernels 2023-03-07T18:13:57+00:00 Zqiang qiang1.zhang@intel.com 2023-02-24T01:20:35+00:00 5d65cf6ae6aea1a8d533d4499201a13d0068a0dc In PREEMPT_RT kernels, both spin_lock() and spin_lock_irq() are converted to sleepable rt_spin_lock(). This means that the interrupt related suffixes for spin_lock/unlock(_irq, irqsave/irqrestore) do not affect the CPU's interrupt state. This commit therefore adds raw spin-lock torture tests. This in turn permits pure spin locks to be tested in PREEMPT_RT kernels. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> 
In PREEMPT_RT kernels, both spin_lock() and spin_lock_irq() are converted
to sleepable rt_spin_lock().  This means that the interrupt related
suffixes for spin_lock/unlock(_irq, irqsave/irqrestore) do not affect
the CPU's interrupt state. This commit therefore adds raw spin-lock
torture tests.  This in turn permits pure spin locks to be tested in
PREEMPT_RT kernels.

Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
locktorture: With nested locks, occasionally skip main lock 2023-03-07T18:13:57+00:00 John Stultz jstultz@google.com 2023-02-21T19:02:38+00:00 45bcf0bd8cbe163c5aec18570b6befd2193f1a57 If we're using nested locking to stress things, occasionally skip taking the main lock, so that we can get some different contention patterns between the writers (to hopefully get two disjoint blocked trees) Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: kernel-team@android.com Co-developed-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> 
If we're using nested locking to stress things, occasionally
skip taking the main lock, so that we can get some different
contention patterns between the writers (to hopefully get two
disjoint blocked trees)

Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Co-developed-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
locktorture: Add nested locking to rtmutex torture tests 2023-03-07T18:13:57+00:00 John Stultz jstultz@google.com 2023-02-21T19:02:37+00:00 ae4823e427954d30ab393888a334f9d1fd8cd597 This patch adds randomized nested locking to the rtmutex torture tests. Additionally it adds LOCK09 config files for testing rtmutexes with nested locking. Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: kernel-team@android.com Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Co-developed-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> 
This patch adds randomized nested locking to the rtmutex torture
tests. Additionally it adds LOCK09 config files for testing
rtmutexes with nested locking.

Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Co-developed-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture tests 2023-03-07T18:13:57+00:00 John Stultz jstultz@google.com 2023-02-21T19:02:36+00:00 3e5aeaf53422bdd79fecf89aa160f048114e013c This patch adds randomized nested locking to the mutex torture tests, as well as new LOCK08 config files for testing mutexes with nested locking Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: kernel-team@android.com Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Co-developed-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> 
This patch adds randomized nested locking to the mutex torture
tests, as well as new LOCK08 config files for testing mutexes
with nested locking

Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Co-developed-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>