doc.2024.06.06a: Documentation updates. fixes.2024.07.04a: Miscellaneous fixes. mb.2024.06.28a: Grace-period memory-barrier redundancy removal. nocb.2024.06.03a: No-CB CPU updates. rcu-tasks.2024.06.06a: RCU-Tasks updates. rcutorture.2024.06.06a: Torture-test updates. srcu.2024.06.18a: SRCU polled-grace-period updates.
When rcu_barrier() calls rcu_rdp_cpu_online() and observes a CPU off
rnp->qsmaskinitnext, it means that all accesses from the offline CPU
preceding the CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU are visible to RCU barrier, including
callbacks expiration and counter updates.
However interrupts can still fire after stop_machine() re-enables
interrupts and before rcutree_report_cpu_dead(). The related accesses
happening between CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU and rnp->qsmaskinitnext clearing
are _NOT_ guaranteed to be seen by rcu_barrier() without proper
ordering, especially when callbacks are invoked there to the end, making
rcutree_migrate_callback() bypass barrier_lock.
The following theoretical race example can make rcu_barrier() hang:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
//cpu_down()
smpboot_park_threads()
//ksoftirqd is parked now
<IRQ>
rcu_sched_clock_irq()
invoke_rcu_core()
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
// callback storm
// rcu_do_batch() returns
// before completing all
// of them
// do_softirq also returns early because of
// timeout. It defers to ksoftirqd but
// it's parked
</IRQ>
stop_machine()
take_cpu_down()
rcu_barrier()
spin_lock(barrier_lock)
// observes rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist) != 0
<IRQ>
do_softirq()
rcu_core()
rcu_do_batch()
//completes all pending callbacks
//smp_mb() implied _after_ callback number dec
</IRQ>
rcutree_report_cpu_dead()
rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~rdp->grpmask;
rcutree_migrate_callback()
// no callback, early return without locking
// barrier_lock
//observes !rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp)
rcu_barrier_entrain()
rcu_segcblist_entrain()
// Observe rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(rsclp) == 0
// because no barrier between reading
// rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len
rcu_segcblist_add_len()
smp_mb__before_atomic()
// will now observe the 0 count and empty
// list, but too late, we enqueue regardless
WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + v);
// ignored barrier callback
// rcu barrier stall...
This could be solved with a read memory barrier, enforcing the message
passing between rnp->qsmaskinitnext and rsclp->len, matching the full
memory barrier after rsclp->len addition in rcu_segcblist_add_len()
performed at the end of rcu_do_batch().
However the rcu_barrier() is complicated enough and probably doesn't
need too many more subtleties. CPU down is a slowpath and the
barrier_lock seldom contended. Solve the issue with unconditionally
locking the barrier_lock on rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). This makes sure
that either rcu_barrier() sees the empty queue or its entrained
callback will be migrated.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
If a CPU is running either a userspace application or a guest OS in nohz_full mode, it is possible for a system call to occur just as an RCU grace period is starting. If that CPU also has the scheduling-clock tick enabled for any reason (such as a second runnable task), and if the system was booted with rcutree.use_softirq=0, then RCU can add insult to injury by awakening that CPU's rcuc kthread, resulting in yet another task and yet more OS jitter due to switching to that task, running it, and switching back. In addition, in the common case where that system call is not of excessively long duration, awakening the rcuc task is pointless. This pointlessness is due to the fact that the CPU will enter an extended quiescent state upon returning to the userspace application or guest OS. In this case, the rcuc kthread cannot do anything that the main RCU grace-period kthread cannot do on its behalf, at least if it is given a few additional milliseconds (for example, given the time duration specified by rcutree.jiffies_till_first_fqs, give or take scheduling delays). This commit therefore adds a rcutree.nohz_full_patience_delay kernel boot parameter that specifies the grace period age (in milliseconds, rounded to jiffies) before which RCU will refrain from awakening the rcuc kthread. Preliminary experimentation suggests a value of 1000, that is, one second. Increasing rcutree.nohz_full_patience_delay will increase grace-period latency and in turn increase memory footprint, so systems with constrained memory might choose a smaller value. Systems with less-aggressive OS-jitter requirements might choose the default value of zero, which keeps the traditional immediate-wakeup behavior, thus avoiding increases in grace-period latency. [ paulmck: Apply Leonardo Bras feedback. ] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240328171949.743211-1-leobras@redhat.com/ Reported-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
