For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback
missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years.
Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running()
triggers with a posix CPU timer test case.

Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on
CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK:

1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so
   spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound.

   Implement an empty stub function for that case.

2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user
   space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved
   from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once
   the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in
   fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled
   out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than
   suboptimal.

   The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses
   a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the
   task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock.

   This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no
   timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task
   belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock
   can be used too in a slightly different way:

    - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task
      and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt.

    - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store
      a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task
      moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not
      affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union
      members already

    - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function

    - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and
      block on the expiry mutex

   This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and
   works nicely for RT too.

Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT")
Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx

Use atomic64_try_cmpxchg() instead of atomic64_cmpxchg() in
__update_gt_cputime(). The x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF
flag, so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg() (and related move
instruction in front of cmpxchg()).

Also, atomic64_try_cmpxchg() implicitly assigns old *ptr value to "old"
when cmpxchg() fails.  There is no need to re-read the value in the loop.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116165337.5810-1-ubizjak@gmail.com

The function __group_send_sig_info is just a light wrapper around
send_signal_locked with one parameter fixed to a constant value.  As
the wrapper adds no real value update the code to directly call the
wrapped function.

Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-2-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Pull ptrace cleanups from Eric Biederman:
 "This set of changes removes tracehook.h, moves modification of all of
  the ptrace fields inside of siglock to remove races, adds a missing
  permission check to ptrace.c

  The removal of tracehook.h is quite significant as it has been a major
  source of confusion in recent years. Much of that confusion was around
  task_work and TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL (which I have now decoupled making the
  semantics clearer).

  For people who don't know tracehook.h is a vestiage of an attempt to
  implement uprobes like functionality that was never fully merged, and
  was later superseeded by uprobes when uprobes was merged. For many
  years now we have been removing what tracehook functionaly a little
  bit at a time. To the point where anything left in tracehook.h was
  some weird strange thing that was difficult to understand"

* tag 'ptrace-cleanups-for-v5.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace:
  ptrace: Remove duplicated include in ptrace.c
  ptrace: Check PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP permission on PTRACE_SEIZE
  ptrace: Return the signal to continue with from ptrace_stop
  ptrace: Move setting/clearing ptrace_message into ptrace_stop
  tracehook: Remove tracehook.h
  resume_user_mode: Move to resume_user_mode.h
  resume_user_mode: Remove #ifdef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in set_notify_resume
  signal: Move set_notify_signal and clear_notify_signal into sched/signal.h
  task_work: Decouple TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL and task_work
  task_work: Call tracehook_notify_signal from get_signal on all architectures
  task_work: Introduce task_work_pending
  task_work: Remove unnecessary include from posix_timers.h
  ptrace: Remove tracehook_signal_handler
  ptrace: Remove arch_syscall_{enter,exit}_tracehook
  ptrace: Create ptrace_report_syscall_{entry,exit} in ptrace.h
  ptrace/arm: Rename tracehook_report_syscall report_syscall
  ptrace: Move ptrace_report_syscall into ptrace.h

Break a header file circular dependency by removing the unnecessary
include of task_work.h from posix_timers.h.

sched.h -> posix-timers.h
posix-timers.h -> task_work.h
task_work.h -> sched.h

Add missing includes of task_work.h to:
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309162454.123006-6-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Unnecessarily grabbing the tasklist_lock can be a scalability bottleneck
for workloads that also must grab the tasklist_lock for waiting,
killing, and cloning.

The tasklist_lock was grabbed to protect tsk->sighand from disappearing
(becoming NULL).  tsk->signal was already protected by holding a
reference to tsk.

update_rlimit_cpu() assumed tsk->sighand != NULL.  With this commit, it
attempts to lock_task_sighand().  However, this means that
update_rlimit_cpu() can fail.  This only happens when a task is exiting.
Note that during exec, sighand may *change*, but it will not be NULL.

Prior to this commit, the do_prlimit() ensured that update_rlimit_cpu()
would not fail by read locking the tasklist_lock and checking tsk->sighand
!= NULL.

If update_rlimit_cpu() fails, there may be other tasks that are not
exiting that share tsk->signal.  However, the group_leader is the last
task to be released, so if we cannot update_rlimit_cpu(group_leader),
then the entire process is exiting.

The only other caller of update_rlimit_cpu() is
selinux_bprm_committing_creds().  It has tsk == current, so
update_rlimit_cpu() cannot fail (current->sighand cannot disappear
until current exits).

This change resulted in a 14% speedup on a microbenchmark where parents
kill and wait on their children, and children getpriority, setpriority,
and getrlimit.

Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220106172041.522167-4-brho@google.com
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

copy_process currently copies task_struct.posix_cputimers_work as-is. If a
timer interrupt arrives while handling clone and before dup_task_struct
completes then the child task will have:

1. posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true
2. posix_cputimers_work.work queued.

copy_process clears task_struct.task_works, so (2) will have no effect and
posix_cpu_timers_work will never run (not to mention it doesn't make sense
for two tasks to share a common linked list).

Since posix_cpu_timers_work never runs, posix_cputimers_work.scheduled is
never cleared. Since scheduled is set, future timer interrupts will skip
scheduling work, with the ultimate result that the task will never receive
timer expirations.

Together, the complete flow is:

1. Task 1 calls clone(), enters kernel.
2. Timer interrupt fires, schedules task work on Task 1.
   2a. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true
   2b. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.work added to
       task_struct.task_works.
3. dup_task_struct() copies Task 1 to Task 2.
4. copy_process() clears task_struct.task_works for Task 2.
5. Future timer interrupts on Task 2 see
   task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true and skip scheduling
   work.

Fix this by explicitly clearing contents of task_struct.posix_cputimers_work
in copy_process(). This was never meant to be shared or inherited across
tasks in the first place.

Fixes: 1fb497dd0030 ("posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work")
Reported-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
Signed-off-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211101210615.716522-1-mpratt@google.com

Resetting/stopping an itimer eventually leads to it being reprogrammed
with an actual "0" value. As a result the itimer expires on the next
tick, triggering an unexpected signal.

To fix this, make sure that
struct signal_struct::it[CPUCLOCK_PROF/VIRT]::expires is set to 0 when
setitimer() passes a 0 it_value, indicating that the timer must stop.

Fixes: 406dd42bd1ba ("posix-cpu-timers: Force next expiration recalc after itimer reset")
Reported-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Chris Hixon <linux-kernel-bugs@hixontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913145332.232023-1-frederic@kernel.org

There are several scenarios that can result in posix_cpu_timer_set()
not queueing the timer but still leaving the threadgroup cputime counter
running or keeping the tick dependency around for a random amount of time.

1) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is
   already disabled, the process wide cputime counter will be started
   and won't ever get a chance to be stopped by stop_process_timer()
   since no timer is actually armed to be processed.

   The following snippet is enough to trigger the issue.

	void trigger_process_counter(void)
	{
		timer_t id;
		struct itimerspec val = { };

		timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id);
		timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL);
		timer_delete(id);
	}

2) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is
   already armed, the timer is dequeued but not really disarmed. So the
   process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still remain
   a while around.

   The following code snippet keeps this overhead around for one week after
   the timer deletion:

	void trigger_process_counter(void)
	{
		timer_t id;
		struct itimerspec val = { };

		val.it_value.tv_sec = 604800;
		timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id);
		timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL);
		timer_delete(id);
	}

3) If the timer was initially deactivated, this call to timer_settime()
   with an early expiration may have started the process wide cputime
   counter even though the timer hasn't been queued and armed because it
   has fired early and inline within posix_cpu_timer_set() itself. As a
   result the process wide cputime counter may never stop until a new
   timer is ever armed in the future.

   The following code snippet can reproduce this:

	void trigger_process_counter(void)
	{
		timer_t id;
		struct itimerspec val = { };

		signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN);
		timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id);
		val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1;
		timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL);
	}

4) If the timer was initially armed with a former expiration value
   before this call to timer_settime() and the current call sets an
   early deadline that has already expired, the timer fires inline
   within posix_cpu_timer_set(). In this case it must have been dequeued
   before firing inline with its new expiration value, yet it hasn't
   been disarmed in this case. So the process wide cputime counter and
   the tick dependency may still be around for a while even after the
   timer fired.

   The following code snippet can reproduce this:

	void trigger_process_counter(void)
	{
		timer_t id;
		struct itimerspec val = { };

		signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN);
		timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id);
		val.it_value.tv_sec = 100;
		timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL);
		val.it_value.tv_sec = 0;
		val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1;
		timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL);
	}

Fix all these issues with triggering the related base next expiration
recalculation on the next tick. This also implies to re-evaluate the need
to keep around the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency, in
a similar fashion to disarm_timer().

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-7-frederic@kernel.org

Remove the ad-hoc timer base accessors and provide a consolidated one.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-6-frederic@kernel.org