linux-toradex.git/kernel, branch v4.9.97

perf: Return proper values for user stack errors

2018-04-29T09:31:57+00:00

commit 78b562fbfa2cf0a9fcb23c3154756b690f4905c1 upstream.

Return immediately when we find issue in the user stack checks. The
error value could get overwritten by following check for
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: H. Peter Anvin 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Fixes: 60e2364e60e8 ("perf: Add ability to sample machine state on interrupt")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180415092352.12403-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix sample_max_stack maximum check

2018-04-29T09:31:57+00:00

commit 5af44ca53d019de47efe6dbc4003dd518e5197ed upstream.

The syzbot hit KASAN bug in perf_callchain_store having the entry stored
behind the allocated bounds [1].

We miss the sample_max_stack check for the initial event that allocates
callchain buffers. This missing check allows to create an event with
sample_max_stack value bigger than the global sysctl maximum:

  # sysctl -a | grep perf_event_max_stack
  kernel.perf_event_max_stack = 127

  # perf record -vv -C 1 -e cycles/max-stack=256/ kill
  ...
  perf_event_attr:
    size                             112
    ...
    sample_max_stack                 256
  ------------------------------------------------------------
  sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 4

Note the '-C 1', which forces perf record to create just single event.
Otherwise it opens event for every cpu, then the sample_max_stack check
fails on the second event and all's fine.

The fix is to run the sample_max_stack check also for the first event
with callchains.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152352732920874&w=2

Reported-by: syzbot+7c449856228b63ac951e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: H. Peter Anvin 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Fixes: 97c79a38cd45 ("perf core: Per event callchain limit")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180415092352.12403-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

resource: fix integer overflow at reallocation

2018-04-24T07:34:09+00:00

commit 60bb83b81169820c691fbfa33a6a4aef32aa4b0b upstream.

We've got a bug report indicating a kernel panic at booting on an x86-32
system, and it turned out to be the invalid PCI resource assigned after
reallocation.  __find_resource() first aligns the resource start address
and resets the end address with start+size-1 accordingly, then checks
whether it's contained.  Here the end address may overflow the integer,
although resource_contains() still returns true because the function
validates only start and end address.  So this ends up with returning an
invalid resource (start > end).

There was already an attempt to cover such a problem in the commit
47ea91b4052d ("Resource: fix wrong resource window calculation"), but
this case is an overseen one.

This patch adds the validity check of the newly calculated resource for
avoiding the integer overflow problem.

Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1086739
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/s5hpo37d5l8.wl-tiwai@suse.de
Fixes: 23c570a67448 ("resource: ability to resize an allocated resource")
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai 
Reported-by: Michael Henders 
Tested-by: Michael Henders 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Ram Pai 
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix use-after-free in uprobe_perf_close()

2018-04-20T06:20:42+00:00

commit 621b6d2ea297d0fb6030452c5bcd221f12165fcf upstream.

A use-after-free bug was caught by KASAN while running usdt related
code (BCC project. bcc/tests/python/test_usdt2.py):

	==================================================================
	BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0
	Read of size 4 at addr ffff880384f9b4a4 by task test_usdt2.py/870

	CPU: 4 PID: 870 Comm: test_usdt2.py Tainted: G        W         4.16.0-next-20180409 #215
	Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
	Call Trace:
	 dump_stack+0xc7/0x15b
	 ? show_regs_print_info+0x5/0x5
	 ? printk+0x9c/0xc3
	 ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0x6e/0x6e
	 ? uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0
	 print_address_description+0x83/0x3a0
	 ? uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0
	 kasan_report+0x1dd/0x460
	 ? uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0
	 uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0
	 ? probes_open+0x180/0x180
	 ? free_filters_list+0x290/0x290
	 trace_uprobe_register+0x1bb/0x500
	 ? perf_event_attach_bpf_prog+0x310/0x310
	 ? probe_event_disable+0x4e0/0x4e0
	 perf_uprobe_destroy+0x63/0xd0
	 _free_event+0x2bc/0xbd0
	 ? lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x100/0x100
	 ? ring_buffer_attach+0x550/0x550
	 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x1a/0x30
	 ? perf_event_release_kernel+0x3e4/0xc00
	 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x12e/0x540
	 ? wait_for_completion+0x430/0x430
	 ? lock_downgrade+0x3c0/0x3c0
	 ? lock_release+0x980/0x980
	 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x118/0x150
	 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x121/0x210
	 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x150/0x150
	 perf_event_release_kernel+0x5d4/0xc00
	 ? put_event+0x30/0x30
	 ? fsnotify+0xd2d/0xea0
	 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1a0
	 ? __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags.part.0+0x1b0/0x1b0
	 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x152/0x2b0
	 ? pvclock_read_flags+0x80/0x80
	 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x1a/0x30
	 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1a0
	 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x152/0x2b0
	 ? locks_remove_file+0xec/0x470
	 ? pvclock_read_flags+0x80/0x80
	 ? fcntl_setlk+0x880/0x880
	 ? ima_file_free+0x8d/0x390
	 ? lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x100/0x100
	 ? ima_file_check+0x110/0x110
	 ? fsnotify+0xea0/0xea0
	 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x1a/0x30
	 ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x600/0x600
	 perf_release+0x21/0x40
	 __fput+0x264/0x620
	 ? fput+0xf0/0xf0
	 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x121/0x210
	 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x150/0x150
	 ? SyS_fchdir+0x100/0x100
	 ? fsnotify+0xea0/0xea0
	 task_work_run+0x14b/0x1e0
	 ? task_work_cancel+0x1c0/0x1c0
	 ? copy_fd_bitmaps+0x150/0x150
	 ? vfs_read+0xe5/0x260
	 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x17b/0x1b0
	 ? trace_event_raw_event_sys_exit+0x1a0/0x1a0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3f6/0x490
	 ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x2c0/0x2c0
	 ? lockdep_sys_exit+0x1f/0xaa
	 ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x1a3/0x2c0
	 ? lockdep_sys_exit+0x1f/0xaa
	 ? prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x11c/0x1e0
	 ? enter_from_user_mode+0x30/0x30
	random: crng init done
	 ? __put_user_4+0x1c/0x30
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
	RIP: 0033:0x7f41d95f9340
	RSP: 002b:00007fffe71e4268 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003
	RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f41d95f9340
	RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000002401 RDI: 000000000000000d
	RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f41ca8ff700 R09: 00007f41d996dd1f
	R10: 00007fffe71e41e0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fffe71e4330
	R13: 0000000000000000 R14: fffffffffffffffc R15: 00007fffe71e4290

	Allocated by task 870:
	 kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0
	 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x11a/0x430
	 copy_process.part.19+0x11a0/0x41c0
	 _do_fork+0x1be/0xa20
	 do_syscall_64+0x198/0x490
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2

	Freed by task 0:
	 __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180
	 kmem_cache_free+0x102/0x4d0
	 free_task+0xfe/0x160
	 __put_task_struct+0x189/0x290
	 delayed_put_task_struct+0x119/0x250
	 rcu_process_callbacks+0xa6c/0x1b60
	 __do_softirq+0x238/0x7ae

	The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff880384f9b480
	 which belongs to the cache task_struct of size 12928

It occurs because task_struct is freed before perf_event which refers
to the task and task flags are checked while teardown of the event.
perf_event_alloc() assigns task_struct to hw.target of perf_event,
but there is no reference counting for it.

As a fix we get_task_struct() in perf_event_alloc() at above mentioned
assignment and put_task_struct() in _free_event().

Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole 
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Fixes: 63b6da39bb38e8f1a1ef3180d32a39d6 ("perf: Fix perf_event_exit_task() race")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180409100346.6416-1-bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Use the revised wakeup rule for suspending constrained dl tasks

2018-04-13T17:48:23+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3effcb4247e74a51f5d8b775a1ee4abf87cc089a ]

We have been facing some problems with self-suspending constrained
deadline tasks. The main reason is that the original CBS was not
designed for such sort of tasks.

One problem reported by Xunlei Pang takes place when a task
suspends, and then is awakened before the deadline, but so close
to the deadline that its remaining runtime can cause the task
to have an absolute density higher than allowed. In such situation,
the original CBS assumes that the task is facing an early activation,
and so it replenishes the task and set another deadline, one deadline
in the future. This rule works fine for implicit deadline tasks.
Moreover, it allows the system to adapt the period of a task in which
the external event source suffered from a clock drift.

However, this opens the window for bandwidth leakage for constrained
deadline tasks. For instance, a task with the following parameters:

  runtime   = 5 ms
  deadline  = 7 ms
  [density] = 5 / 7 = 0.71
  period    = 1000 ms

If the task runs for 1 ms, and then suspends for another 1ms,
it will be awakened with the following parameters:

  remaining runtime = 4
  laxity = 5

presenting a absolute density of 4 / 5 = 0.80.

In this case, the original CBS would assume the task had an early
wakeup. Then, CBS will reset the runtime, and the absolute deadline will
be postponed by one relative deadline, allowing the task to run.

The problem is that, if the task runs this pattern forever, it will keep
receiving bandwidth, being able to run 1ms every 2ms. Following this
behavior, the task would be able to run 500 ms in 1 sec. Thus running
more than the 5 ms / 1 sec the admission control allowed it to run.

Trying to address the self-suspending case, Luca Abeni, Giuseppe
Lipari, and Juri Lelli [1] revisited the CBS in order to deal with
self-suspending tasks. In the new approach, rather than
replenishing/postponing the absolute deadline, the revised wakeup rule
adjusts the remaining runtime, reducing it to fit into the allowed
density.

