linux-toradex.git/kernel/ptrace.c, branch v3.0.75

ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL

2013-03-03T22:09:06+00:00

Upstream commit 9899d11f654474d2d54ea52ceaa2a1f4db3abd68.

putreg() assumes that the tracee is not running and pt_regs_access() can
safely play with its stack.  However a killed tracee can return from
ptrace_stop() to the low-level asm code and do RESTORE_REST, this means
that debugger can actually read/modify the kernel stack until the tracee
does SAVE_REST again.

set_task_blockstep() can race with SIGKILL too and in some sense this
race is even worse, the very fact the tracee can be woken up breaks the
logic.

As Linus suggested we can clear TASK_WAKEKILL around the arch_ptrace()
call, this ensures that nobody can ever wakeup the tracee while the
debugger looks at it.  Not only this fixes the mentioned problems, we
can do some cleanups/simplifications in arch_ptrace() paths.

Probably ptrace_unfreeze_traced() needs more callers, for example it
makes sense to make the tracee killable for oom-killer before
access_process_vm().

While at it, add the comment into may_ptrace_stop() to explain why
ptrace_stop() still can't rely on SIGKILL and signal_pending_state().

Reported-by: Salman Qazi 
Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal 
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ptrace: introduce signal_wake_up_state() and ptrace_signal_wake_up()

2013-03-03T22:09:05+00:00

Upstream commit 910ffdb18a6408e14febbb6e4b6840fd2c928c82.

Cleanup and preparation for the next change.

signal_wake_up(resume => true) is overused. None of ptrace/jctl callers
actually want to wakeup a TASK_WAKEKILL task, but they can't specify the
necessary mask.

Turn signal_wake_up() into signal_wake_up_state(state), reintroduce
signal_wake_up() as a trivial helper, and add ptrace_signal_wake_up()
which adds __TASK_TRACED.

This way ptrace_signal_wake_up() can work "inside" ptrace_request()
even if the tracee doesn't have the TASK_WAKEKILL bit set.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ptrace: ptrace_resume() shouldn't wake up !TASK_TRACED thread

2011-05-25T17:20:21+00:00

It is not clear why ptrace_resume() does wake_up_process(). Unless the
caller is PTRACE_KILL the tracee should be TASK_TRACED so we can use
wake_up_state(__TASK_TRACED). If sys_ptrace() races with SIGKILL we do
not need the extra and potentionally spurious wakeup.

If the caller is PTRACE_KILL, wake_up_process() is even more wrong.
The tracee can sleep in any state in any place, and if we have a buggy
code which doesn't handle a spurious wakeup correctly PTRACE_KILL can
be used to exploit it. For example:

	int main(void)
	{
		int child, status;

		child = fork();
		if (!child) {
			int ret;

			assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0,0,0) == 0);

			ret = pause();
			printf("pause: %d %m\n", ret);

			return 0x23;
		}

		sleep(1);
		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_KILL, child, 0,0) == 0);

		assert(child == wait(&status));
		printf("wait: %x\n", status);

		return 0;
	}

prints "pause: -1 Unknown error 514", -ERESTARTNOHAND leaks to the
userland. In this case sys_pause() is buggy as well and should be
fixed.

I do not know what was the original rationality behind PTRACE_KILL.
The man page is simply wrong and afaics it was always wrong. Imho
it should be deprecated, or may be it should do send_sig(SIGKILL)
as Denys suggests, but in any case I do not think that the current
behaviour was intentional.

Note: there is another problem, ptrace_resume() changes ->exit_code
and this can race with SIGKILL too. Eventually we should change ptrace
to not use ->exit_code.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov

Merge branch 'ptrace' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/oleg/misc

2011-05-20T20:33:21+00:00

* 'ptrace' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/oleg/misc: (41 commits)
  signal: trivial, fix the "timespec declared inside parameter list" warning
  job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped()
  ptrace: fix signal->wait_chldexit usage in task_clear_group_stop_trapping()
  signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending()
  signal: cleanup sys_sigprocmask()
  signal: rename signandsets() to sigandnsets()
  signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending()
  signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code
  signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic
  signal: cleanup sys_rt_sigprocmask()
  x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() should use set_current_blocked()
  x86: signal: handle_signal() should use set_current_blocked()
  signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()
  signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of ->siglock
  signal: retarget_shared_pending: optimize while_each_thread() loop
  signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only
  signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending()
  ptrace: ptrace_check_attach() should not do s/STOPPED/TRACED/
  signal: Turn SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED into GROUP_STOP_DEQUEUED
  signal: do_signal_stop: Remove the unneeded task_clear_group_stop_pending()
  ...

ptrace: Prepare to fix racy accesses on task breakpoints

2011-04-25T15:28:24+00:00

When a task is traced and is in a stopped state, the tracer
may execute a ptrace request to examine the tracee state and
get its task struct. Right after, the tracee can be killed
and thus its breakpoints released.
This can happen concurrently when the tracer is in the middle
of reading or modifying these breakpoints, leading to dereferencing
a freed pointer.

Hence, to prepare the fix, create a generic breakpoint reference
holding API. When a reference on the breakpoints of a task is
held, the breakpoints won't be released until the last reference
is dropped. After that, no more ptrace request on the task's
breakpoints can be serviced for the tracer.

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: Prasad 
Cc: Paul Mundt 
Cc: v2.6.33.. 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302284067-7860-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com

Merge branch 'ptrace' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc into ptrace

2011-04-07T18:44:11+00:00

ptrace: ptrace_check_attach() should not do s/STOPPED/TRACED/

2011-04-04T00:11:05+00:00

After "ptrace: Clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED"
d79fdd6d96f46fabb779d86332e3677c6f5c2a4f, ptrace_check_attach()
should never see a TASK_STOPPED tracee and s/STOPPED/TRACED/ is
no longer legal. Add the warning.

Note: ptrace_check_attach() can be greatly simplified, in particular
it doesn't need tasklist. But I'd prefer another patch for that.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo

userns: allow ptrace from non-init user namespaces

2011-03-24T02:47:05+00:00

ptrace is allowed to tasks in the same user namespace according to the
usual rules (i.e.  the same rules as for two tasks in the init user
namespace).  ptrace is also allowed to a user namespace to which the
current task the has CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability.

Changelog:
	Dec 31: Address feedback by Eric:
		. Correct ptrace uid check
		. Rename may_ptrace_ns to ptrace_capable
		. Also fix the cap_ptrace checks.
	Jan  1: Use const cred struct
	Jan 11: use task_ns_capable() in place of ptrace_capable().
	Feb 23: same_or_ancestore_user_ns() was not an appropriate
		check to constrain cap_issubset.  Rather, cap_issubset()
		only is meaningful when both capsets are in the same
		user_ns.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn 
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" 
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano 
Acked-by: David Howells 
Cc: James Morris 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ptrace: Always put ptracee into appropriate execution state

2011-03-23T09:37:01+00:00

Currently, __ptrace_unlink() wakes up the tracee iff it's in
TASK_TRACED.  For unlinking from PTRACE_DETACH, this is correct as the
tracee is guaranteed to be in TASK_TRACED or dead; however, unlinking
also happens when the ptracer exits and in this case the ptracee can
be in any state and ptrace might be left running even if the group it
belongs to is stopped.

This patch updates __ptrace_unlink() such that GROUP_STOP_PENDING is
reinstated regardless of the ptracee's current state as long as it's
alive and makes sure that signal_wake_up() is called if execution
state transition is necessary.

Test case follows.

  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 

  static const struct timespec ts1s = { .tv_sec = 1 };

  int main(void)
  {
	  pid_t tracee;
	  siginfo_t si;

	  tracee = fork();
	  if (tracee == 0) {
		  while (1) {
			  nanosleep(&ts1s, NULL);
			  write(1, ".", 1);
		  }
	  }

	  ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, tracee, NULL, NULL);
	  waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
	  ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, tracee, NULL, (void *)(long)si.si_status);
	  waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
	  ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, tracee, NULL, (void *)(long)si.si_status);
	  write(1, "exiting", 7);
	  return 0;
  }

Before the patch, after the parent process exits, the child is left
running and prints out "." every second.

  exiting..... (continues)

After the patch, the group stop initiated by the implied SIGSTOP from
PTRACE_ATTACH is re-established when the parent exits.

  exiting

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo 
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov

ptrace: Collapse ptrace_untrace() into __ptrace_unlink()

2011-03-23T09:37:01+00:00

Remove the extra task_is_traced() check in __ptrace_unlink() and
collapse ptrace_untrace() into __ptrace_unlink().  This is to prepare
for further changes.

While at it, drop the comment on top of ptrace_untrace() and convert
__ptrace_unlink() comment to docbook format.  Detailed comment will be
added by the next patch.

This patch doesn't cause any visible behavior changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo 
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov