linux-toradex.git/kernel/rcutree.c, branch T20_LinuxImageV2.0Beta1_20121218 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules rcu: Prevent RCU callbacks from executing before scheduler initialized 2011-07-13T15:17:56+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paul.mckenney@linaro.org 2011-07-10T22:57:35+00:00 b0d304172f49061b4ff78f9e2b02719ac69c8a7e Under some rare but real combinations of configuration parameters, RCU callbacks are posted during early boot that use kernel facilities that are not yet initialized. Therefore, when these callbacks are invoked, hard hangs and crashes ensue. This commit therefore prevents RCU callbacks from being invoked until after the scheduler is fully up and running, as in after multiple tasks have been spawned. It might well turn out that a better approach is to identify the specific RCU callbacks that are causing this problem, but that discussion will wait until such time as someone really needs an RCU callback to be invoked (as opposed to merely registered) during early boot. Reported-by: julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com> Reported-by: RKK <kulkarni.ravi4@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Tested-by: julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com> Tested-by: RKK <kulkarni.ravi4@gmail.com> 
Under some rare but real combinations of configuration parameters, RCU
callbacks are posted during early boot that use kernel facilities that
are not yet initialized.  Therefore, when these callbacks are invoked,
hard hangs and crashes ensue.  This commit therefore prevents RCU
callbacks from being invoked until after the scheduler is fully up and
running, as in after multiple tasks have been spawned.

It might well turn out that a better approach is to identify the specific
RCU callbacks that are causing this problem, but that discussion will
wait until such time as someone really needs an RCU callback to be invoked
(as opposed to merely registered) during early boot.

Reported-by: julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com>
Reported-by: RKK <kulkarni.ravi4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Tested-by: julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com>
Tested-by: RKK <kulkarni.ravi4@gmail.com>
rcu: Move RCU_BOOST #ifdefs to header file 2011-06-16T23:12:05+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paul.mckenney@linaro.org 2011-06-16T15:26:32+00:00 f8b7fc6b514f34a51875dd48dff70d4d17a54f38 The commit "use softirq instead of kthreads except when RCU_BOOST=y" just applied #ifdef in place. This commit is a cleanup that moves the newly #ifdef'ed code to the header file kernel/rcutree_plugin.h. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
The commit "use softirq instead of kthreads except when RCU_BOOST=y"
just applied #ifdef in place.  This commit is a cleanup that moves
the newly #ifdef'ed code to the header file kernel/rcutree_plugin.h.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: use softirq instead of kthreads except when RCU_BOOST=y 2011-06-16T06:07:21+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2011-06-15T22:47:09+00:00 a46e0899eec7a3069bcadd45dfba7bf67c6ed016 This patch #ifdefs RCU kthreads out of the kernel unless RCU_BOOST=y, thus eliminating context-switch overhead if RCU priority boosting has not been configured. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
This patch #ifdefs RCU kthreads out of the kernel unless RCU_BOOST=y,
thus eliminating context-switch overhead if RCU priority boosting has
not been configured.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Use softirq to address performance regression 2011-06-14T22:25:39+00:00 Shaohua Li shaohua.li@intel.com 2011-06-14T05:26:25+00:00 09223371deac67d08ca0b70bd18787920284c967 Commit a26ac2455ffcf3(rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread) introduced performance regression. In an AIM7 test, this commit degraded performance by about 40%. The commit runs rcu callbacks in a kthread instead of softirq. We observed high rate of context switch which is caused by this. Out test system has 64 CPUs and HZ is 1000, so we saw more than 64k context switch per second which is caused by RCU's per-CPU kthread. A trace showed that most of the time the RCU per-CPU kthread doesn't actually handle any callbacks, but instead just does a very small amount of work handling grace periods. This means that RCU's per-CPU kthreads are making the scheduler do quite a bit of work in order to allow a very small amount of RCU-related processing to be done. Alex Shi's analysis determined that this slowdown is due to lock contention within the scheduler. Unfortunately, as Peter Zijlstra points out, the scheduler's real-time semantics require global action, which means that this contention is inherent in real-time scheduling. (Yes, perhaps someone will come up with a workaround -- otherwise, -rt is not going to do well on large SMP systems -- but this patch will work around this issue in the meantime. And "the meantime" might well be forever.) This patch therefore re-introduces softirq processing to RCU, but only for core RCU work. RCU callbacks are still executed in kthread context, so that only a small amount of RCU work runs in softirq context in the common case. This should minimize ksoftirqd execution, allowing us to skip boosting of ksoftirqd for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y kernels. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Tested-by: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 
Commit a26ac2455ffcf3(rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread)
introduced performance regression. In an AIM7 test, this commit degraded
performance by about 40%.

The commit runs rcu callbacks in a kthread instead of softirq. We observed
high rate of context switch which is caused by this. Out test system has
64 CPUs and HZ is 1000, so we saw more than 64k context switch per second
which is caused by RCU's per-CPU kthread.  A trace showed that most of
the time the RCU per-CPU kthread doesn't actually handle any callbacks,
but instead just does a very small amount of work handling grace periods.
This means that RCU's per-CPU kthreads are making the scheduler do quite
a bit of work in order to allow a very small amount of RCU-related
processing to be done.

Alex Shi's analysis determined that this slowdown is due to lock
contention within the scheduler.  Unfortunately, as Peter Zijlstra points
out, the scheduler's real-time semantics require global action, which
means that this contention is inherent in real-time scheduling.  (Yes,
perhaps someone will come up with a workaround -- otherwise, -rt is not
going to do well on large SMP systems -- but this patch will work around
this issue in the meantime.  And "the meantime" might well be forever.)

This patch therefore re-introduces softirq processing to RCU, but only
for core RCU work.  RCU callbacks are still executed in kthread context,
so that only a small amount of RCU work runs in softirq context in the
common case.  This should minimize ksoftirqd execution, allowing us to
skip boosting of ksoftirqd for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y kernels.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Tested-by: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Simplify curing of load woes 2011-06-14T22:25:15+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2011-05-31T03:38:55+00:00 9a432736904d386cda28b987b38ba14dae960ecc Make the functions creating the kthreads wake them up. Leverage the fact that the per-node and boost kthreads can run anywhere, thus dispensing with the need to wake them up once the incoming CPU has gone fully online. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> 
Make the functions creating the kthreads wake them up.  Leverage the
fact that the per-node and boost kthreads can run anywhere, thus
dispensing with the need to wake them up once the incoming CPU has
gone fully online.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
rcu: Cure load woes 2011-05-31T08:01:48+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2011-05-30T11:34:51+00:00 d72bce0e67e8afc6eb959f656013cbb577426f1e Commit cc3ce5176d83 (rcu: Start RCU kthreads in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state) fudges a sleeping task' state, resulting in the scheduler seeing a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE task going to sleep, but a TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE task waking up. The result is unbalanced load calculation. The problem that patch tried to address is that the RCU threads could stay in UNINTERRUPTIBLE state for quite a while and triggering the hung task detector due to on-demand wake-ups. Cure the problem differently by always giving the tasks at least one wake-up once the CPU is fully up and running, this will kick them out of the initial UNINTERRUPTIBLE state and into the regular INTERRUPTIBLE wait state. [ The alternative would be teaching kthread_create() to start threads as INTERRUPTIBLE but that needs a tad more thought. ] Reported-by: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306755291.1200.2872.camel@twins Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 
Commit cc3ce5176d83 (rcu: Start RCU kthreads in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state) fudges a sleeping task' state, resulting in the scheduler seeing
a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE task going to sleep, but a TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
task waking up. The result is unbalanced load calculation.

The problem that patch tried to address is that the RCU threads could
stay in UNINTERRUPTIBLE state for quite a while and triggering the hung
task detector due to on-demand wake-ups.

Cure the problem differently by always giving the tasks at least one
wake-up once the CPU is fully up and running, this will kick them out of
the initial UNINTERRUPTIBLE state and into the regular INTERRUPTIBLE
wait state.

[ The alternative would be teaching kthread_create() to start threads as
  INTERRUPTIBLE but that needs a tad more thought. ]

Reported-by: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306755291.1200.2872.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
rcu: Start RCU kthreads in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state 2011-05-28T15:41:56+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paul.mckenney@linaro.org 2011-05-25T20:42:06+00:00 cc3ce5176d83cd8ae1134f86e208ea758d6cb78e Upon creation, kthreads are in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state, which can result in softlockup warnings. Because some of RCU's kthreads can legitimately be idle indefinitely, start them in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state in order to avoid those warnings. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 
Upon creation, kthreads are in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state, which can
result in softlockup warnings.  Because some of RCU's kthreads can
legitimately be idle indefinitely, start them in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state in order to avoid those warnings.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
rcu: Remove waitqueue usage for cpu, node, and boost kthreads 2011-05-28T15:41:52+00:00 Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl 2011-05-20T23:06:29+00:00 08bca60a6912ad225254250c0a9c3a05b4152cfa It is not necessary to use waitqueues for the RCU kthreads because we always know exactly which thread is to be awakened. In addition, wake_up() only issues an actual wakeup when there is a thread waiting on the queue, which was why there was an extra explicit wake_up_process() to get the RCU kthreads started. Eliminating the waitqueues (and wake_up()) in favor of wake_up_process() eliminates the need for the initial wake_up_process() and also shrinks the data structure size a bit. The wakeup logic is placed in a new rcu_wait() macro. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 
It is not necessary to use waitqueues for the RCU kthreads because
we always know exactly which thread is to be awakened.  In addition,
wake_up() only issues an actual wakeup when there is a thread waiting on
the queue, which was why there was an extra explicit wake_up_process()
to get the RCU kthreads started.