A revised version of the idea is:

At a given time t, the maximum absolute density of a task cannot be
higher than its relative density, that is:

  runtime / (deadline - t) <= dl_runtime / dl_deadline

Knowing the laxity of a task (deadline - t), it is possible to move
it to the other side of the equality, thus enabling to define max
remaining runtime a task can use within the absolute deadline, without
over-running the allowed density:

  runtime = (dl_runtime / dl_deadline) * (deadline - t)

For instance, in our previous example, the task could still run:

  runtime = ( 5 / 7 ) * 5
  runtime = 3.57 ms

Without causing damage for other deadline tasks. It is note worthy
that the laxity cannot be negative because that would cause a negative
runtime. Thus, this patch depends on the patch:

  df8eac8cafce ("sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline")

Which throttles a constrained deadline task activated after the
deadline.

Finally, it is also possible to use the revised wakeup rule for
all other tasks, but that would require some more discussions
about pros and cons.

Reported-by: Xunlei Pang 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 
[peterz: replaced dl_is_constrained with dl_is_implicit]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Juri Lelli 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Luca Abeni 
Cc: Mike Galbraith 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Romulo Silva de Oliveira 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5c800ab3a74a168a84ee5f3f84d12a02e11383be.1495803804.git.bristot@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Correct event creation with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP

2018-04-13T17:48:23+00:00

[ Upstream commit ba5213ae6b88fb170c4771fef6553f759c7d8cdd ]

Andi was asking about PERF_FORMAT_GROUP vs inherited events, which led
to the discovery of a bug from commit:

  3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff")

 -       PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP                       = 1U << 4,
 +       PERF_SAMPLE_READ                        = 1U << 4,

 -       if (attr->inherit && (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP))
 +       if (attr->inherit && (attr->read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP))

is a clear fail :/

While this changes user visible behaviour; it was previously possible
to create an inherited event with PERF_SAMPLE_READ; this is deemed
acceptible because its results were always incorrect.

Reported-by: Andi Kleen 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Fixes:  3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170530094512.dy2nljns2uq7qa3j@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpuhotplug: Link lock stacks for hotplug callbacks

2018-04-13T17:48:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 49dfe2a6779717d9c18395684ee31bdc98b22e53 ]

The CPU hotplug callbacks are not covered by lockdep versus the cpu hotplug
rwsem.

CPU0						CPU1
cpuhp_setup_state(STATE, startup, teardown);
 cpus_read_lock();
  invoke_callback_on_ap();
    kick_hotplug_thread(ap);
    wait_for_completion();			hotplug_thread_fn()
    						  lock(m);
						  do_stuff();
						  unlock(m);

Lockdep does not know about this dependency and will not trigger on the
following code sequence:

	  lock(m);
	  cpus_read_lock();

Add a lockdep map and connect the initiators lock chain with the hotplug
thread lock chain, so potential deadlocks can be detected.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Sebastian Siewior 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081549.709375845@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/numa: Use down_read_trylock() for the mmap_sem

2018-04-13T17:48:04+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8655d5497735b288f8a9b458bd22e7d1bf95bb61 ]

A customer has reported a soft-lockup when running an intensive
memory stress test, where the trace on multiple CPU's looks like this:

 RIP: 0010:[]
  [] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x10e/0x190
...
 Call Trace:
  [] queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x7/0xa
  [] change_protection_range+0x3b1/0x930
  [] change_prot_numa+0x18/0x30
  [] task_numa_work+0x1fe/0x310
  [] task_work_run+0x72/0x90

Further investigation showed that the lock contention here is pmd_lock().

The task_numa_work() function makes sure that only one thread is let to perform
the work in a single scan period (via cmpxchg), but if there's a thread with
mmap_sem locked for writing for several periods, multiple threads in
task_numa_work() can build up a convoy waiting for mmap_sem for read and then
all get unblocked at once.

This patch changes the down_read() to the trylock version, which prevents the
build up. For a workload experiencing mmap_sem contention, it's probably better
to postpone the NUMA balancing work anyway. This seems to have fixed the soft
lockups involving pmd_lock(), which is in line with the convoy theory.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Acked-by: Rik van Riel 
Acked-by: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170515131316.21909-1-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix error handling in perf_event_alloc()

2018-04-13T17:48:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit 36cc2b9222b5106de34085c4dd8635ac67ef5cba ]

We don't set an error code here which means that perf_event_alloc()
returns ERR_PTR(0) (in other words NULL).  The callers are not expecting
that and would Oops.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Vince Weaver 
Fixes: 375637bc5249 ("perf/core: Introduce address range filtering")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170522090418.hvs6icgpdo53wkn5@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/callchain: Force USER_DS when invoking perf_callchain_user()

2018-04-13T17:47:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit 88b0193d9418c00340e45e0a913a0813bc6c8c96 ]

Perf can generate and record a user callchain in response to a synchronous
request, such as a tracepoint firing. If this happens under set_fs(KERNEL_DS),
then we can end up walking the user stack (and dereferencing/saving whatever we
find there) without the protections usually afforded by checks such as
access_ok.

Rather than play whack-a-mole with each architecture's stack unwinding
implementation, fix the root of the problem by ensuring that we force USER_DS
when invoking perf_callchain_user from the perf core.

Reported-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Cc: Jiri Olsa 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman