Earlier in this function we set the last byte of "buf" to NULL so we
always hit the break statement and "i" is never equal to NAME_MAX_LEN.
This patch doesn't change how the driver works but it silences a Smatch
warning and it makes it clearer that we don't write past the end of the
array.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>

warning: symbol 'filter_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>

There is no need to perform full BIDIR sync (copying the buffers in case
of swiotlb and similar schemes) if we know that the owner (CPU or device)
hasn't altered the data.

Addresses the false-positive reported at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14169

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Stephen Rothwell reported the following build warning:

 lib/dma-debug.c: In function 'dma_debug_device_change':
 lib/dma-debug.c:680: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void

Introduced by commit f797d9881b62c2ddb1d2e7bd80d87141949c84aa
("dma-debug: Do not add notifier when dma debugging is disabled").

Return 0 [notify-done] when disabled. (this is standard bus notifier behavior.)

Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091231125624.GA14666@liondog.tnic>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

If CONFIG_HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG is defined and "dma_debug=off" is
specified on the kernel command line, when you detach a driver from a
device you can cause the following NULL pointer dereference:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<c0580d35>] dma_debug_device_change+0x5d/0x117

The problem is that the dma_debug_device_change notifier function is
added to the bus notifier chain even though the dma_entry_hash array
was never initialized.  If dma debugging is disabled, this patch both
prevents dma_debug_device_change notifiers from being added to the
chain, and additionally ensures that the dma_debug_device_change
notifier function is a no-op.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>

That is "success", "unknown", "through", "performance", "[re|un]mapping"
, "access", "default", "reasonable", "[con]currently", "temperature"
, "channel", "[un]used", "application", "example","hierarchy", "therefore"
, "[over|under]flow", "contiguous", "threshold", "enough" and others.

Signed-off-by: André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

When PAE is enabled in the kernel configuration the size of
phys_addr_t differs from the size of a void pointer. The gcc
prints a warning about that in dma-debug code.
This patch fixes the warning by converting the output to
unsigned long long instead of a pointer.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>

While it's debatable whether or not a NULL device argument to
the DMA API functions is valid... since it certainly isn't
valid on devices with an IOMMU... dma-debug really shouldn't be
dereferencing null pointers either.

Guard against that in err_printk and the driver_filter
functions. A Fedora rawhide user was seeing this in one of the
dvb drivers resulting in an oops on boot.

[ A patch has been sent for testing to the driver, but I feel
  the dma debugging support should be fixed as well. (There's
  still a pile of legacy garbage in the kernel passing null
  pointers to dma_{alloc,free}_*. :( ]

Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Cc: mchehab@infradead.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090820011708.GP25206@bombadil.infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Linus noticed how unclean and buggy the overlap() function is:

 - It uses convoluted (and bug-causing) positive checks for
   range overlap - instead of using a more natural negative
   check.

 - Even the positive checks are buggy: a positive intersection
   check has four natural cases while we checked only for three,
   missing the (addr < start && addr2 == end) case for example.

 - The variables are mis-named, making it non-obvious how the
   check was done.

 - It needlessly uses u64 instead of unsigned long. Since these
   are kernel memory pointers and we explicitly exclude highmem
   ranges anyway we cannot ever overflow 32 bits, even if we
   could. (and on 64-bit it doesnt matter anyway)

All in one, this function needs a total revamp. I used Linus's
suggestions minus the paranoid checks (we cannot overflow really
because if we get totally bad DMA ranges passed far more things
break in the systems than just DMA debugging). I also fixed a
few other small details i noticed.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>