linux-toradex.git/mm/mempolicy.c, branch v4.4.79

mm/mempolicy.c: fix error handling in set_mempolicy and mbind.

2017-04-12T10:38:35+00:00

commit cf01fb9985e8deb25ccf0ea54d916b8871ae0e62 upstream.

In the case that compat_get_bitmap fails we do not want to copy the
bitmap to the user as it will contain uninitialized stack data and leak
sensitive data.

Signed-off-by: Chris Salls 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/mempolicy.c: do not put mempolicy before using its nodemask

2017-02-01T07:30:52+00:00

commit d51e9894d27492783fc6d1b489070b4ba66ce969 upstream.

Since commit be97a41b291e ("mm/mempolicy.c: merge alloc_hugepage_vma to
alloc_pages_vma") alloc_pages_vma() can potentially free a mempolicy by
mpol_cond_put() before accessing the embedded nodemask by
__alloc_pages_nodemask().  The commit log says it's so "we can use a
single exit path within the function" but that's clearly wrong.  We can
still do that when doing mpol_cond_put() after the allocation attempt.

Make sure the mempolicy is not freed prematurely, otherwise
__alloc_pages_nodemask() can end up using a bogus nodemask, which could
lead e.g.  to premature OOM.

Fixes: be97a41b291e ("mm/mempolicy.c: merge alloc_hugepage_vma to alloc_pages_vma")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118141124.8345-1-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: David Rientjes 
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: rename alloc_pages_exact_node() to __alloc_pages_node()

2015-09-08T22:35:28+00:00

alloc_pages_exact_node() was introduced in commit 6484eb3e2a81 ("page
allocator: do not check NUMA node ID when the caller knows the node is
valid") as an optimized variant of alloc_pages_node(), that doesn't
fallback to current node for nid == NUMA_NO_NODE.  Unfortunately the
name of the function can easily suggest that the allocation is
restricted to the given node and fails otherwise.  In truth, the node is
only preferred, unless __GFP_THISNODE is passed among the gfp flags.

The misleading name has lead to mistakes in the past, see for example
commits 5265047ac301 ("mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage
allocation to local node") and b360edb43f8e ("mm, mempolicy:
migrate_to_node should only migrate to node").

Another issue with the name is that there's a family of
alloc_pages_exact*() functions where 'exact' means exact size (instead
of page order), which leads to more confusion.

To prevent further mistakes, this patch effectively renames
alloc_pages_exact_node() to __alloc_pages_node() to better convey that
it's an optimized variant of alloc_pages_node() not intended for general
usage.  Both functions get described in comments.

It has been also considered to really provide a convenience function for
allocations restricted to a node, but the major opinion seems to be that
__GFP_THISNODE already provides that functionality and we shouldn't
duplicate the API needlessly.  The number of users would be small
anyway.

Existing callers of alloc_pages_exact_node() are simply converted to
call __alloc_pages_node(), with the exception of sba_alloc_coherent()
which open-codes the check for NUMA_NO_NODE, so it is converted to use
alloc_pages_node() instead.  This means it no longer performs some
VM_BUG_ON checks, and since the current check for nid in
alloc_pages_node() uses a 'nid < 0' comparison (which includes
NUMA_NO_NODE), it may hide wrong values which would be previously
exposed.

Both differences will be rectified by the next patch.

To sum up, this patch makes no functional changes, except temporarily
hiding potentially buggy callers.  Restricting the checks in
alloc_pages_node() is left for the next patch which can in turn expose
more existing buggy callers.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
Acked-by: Robin Holt 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter 
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Greg Thelen 
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
Cc: Pekka Enberg 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi 
Cc: Tony Luck 
Cc: Fenghua Yu 
Cc: Arnd Bergmann 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Gleb Natapov 
Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
Cc: Cliff Whickman 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/mempolicy.c: get rid of duplicated check for vma(VM_PFNMAP) in queue_pages_range()

2015-09-08T22:35:28+00:00

This check was introduced as part of
   6f4576e3687 ("mempolicy: apply page table walker on queue_pages_range()")

which got duplicated by
   48684a65b4e ("mm: pagewalk: fix misbehavior of walk_page_range for vma(VM_PFNMAP)")

by reintroducing it earlier on queue_page_test_walk()

Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski 
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Acked-by: David Rientjes 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

userfaultfd: teach vma_merge to merge across vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx

2015-09-04T23:54:41+00:00

vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx is yet another vma parameter that vma_merge
must be aware about so that we can merge vmas back like they were
originally before arming the userfaultfd on some memory range.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli 
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov 
Cc: Sanidhya Kashyap 
Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" 
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Rik van Riel 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Peter Feiner 
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: "Huangpeng (Peter)" 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, thp: respect MPOL_PREFERRED policy with non-local node

2015-06-25T00:49:46+00:00

Since commit 077fcf116c8c ("mm/thp: allocate transparent hugepages on
local node"), we handle THP allocations on page fault in a special way -
for non-interleave memory policies, the allocation is only attempted on
the node local to the current CPU, if the policy's nodemask allows the
node.

This is motivated by the assumption that THP benefits cannot offset the
cost of remote accesses, so it's better to fallback to base pages on the
local node (which might still be available, while huge pages are not due
to fragmentation) than to allocate huge pages on a remote node.

The nodemask check prevents us from violating e.g.  MPOL_BIND policies
where the local node is not among the allowed nodes.  However, the
current implementation can still give surprising results for the
MPOL_PREFERRED policy when the preferred node is different than the
current CPU's local node.

In such case we should honor the preferred node and not use the local
node, which is what this patch does.  If hugepage allocation on the
preferred node fails, we fall back to base pages and don't try other
nodes, with the same motivation as is done for the local node hugepage
allocations.  The patch also moves the MPOL_INTERLEAVE check around to
simplify the hugepage specific test.

The difference can be demonstrated using in-tree transhuge-stress test
on the following 2-node machine where half memory on one node was
occupied to show the difference.

> numactl --hardware
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
node 0 size: 7878 MB
node 0 free: 3623 MB
node 1 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
node 1 size: 8045 MB
node 1 free: 7818 MB
node distances:
node   0   1
  0:  10  21
  1:  21  10

Before the patch:
> numactl -p0 -C0 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 2.197 s/loop, 0.276 ms/page,   7249.168 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 1786 different pages

> numactl -p0 -C12 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 2.962 s/loop, 0.372 ms/page,   5376.172 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 3873 different pages

Number of successful THP allocations corresponds to free memory on node 0 in
the first case and node 1 in the second case, i.e. -p parameter is ignored and
cpu binding "wins".

After the patch:
> numactl -p0 -C0 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 2.183 s/loop, 0.274 ms/page,   7295.516 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 1760 different pages

> numactl -p0 -C12 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 2.878 s/loop, 0.361 ms/page,   5533.638 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 1750 different pages

> numactl -p1 -C0 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 4.628 s/loop, 0.581 ms/page,   3440.893 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 3918 different pages

The -p parameter is respected regardless of cpu binding.

> numactl -C0 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 2.202 s/loop, 0.277 ms/page,   7230.003 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 1750 different pages

> numactl -C12 ./transhuge-stress
transhuge-stress: 3.020 s/loop, 0.379 ms/page,   5273.324 MiB/s 7962 succeed,    0 failed, 3916 different pages

Without -p parameter, hugepage restriction to CPU-local node works as before.

Fixes: 077fcf116c8c ("mm/thp: allocate transparent hugepages on local node")
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
Acked-by: David Rientjes 
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: 	[4.0+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single node machines

2015-05-15T00:55:51+00:00

NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of
num_online_nodes (online nodes).

The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1 or higher
will enable NUMA balancing.  This will incur useless overhead due to
minor faults with the impact depending on the workload.  These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1:

  			       vanilla     patched
  NUMA base PTE updates          5113158           0
  NUMA huge PMD updates              643           0
  NUMA page range updates        5442374           0
  NUMA hint faults               2109622           0
  NUMA hint local faults         2109622           0
  NUMA hint local percent            100         100
  NUMA pages migrated                  0           0

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman 
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel 
Cc: 	[3.8+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node

2015-04-14T23:49:03+00:00

Commit 077fcf116c8c ("mm/thp: allocate transparent hugepages on local
node") restructured alloc_hugepage_vma() with the intent of only
allocating transparent hugepages locally when there was not an effective
interleave mempolicy.

alloc_pages_exact_node() does not limit the allocation to the single node,
however, but rather prefers it.  This is because __GFP_THISNODE is not set
which would cause the node-local nodemask to be passed.  Without it, only
a nodemask that prefers the local node is passed.

Fix this by passing __GFP_THISNODE and falling back to small pages when
the allocation fails.

Commit 9f1b868a13ac ("mm: thp: khugepaged: add policy for finding target
node") suffers from a similar problem for khugepaged, which is also fixed.

Fixes: 077fcf116c8c ("mm/thp: allocate transparent hugepages on local node")
Fixes: 9f1b868a13ac ("mm: thp: khugepaged: add policy for finding target node")
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes 
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Christoph Lameter 
Cc: Pekka Enberg 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Pravin Shelar 
Cc: Jarno Rajahalme 
Cc: Li Zefan 
Cc: Greg Thelen 
Cc: Tejun Heo 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, mempolicy: migrate_to_node should only migrate to node

2015-04-14T23:49:03+00:00

migrate_to_node() is intended to migrate a page from one source node to
a target node.

Today, migrate_to_node() could end up migrating to any node, not only
the target node.  This is because the page migration allocator,
new_node_page() does not pass __GFP_THISNODE to
alloc_pages_exact_node().  This causes the target node to be preferred
but allows fallback to any other node in order of affinity.

Prevent this by allocating with __GFP_THISNODE.  If memory is not
available, -ENOMEM will be returned as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes 
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: use %*pb[l] to print bitmaps including cpumasks and nodemasks

2015-02-14T05:21:38+00:00

printk and friends can now format bitmaps using '%*pb[l]'.  cpumask
and nodemask also provide cpumask_pr_args() and nodemask_pr_args()
respectively which can be used to generate the two printf arguments
necessary to format the specified cpu/nodemask.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds