linux-toradex.git/lib/kunit, branch v6.6-rc1 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules kunit: fix struct kunit_attr header 2023-08-21T14:07:56+00:00 Rae Moar rmoar@google.com 2023-08-17T19:14:51+00:00 25e324bc9cf2ee956eec1db384c39c1a17b7c44a Add parameter descriptions to struct kunit_attr header for the parameters attr_default and print. Fixes: 39e92cb1e4a1 ("kunit: Add test attributes API structure") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308180127.VD7YRPGa-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Add parameter descriptions to struct kunit_attr header for the
parameters attr_default and print.

Fixes: 39e92cb1e4a1 ("kunit: Add test attributes API structure")

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308180127.VD7YRPGa-lkp@intel.com/

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering 2023-08-08T19:46:18+00:00 Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com 2023-08-07T10:23:56+00:00 b67abaad4d25b5d9364a1d4f6bc18286ebaaa013 External tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), support execution of individual selftests provided by kernel modules. That could be also applicable to kunit test modules if they provided test filtering. But test filtering is now possible only when kunit code is built into the kernel. Moreover, a filter can be specified only at boot time, then reboot is required each time a different filter is needed. Build the test filtering code also when kunit is configured as a module, expose test filtering functions to other kunit source files, and use them in kunit module notifier callback functions. Userspace can then reload the kunit module with a value of the filter_glob parameter tuned to a specific kunit test module every time it wants to limit the scope of tests executed on that module load. Make the kunit.filter* parameters visible in sysfs for user convenience. v5: Refresh on tpp of attributes filtering fix v4: Refresh on top of newly applied attributes patches and changes introdced by new versions of other patches submitted in series with this one. v3: Fix CONFIG_GLOB, required by filtering functions, not selected when building as a module (lkp@intel.com). v2: Fix new name of a structure moved to kunit namespace not updated across all uses (lkp@intel.com). Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
External tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), support execution of
individual selftests provided by kernel modules.  That could be also
applicable to kunit test modules if they provided test filtering.  But
test filtering is now possible only when kunit code is built into the
kernel.  Moreover, a filter can be specified only at boot time, then
reboot is required each time a different filter is needed.

Build the test filtering code also when kunit is configured as a module,
expose test filtering functions to other kunit source files, and use them
in kunit module notifier callback functions.  Userspace can then reload
the kunit module with a value of the filter_glob parameter tuned to a
specific kunit test module every time it wants to limit the scope of tests
executed on that module load.  Make the kunit.filter* parameters visible
in sysfs for user convenience.

v5: Refresh on tpp of attributes filtering fix
v4: Refresh on top of newly applied attributes patches and changes
    introdced by new versions of other patches submitted in series with
    this one.
v3: Fix CONFIG_GLOB, required by filtering functions, not selected when
    building as a module (lkp@intel.com).
v2: Fix new name of a structure moved to kunit namespace not updated
    across all uses (lkp@intel.com).

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: Make 'list' action available to kunit test modules 2023-08-08T19:46:13+00:00 Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com 2023-08-07T10:23:55+00:00 18258c60f8a74b9c39b593d118f13f3265d44cd6 Results from kunit tests reported via dmesg may be interleaved with other kernel messages. When parsing dmesg for modular kunit results in real time, external tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), may want to insert their own test name markers into dmesg at the start of each test, before any kernel message related to that test appears there, so existing upper level test result parsers have no doubt which test to blame for a specific kernel message. Unfortunately, kunit reports names of tests only at their completion (with the exeption of a not standarized "# Subtest: <name>" header above a test plan of each test suite or parametrized test). External tools could be able to insert their own "start of the test" markers with test names included if they new those names in advance. Test names could be learned from a list if provided by a kunit test module. There exists a feature of listing kunit tests without actually executing them, but it is now limited to configurations with the kunit module built in and covers only built-in tests, already available at boot time. Moreover, switching from list to normal mode requires reboot. If that feature was also available when kunit is built as a module, userspace could load the module with action=list parameter, load some kunit test modules they are interested in and learn about the list of tests provided by those modules, then unload them, reload the kunit module in normal mode and execute the tests with their lists already known. Extend kunit module notifier initialization callback with a processing path for only listing the tests provided by a module if the kunit action parameter is set to "list" or "list_attr". For user convenience, make the kunit.action parameter visible in sysfs. v2: Don't use a different format, use kunit_exec_list_tests() (Rae), - refresh on top of new attributes patches, handle newly introduced kunit.action=list_attr case (Rae). Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Results from kunit tests reported via dmesg may be interleaved with other
kernel messages.  When parsing dmesg for modular kunit results in real
time, external tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), may want to insert
their own test name markers into dmesg at the start of each test, before
any kernel message related to that test appears there, so existing upper
level test result parsers have no doubt which test to blame for a specific
kernel message.  Unfortunately, kunit reports names of tests only at their
completion (with the exeption of a not standarized "# Subtest: <name>"
header above a test plan of each test suite or parametrized test).

External tools could be able to insert their own "start of the test"
markers with test names included if they new those names in advance.
Test names could be learned from a list if provided by a kunit test
module.

There exists a feature of listing kunit tests without actually executing
them, but it is now limited to configurations with the kunit module built
in and covers only built-in tests, already available at boot time.
Moreover, switching from list to normal mode requires reboot.  If that
feature was also available when kunit is built as a module, userspace
could load the module with action=list parameter, load some kunit test
modules they are interested in and learn about the list of tests provided
by those modules, then unload them, reload the kunit module in normal mode
and execute the tests with their lists already known.

Extend kunit module notifier initialization callback with a processing
path for only listing the tests provided by a module if the kunit action
parameter is set to "list" or "list_attr".  For user convenience, make the
kunit.action parameter visible in sysfs.

v2: Don't use a different format, use kunit_exec_list_tests() (Rae),
  - refresh on top of new attributes patches, handle newly introduced
    kunit.action=list_attr case (Rae).

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: Report the count of test suites in a module 2023-08-08T19:46:05+00:00 Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com 2023-08-07T10:23:54+00:00 c95e7c05c139b1a8a51d368bde57cf20ce931a98 According to KTAP specification[1], results should always start from a header that provides a TAP protocol version, followed by a test plan with a count of items to be executed. That pattern should be followed at each nesting level. In the current implementation of the top-most, i.e., test suite level, those rules apply only for test suites built into the kernel, executed and reported on boot. Results submitted to dmesg from kunit test modules loaded later are missing those top-level headers. As a consequence, if a kunit test module provides more than one test suite then, without the top level test plan, external tools that are parsing dmesg for kunit test output are not able to tell how many test suites should be expected and whether to continue parsing after complete output from the first test suite is collected. Submit the top-level headers also from the kunit test module notifier initialization callback. v3: Fix new name of a structure moved to kunit namespace not updated in executor_test functions (lkp@intel.com). v2: Use kunit_exec_run_tests() (Mauro, Rae), but prevent it from emitting the headers when called on load of non-test modules. [1] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/ktap.html# Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
According to KTAP specification[1], results should always start from a
header that provides a TAP protocol version, followed by a test plan with
a count of items to be executed.  That pattern should be followed at each
nesting level.  In the current implementation of the top-most, i.e., test
suite level, those rules apply only for test suites built into the kernel,
executed and reported on boot.  Results submitted to dmesg from kunit test
modules loaded later are missing those top-level headers.

As a consequence, if a kunit test module provides more than one test suite
then, without the top level test plan, external tools that are parsing
dmesg for kunit test output are not able to tell how many test suites
should be expected and whether to continue parsing after complete output
from the first test suite is collected.

Submit the top-level headers also from the kunit test module notifier
initialization callback.

v3: Fix new name of a structure moved to kunit namespace not updated in
    executor_test functions (lkp@intel.com).
v2: Use kunit_exec_run_tests() (Mauro, Rae), but prevent it from
    emitting the headers when called on load of non-test modules.

[1] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/ktap.html#

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: fix uninitialized variables bug in attributes filtering 2023-08-04T19:41:55+00:00 Rae Moar rmoar@google.com 2023-08-03T19:36:35+00:00 1c9fd080dffe5e5ad763527fbc2aa3f6f8c653e9 Fix smatch warnings regarding uninitialized variables in the filtering patch of the new KUnit Attributes feature. Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307270610.s0w4NKEn-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Fix smatch warnings regarding uninitialized variables in the filtering
patch of the new KUnit Attributes feature.

Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307270610.s0w4NKEn-lkp@intel.com/

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites() 2023-08-04T19:41:47+00:00 Ruan Jinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com 2023-08-01T07:37:00+00:00 abbf73816b6f5f4268fbfb3b3505003c2356d4a9 Inject fault while probing drm_kunit_helpers.ko, if one of kunit_next_attr_filter(), kunit_filter_glob_tests() and kunit_filter_attr_tests() fails, parsed_filters, parsed_glob.suite_glob/test_glob alloced in kunit_parse_glob_filter() is leaked. And the filtered_suite->test_cases alloced in kunit_filter_glob_tests() or kunit_filter_attr_tests() may also be leaked. unreferenced object 0xff110001067e4800 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140 [<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60 [<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50 [<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000105d79b00 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 60 59 bb 8a ff ff ff ff ..Z.....`Y...... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50 [<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff110001067e6000 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140 [<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60 [<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50 [<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000103f3a800 (size 96): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 40 39 bb 8a ff ff ff ff ..Z.....@9...... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50 [<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ac0 (size 16): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.529s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 2a a7 01 01 00 11 ff .........*...... backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50 [<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf880 (size 32): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.547s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50 [<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ae0 (size 16): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b a7 01 01 00 11 ff .........+...... backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50 [<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf9c0 (size 32): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50 [<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72b00 (size 16): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 108, jiffies 4294671832 (age 763.529s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140 [<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50 [<00000000881258cc>] filter_attr_skip_test+0x148/0x770 [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Fixes: 5d31f71efcb6 ("kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites") Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Inject fault while probing drm_kunit_helpers.ko, if one of
kunit_next_attr_filter(), kunit_filter_glob_tests() and
kunit_filter_attr_tests() fails, parsed_filters,
parsed_glob.suite_glob/test_glob alloced in
kunit_parse_glob_filter() is leaked.
And the filtered_suite->test_cases alloced in kunit_filter_glob_tests()
or kunit_filter_attr_tests() may also be leaked.

unreferenced object 0xff110001067e4800 (size 1024):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  suite2..........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140
    [<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60
    [<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50
    [<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000105d79b00 (size 192):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 60 59 bb 8a ff ff ff ff  ..Z.....`Y......
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50
    [<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff110001067e6000 (size 1024):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  suite2..........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140
    [<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60
    [<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50
    [<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103f3a800 (size 96):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 40 39 bb 8a ff ff ff ff  ..Z.....@9......
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50
    [<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ac0 (size 16):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.529s)
  hex dump (first 16 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 2a a7 01 01 00 11 ff  .........*......
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50
    [<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf880 (size 32):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.547s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
    [<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ae0 (size 16):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s)
  hex dump (first 16 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b a7 01 01 00 11 ff  .........+......
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50
    [<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf9c0 (size 32):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
    [<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72b00 (size 16):
  comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 108, jiffies 4294671832 (age 763.529s)
  hex dump (first 16 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
    [<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
    [<00000000881258cc>] filter_attr_skip_test+0x148/0x770
    [<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
    [<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
    [<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
    [<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
    [<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30

Fixes: 5d31f71efcb6 ("kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites")
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_filter_suites() 2023-07-31T14:27:05+00:00 Ruan Jinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com 2023-07-29T01:00:03+00:00 5a175d369c702ce08c9feb630125c9fc7a9e1370 As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err) in filter_suites_test() tese case in kunit, both filter_count and parsed_filters will not be initialized. So it's possible to enter kunit_filter_attr_tests(), and the use of uninitialized parsed_filters will cause below wild-memory-access. RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0 ? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? __pfx_kunit_filter_suites+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kfree+0x10/0x10 ? kunit_add_action_or_reset+0x3d/0x50 filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440 ? __pfx_filter_suites_test+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10 ? try_to_wake_up+0xa8e/0x1210 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x86/0xe0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 ? set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x7c/0xb0 kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x160 ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Kernel Offset: 0x1da00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff) Rebooting in 1 seconds.. Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as
the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err)
in filter_suites_test() tese case in kunit, both filter_count and
parsed_filters will not be initialized.

So it's possible to enter kunit_filter_attr_tests(), and the use of
uninitialized parsed_filters will cause below wild-memory-access.

 RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40
 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89
 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203
 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9
 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920
 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e
 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800
 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0
  ? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220
  ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
  ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40
  ? kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40
  ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40
  ? __pfx_kunit_filter_suites+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_kfree+0x10/0x10
  ? kunit_add_action_or_reset+0x3d/0x50
  filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
  ? __pfx_filter_suites_test+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10
  ? try_to_wake_up+0xa8e/0x1210
  ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x86/0xe0
  ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10
  ? set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x7c/0xb0
  kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
  ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x160
  ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10
  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
  ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10
  kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
  </TASK>
 Modules linked in:
 Dumping ftrace buffer:
    (ftrace buffer empty)
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
 RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40
 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89
 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203
 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9
 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920
 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e
 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800
 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
 Dumping ftrace buffer:
    (ftrace buffer empty)
 Kernel Offset: 0x1da00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
 Rebooting in 1 seconds..

Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: add tests for filtering attributes 2023-07-26T19:29:41+00:00 Rae Moar rmoar@google.com 2023-07-25T21:25:19+00:00 76066f93f1df27657eb937b7c9c091e3a6abf4db Add four tests to executor_test.c to test behavior of filtering attributes. - parse_filter_attr_test - to test the parsing of inputted filters - filter_attr_test - to test the filtering procedure on attributes - filter_attr_empty_test - to test the behavior when all tests are filtered out - filter_attr_skip_test - to test the configurable filter_action=skip option Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Add four tests to executor_test.c to test behavior of filtering attributes.

- parse_filter_attr_test - to test the parsing of inputted filters

- filter_attr_test - to test the filtering procedure on attributes

- filter_attr_empty_test - to test the behavior when all tests are filtered
  out

- filter_attr_skip_test - to test the configurable filter_action=skip
  option

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: Add ability to filter attributes 2023-07-26T19:29:15+00:00 Rae Moar rmoar@google.com 2023-07-25T21:25:15+00:00 529534e8cba3e60f843a682e2a3149612b30d608 Add filtering of test attributes. Users can filter tests using the module_param called "filter". Filters are imputed in the format: <attribute_name><operation><value> Example: kunit.filter="speed>slow" Operations include: >, <, >=, <=, !=, and =. These operations will act the same for attributes of the same type but may not between types. Note multiple filters can be inputted by separating them with a comma. Example: kunit.filter="speed=slow, module!=example" Since both suites and test cases can have attributes, there may be conflicts. The process of filtering follows these rules: - Filtering always operates at a per-test level. - If a test has an attribute set, then the test's value is filtered on. - Otherwise, the value falls back to the suite's value. - If neither are set, the attribute has a global "default" value, which is used. Filtered tests will not be run or show in output. The tests can instead be skipped using the configurable option "kunit.filter_action=skip". Note the default settings for running tests remains unfiltered. Finally, add "filter" methods for the speed and module attributes to parse and compare attribute values. Note this filtering functionality will be added to kunit.py in the next patch. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Add filtering of test attributes. Users can filter tests using the
module_param called "filter".

Filters are imputed in the format: <attribute_name><operation><value>

Example: kunit.filter="speed>slow"

Operations include: >, <, >=, <=, !=, and =. These operations will act the
same for attributes of the same type but may not between types.

Note multiple filters can be inputted by separating them with a comma.
Example: kunit.filter="speed=slow, module!=example"

Since both suites and test cases can have attributes, there may be
conflicts. The process of filtering follows these rules:
- Filtering always operates at a per-test level.
- If a test has an attribute set, then the test's value is filtered on.
- Otherwise, the value falls back to the suite's value.
- If neither are set, the attribute has a global "default" value, which
  is used.

Filtered tests will not be run or show in output. The tests can instead be
skipped using the configurable option "kunit.filter_action=skip".

Note the default settings for running tests remains unfiltered.

Finally, add "filter" methods for the speed and module attributes to parse
and compare attribute values.

Note this filtering functionality will be added to kunit.py in the next
patch.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit: Add module attribute 2023-07-26T19:29:09+00:00 Rae Moar rmoar@google.com 2023-07-25T21:25:14+00:00 a00a72709175a4d53096301a8792b8171d1223e5 Add module attribute to the test attribute API. This attribute stores the module name associated with the test using KBUILD_MODNAME. The name of a test suite and the module name often do not match. A reference to the module name associated with the suite could be extremely helpful in running tests as modules without needing to check the codebase. This attribute will be printed for each suite. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> 
Add module attribute to the test attribute API. This attribute stores the
module name associated with the test using KBUILD_MODNAME.

The name of a test suite and the module name often do not match. A
reference to the module name associated with the suite could be extremely
helpful in running tests as modules without needing to check the codebase.

This attribute will be printed for each suite.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>