RCU stall printout fetches the EQS state of a CPU with a preceding full memory barrier. However there is nothing to order this read against at this debugging stage. It is inherently racy when performed remotely. Do a plain read instead. This was the last user of rcu_dynticks_snap(). Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
When the boot CPU initializes the per-CPU data on behalf of all possible CPUs, a sanity check is performed on each of them to make sure none is initialized in an extended quiescent state. This check involves a full memory barrier which is useless at this early boot stage. Do a plain access instead. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
When the grace period kthread checks the extended quiescent state counter of a CPU, full ordering is necessary to ensure that either: * If the GP kthread observes the remote target in an extended quiescent state, then that target must observe all accesses prior to the current grace period, including the current grace period sequence number, once it exits that extended quiescent state. or: * If the GP kthread observes the remote target NOT in an extended quiescent state, then the target further entering in an extended quiescent state must observe all accesses prior to the current grace period, including the current grace period sequence number, once it enters that extended quiescent state. This ordering is enforced through a full memory barrier placed right before taking the first EQS snapshot. However this is superfluous because the snapshot is taken while holding the target's rnp lock which provides the necessary ordering through its chain of smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(). Remove the needless explicit barrier before the snapshot and put a comment about the implicit barrier newly relied upon here. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
When the grace period kthread checks the extended quiescent state
counter of a CPU, full ordering is necessary to ensure that either:
* If the GP kthread observes the remote target in an extended quiescent
state, then that target must observe all accesses prior to the current
grace period, including the current grace period sequence number, once
it exits that extended quiescent state. Also the GP kthread must
observe all accesses performed by the target prior it entering in
EQS.
or:
* If the GP kthread observes the remote target NOT in an extended
quiescent state, then the target further entering in an extended
quiescent state must observe all accesses prior to the current
grace period, including the current grace period sequence number, once
it enters that extended quiescent state. Also the GP kthread later
observing that EQS must also observe all accesses performed by the
target prior it entering in EQS.
This ordering is explicitly performed both on the first EQS snapshot
and on the second one as well through the combination of a preceding
full barrier followed by an acquire read. However the second snapshot's
full memory barrier is redundant and not needed to enforce the above
guarantees:
GP kthread Remote target
---- -----
// Access prior GP
WRITE_ONCE(A, 1)
// first snapshot
smp_mb()
x = smp_load_acquire(EQS)
// Access prior GP
WRITE_ONCE(B, 1)
// EQS enter
// implied full barrier by atomic_add_return()
atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICKS_IDX, EQS)
// implied full barrier by atomic_add_return()
READ_ONCE(A)
// second snapshot
y = smp_load_acquire(EQS)
z = READ_ONCE(B)
If the GP kthread above fails to observe the remote target in EQS
(x not in EQS), the remote target will observe A == 1 after further
entering in EQS. Then the second snapshot taken by the GP kthread only
need to be an acquire read in order to observe z == 1.
Therefore remove the needless full memory barrier on second snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Interrupts are enabled in rcu_gp_init(), so this commit switches from local_irq_save() and local_irq_restore() to local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/febb13ab-a4bb-48b4-8e97-7e9f7749e6da@moroto.mountain/ Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
In the synchronize_rcu() common case, we will have less than SR_MAX_USERS_WAKE_FROM_GP number of users per GP. Waking up the kworker is pointless just to free the last injected wait head since at that point, all the users have already been awakened. Introduce a new counter to track this and prevent the wakeup in the common case. [ paulmck: Remove atomic_dec_return_release in cannot-happen state. ] Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
fixes.2024.04.15a: RCU fixes misc.2024.04.12a: Miscellaneous fixes rcu-sync-normal-improve.2024.04.15a: Improving synchronize_rcu() call rcu-tasks.2024.04.15a: Tasks RCU updates rcutorture.2024.04.15a: Torture-test updates