Eliminating the waitqueues (and wake_up()) in favor of wake_up_process()
eliminates the need for the initial wake_up_process() and also shrinks
the data structure size a bit.  The wakeup logic is placed in a new
rcu_wait() macro.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
rcu: Avoid acquiring rcu_node locks in timer functions 2011-05-28T15:41:49+00:00 Paul E. McKenney paul.mckenney@linaro.org 2011-05-11T12:41:41+00:00 8826f3b0397562eee6f8785d548be9dfdb169100 This commit switches manipulations of the rcu_node ->wakemask field to atomic operations, which allows rcu_cpu_kthread_timer() to avoid acquiring the rcu_node lock. This should avoid the following lockdep splat reported by Valdis Kletnieks: [ 12.872150] usb 1-4: new high speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd [ 12.986667] usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=413c, idProduct=2513 [ 12.986679] usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0, SerialNumber=0 [ 12.987691] hub 1-4:1.0: USB hub found [ 12.987877] hub 1-4:1.0: 3 ports detected [ 12.996372] input: PS/2 Generic Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input10 [ 13.071471] udevadm used greatest stack depth: 3984 bytes left [ 13.172129] [ 13.172130] ======================================================= [ 13.172425] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 13.172650] 2.6.39-rc6-mmotm0506 #1 [ 13.172773] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 13.172997] blkid/267 is trying to acquire lock: [ 13.173009] (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81032d8f>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] but task is already holding lock: [ 13.173009] (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810901cc>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x27/0x58 [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] -> #2 (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}: [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff815697f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81090794>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8109092c>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x4f/0xd7 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81027bd3>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8102cc34>] cpuacct_charge+0x6c/0x75 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81030cc6>] update_curr+0x101/0x12e [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810311d0>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xf7/0x23b [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8102acb3>] check_preempt_curr+0x2b/0x68 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81031d40>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x76/0x128 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81031e49>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.63+0x57/0x5c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81031e96>] scheduler_ipi+0x48/0x5d [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810177d5>] smp_reschedule_interrupt+0x16/0x18 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff815710f3>] reschedule_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810b66d1>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810b739c>] find_get_page+0xa9/0xb9 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810b8b48>] filemap_fault+0x6a/0x34d [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d1a25>] __do_fault+0x54/0x3e6 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d447a>] handle_pte_fault+0x12c/0x1ed [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d48f7>] handle_mm_fault+0x1cd/0x1e0 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8156cfee>] do_page_fault+0x42d/0x5de [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8156a75f>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30 [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff815697f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81027e19>] __task_rq_lock+0x8b/0xd3 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032f7f>] wake_up_new_task+0x41/0x108 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810376c3>] do_fork+0x265/0x33f [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81007d02>] kernel_thread+0x6b/0x6d [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8153a9dd>] rest_init+0x21/0xd2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81b1db4f>] start_kernel+0x3bb/0x3c6 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81b1d29f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81b1d393>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf0/0xf7 [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81067788>] check_prev_add+0x68/0x20e [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff815698ea>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x57 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032d8f>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032f3c>] wake_up_process+0x10/0x12 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810901e9>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x44/0x58 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81045286>] call_timer_fn+0xac/0x1e9 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8104556d>] run_timer_softirq+0x1aa/0x1f2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8103e487>] __do_softirq+0x109/0x26a [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8157144c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81003207>] do_softirq+0x44/0xf1 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8103e8b9>] irq_exit+0x58/0xc8 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81017f5a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x87 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81570fd3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810bd51a>] get_page_from_freelist+0x2aa/0x310 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810bdf03>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x178/0x243 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8101fe2f>] pte_alloc_one+0x1e/0x3a [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d27fe>] __pte_alloc+0x22/0x14b [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d48a8>] handle_mm_fault+0x17e/0x1e0 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8156cfee>] do_page_fault+0x42d/0x5de [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8156a75f>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30 [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] other info that might help us debug this: [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] Chain exists of: [ 13.173009] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> rcu_node_level_0 [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] CPU0 CPU1 [ 13.173009] ---- ---- [ 13.173009] lock(rcu_node_level_0); [ 13.173009] lock(&rq->lock); [ 13.173009] lock(rcu_node_level_0); [ 13.173009] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] 3 locks held by blkid/267: [ 13.173009] #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8156cdb4>] do_page_fault+0x1f3/0x5de [ 13.173009] #1: (&yield_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810451da>] call_timer_fn+0x0/0x1e9 [ 13.173009] #2: (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810901cc>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x27/0x58 [ 13.173009] [ 13.173009] stack backtrace: [ 13.173009] Pid: 267, comm: blkid Not tainted 2.6.39-rc6-mmotm0506 #1 [ 13.173009] Call Trace: [ 13.173009] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8154a529>] print_circular_bug+0xc8/0xd9 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81067788>] check_prev_add+0x68/0x20e [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8100c861>] ? save_stack_trace+0x28/0x46 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032d8f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032d8f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff815698ea>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x57 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032d8f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032d8f>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81032f3c>] wake_up_process+0x10/0x12 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810901e9>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x44/0x58 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81045286>] call_timer_fn+0xac/0x1e9 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810451da>] ? del_timer+0x75/0x75 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8104556d>] run_timer_softirq+0x1aa/0x1f2 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8103e487>] __do_softirq+0x109/0x26a [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8106365f>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x37/0xf6 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810a0e4a>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x1b/0x2f [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8157144c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81003207>] do_softirq+0x44/0xf1 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8103e8b9>] irq_exit+0x58/0xc8 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81017f5a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x87 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81570fd3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 13.173009] <EOI> [<ffffffff810bd384>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x114/0x310 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810bd51a>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x2aa/0x310 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff812220e7>] ? clear_page_c+0x7/0x10 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810bd1ef>] ? prep_new_page+0x14c/0x1cd [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810bd51a>] get_page_from_freelist+0x2aa/0x310 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810bdf03>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x178/0x243 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d46b9>] ? __pmd_alloc+0x87/0x99 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8101fe2f>] pte_alloc_one+0x1e/0x3a [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d46b9>] ? __pmd_alloc+0x87/0x99 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d27fe>] __pte_alloc+0x22/0x14b [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d48a8>] handle_mm_fault+0x17e/0x1e0 [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8156cfee>] do_page_fault+0x42d/0x5de [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810d915f>] ? sys_brk+0x32/0x10c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff810a0e4a>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x1b/0x2f [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff81065c4f>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0x9c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff812235dd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c [ 13.173009] [<ffffffff8156a75f>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30 [ 14.010075] usb 5-1: new full speed USB device number 2 using uhci_hcd Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 
This commit switches manipulations of the rcu_node ->wakemask field
to atomic operations, which allows rcu_cpu_kthread_timer() to avoid
acquiring the rcu_node lock.  This should avoid the following lockdep
splat reported by Valdis Kletnieks:

[   12.872150] usb 1-4: new high speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd
[   12.986667] usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=413c, idProduct=2513
[   12.986679] usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0, SerialNumber=0
[   12.987691] hub 1-4:1.0: USB hub found
[   12.987877] hub 1-4:1.0: 3 ports detected
[   12.996372] input: PS/2 Generic Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input10
[   13.071471] udevadm used greatest stack depth: 3984 bytes left
[   13.172129]
[   13.172130] =======================================================
[   13.172425] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[   13.172650] 2.6.39-rc6-mmotm0506 #1
[   13.172773] -------------------------------------------------------
[   13.172997] blkid/267 is trying to acquire lock:
[   13.173009]  (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81032d8f>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] but task is already holding lock:
[   13.173009]  (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810901cc>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x27/0x58
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] -> #2 (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}:
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff815697f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81090794>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x8c/0x1d5
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8109092c>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x4f/0xd7
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81027bd3>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8102cc34>] cpuacct_charge+0x6c/0x75
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81030cc6>] update_curr+0x101/0x12e
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810311d0>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xf7/0x23b
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8102acb3>] check_preempt_curr+0x2b/0x68
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81031d40>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x76/0x128
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81031e49>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.63+0x57/0x5c
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81031e96>] scheduler_ipi+0x48/0x5d
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810177d5>] smp_reschedule_interrupt+0x16/0x18
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff815710f3>] reschedule_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810b66d1>] rcu_read_unlock+0x21/0x23
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810b739c>] find_get_page+0xa9/0xb9
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810b8b48>] filemap_fault+0x6a/0x34d
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810d1a25>] __do_fault+0x54/0x3e6
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810d447a>] handle_pte_fault+0x12c/0x1ed
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810d48f7>] handle_mm_fault+0x1cd/0x1e0
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8156cfee>] do_page_fault+0x42d/0x5de
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8156a75f>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff815697f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81027e19>] __task_rq_lock+0x8b/0xd3
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81032f7f>] wake_up_new_task+0x41/0x108
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810376c3>] do_fork+0x265/0x33f
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81007d02>] kernel_thread+0x6b/0x6d
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8153a9dd>] rest_init+0x21/0xd2
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81b1db4f>] start_kernel+0x3bb/0x3c6
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81b1d29f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81b1d393>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf0/0xf7
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81067788>] check_prev_add+0x68/0x20e
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff815698ea>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x57
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81032d8f>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81032f3c>] wake_up_process+0x10/0x12
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810901e9>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x44/0x58
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81045286>] call_timer_fn+0xac/0x1e9
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8104556d>] run_timer_softirq+0x1aa/0x1f2
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8103e487>] __do_softirq+0x109/0x26a
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8157144c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81003207>] do_softirq+0x44/0xf1
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8103e8b9>] irq_exit+0x58/0xc8
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81017f5a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x87
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff81570fd3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810bd51a>] get_page_from_freelist+0x2aa/0x310
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810bdf03>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x178/0x243
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8101fe2f>] pte_alloc_one+0x1e/0x3a
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810d27fe>] __pte_alloc+0x22/0x14b
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff810d48a8>] handle_mm_fault+0x17e/0x1e0
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8156cfee>] do_page_fault+0x42d/0x5de
[   13.173009]        [<ffffffff8156a75f>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] other info that might help us debug this:
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] Chain exists of:
[   13.173009]   &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> rcu_node_level_0
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   13.173009]        ----                    ----
[   13.173009]   lock(rcu_node_level_0);
[   13.173009]                                lock(&rq->lock);
[   13.173009]                                lock(rcu_node_level_0);
[   13.173009]   lock(&p->pi_lock);
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] 3 locks held by blkid/267:
[   13.173009]  #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8156cdb4>] do_page_fault+0x1f3/0x5de
[   13.173009]  #1:  (&yield_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810451da>] call_timer_fn+0x0/0x1e9
[   13.173009]  #2:  (rcu_node_level_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810901cc>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x27/0x58
[   13.173009]
[   13.173009] stack backtrace:
[   13.173009] Pid: 267, comm: blkid Not tainted 2.6.39-rc6-mmotm0506 #1
[   13.173009] Call Trace:
[   13.173009]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8154a529>] print_circular_bug+0xc8/0xd9
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81067788>] check_prev_add+0x68/0x20e
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8100c861>] ? save_stack_trace+0x28/0x46
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810679b9>] check_prevs_add+0x8b/0x104
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81067da1>] validate_chain+0x36f/0x3ab
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8106846b>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0x3e2
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81032d8f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81068a0f>] lock_acquire+0xfc/0x14c
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81032d8f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff815698ea>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x57
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81032d8f>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81032d8f>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81032f3c>] wake_up_process+0x10/0x12
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810901e9>] rcu_cpu_kthread_timer+0x44/0x58
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81045286>] call_timer_fn+0xac/0x1e9
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810451da>] ? del_timer+0x75/0x75
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810901a5>] ? rcu_check_quiescent_state+0x82/0x82
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8104556d>] run_timer_softirq+0x1aa/0x1f2
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8103e487>] __do_softirq+0x109/0x26a
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8106365f>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x37/0xf6
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810a0e4a>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x1b/0x2f
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8157144c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81003207>] do_softirq+0x44/0xf1
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8103e8b9>] irq_exit+0x58/0xc8
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81017f5a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x87
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81570fd3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[   13.173009]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff810bd384>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x114/0x310
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810bd51a>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x2aa/0x310
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff812220e7>] ? clear_page_c+0x7/0x10
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810bd1ef>] ? prep_new_page+0x14c/0x1cd
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810bd51a>] get_page_from_freelist+0x2aa/0x310
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810bdf03>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x178/0x243
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810d46b9>] ? __pmd_alloc+0x87/0x99
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8101fe2f>] pte_alloc_one+0x1e/0x3a
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810d46b9>] ? __pmd_alloc+0x87/0x99
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810d27fe>] __pte_alloc+0x22/0x14b
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810d48a8>] handle_mm_fault+0x17e/0x1e0
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8156cfee>] do_page_fault+0x42d/0x5de
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810d915f>] ? sys_brk+0x32/0x10c
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff810a0e4a>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x1b/0x2f
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff81065c4f>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0x9c
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff812235dd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
[   13.173009]  [<ffffffff8156a75f>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
[   14.010075] usb 5-1: new full speed USB device number 2 using uhci_hcd

Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Merge branch 'rcu/urgent' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu into core/urgent 2011-05-28T15:41:05+00:00 Ingo Molnar mingo@elte.hu 2011-05-27T10:38:52+00:00 29f742f88a32c9ab8cf6d9ba69e1ea918be5aa58