commit 093facf3634da1b0c2cc7ed106f1983da901bbab upstream.

If the current process is exiting, lingering on socket close will make
it unkillable, so we should avoid it.

Reproducer:

  #include <sys/types.h>
  #include <sys/socket.h>

  #define BTPROTO_L2CAP   0
  #define BTPROTO_SCO     2
  #define BTPROTO_RFCOMM  3

  int main()
  {
          int fd;
          struct linger ling;

          fd = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_STREAM, BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
          //or: fd = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_DGRAM, BTPROTO_L2CAP);
          //or: fd = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_SEQPACKET, BTPROTO_SCO);

          ling.l_onoff = 1;
          ling.l_linger = 1000000000;
          setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, &ling, sizeof(ling));

          return 0;
  }

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>

commit 92d1372e1a9fec00e146b74e8b9ad7a385b9b37f upstream.

Kernel supports SMP Security Request so don't block increasing security
when we are slave.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Kraglak <marcin.kraglak@tieto.com>
Acked-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>

commit 8a96f3cd22878fc0bb564a8478a6e17c0b8dca73 upstream.

-[0x01 Introduction

We have found a programming error causing a deadlock in Bluetooth subsystem
of Linux kernel. The problem is caused by missing release_sock() call when
L2CAP connection creation fails due full accept queue.

The issue can be reproduced with 3.15-rc5 kernel and is also present in
earlier kernels.

-[0x02 Details

The problem occurs when multiple L2CAP connections are created to a PSM which
contains listening socket (like SDP) and left pending, for example,
configuration (the underlying ACL link is not disconnected between
connections).

When L2CAP connection request is received and listening socket is found the
l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() function (net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c) is called.
This function locks the 'parent' socket and then checks if the accept queue
is full.

1178         lock_sock(parent);
1179
1180         /* Check for backlog size */
1181         if (sk_acceptq_is_full(parent)) {
1182                 BT_DBG("backlog full %d", parent->sk_ack_backlog);
1183                 return NULL;
1184         }

If case the accept queue is full NULL is returned, but the 'parent' socket
is not released. Thus when next L2CAP connection request is received the code
blocks on lock_sock() since the parent is still locked.

Also note that for connections already established and waiting for
configuration to complete a timeout will occur and l2cap_chan_timeout()
(net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c) will be called. All threads calling this
function will also be blocked waiting for the channel mutex since the thread
which is waiting on lock_sock() alread holds the channel mutex.

We were able to reproduce this by sending continuously L2CAP connection
request followed by disconnection request containing invalid CID. This left
the created connections pending configuration.

After the deadlock occurs it is impossible to kill bluetoothd, btmon will not
get any more data etc. requiring reboot to recover.

-[0x03 Fix

Releasing the 'parent' socket when l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() returns NULL
seems to fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Jukka Taimisto <jtt@codenomicon.com>
Reported-by: Tommi Mäkilä <tmakila@codenomicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>

In future Core Specification versions the ATT CID will be just one of
many possible CIDs that can be used for data transfer. Therefore, it
makes sense to rename the define for the ATT CID to something less
ambigous.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Pull VFS updates from Al Viro,

Misc cleanups all over the place, mainly wrt /proc interfaces (switch
create_proc_entry to proc_create(), get rid of the deprecated
create_proc_read_entry() in favor of using proc_create_data() and
seq_file etc).

7kloc removed.

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (204 commits)
  don't bother with deferred freeing of fdtables
  proc: Move non-public stuff from linux/proc_fs.h to fs/proc/internal.h
  proc: Make the PROC_I() and PDE() macros internal to procfs
  proc: Supply a function to remove a proc entry by PDE
  take cgroup_open() and cpuset_open() to fs/proc/base.c
  ppc: Clean up scanlog
  ppc: Clean up rtas_flash driver somewhat
  hostap: proc: Use remove_proc_subtree()
  drm: proc: Use remove_proc_subtree()
  drm: proc: Use minor->index to label things, not PDE->name
  drm: Constify drm_proc_list[]
  zoran: Don't print proc_dir_entry data in debug
  reiserfs: Don't access the proc_dir_entry in r_open(), r_start() r_show()
  proc: Supply an accessor for getting the data from a PDE's parent
  airo: Use remove_proc_subtree()
  rtl8192u: Don't need to save device proc dir PDE
  rtl8187se: Use a dir under /proc/net/r8180/
  proc: Add proc_mkdir_data()
  proc: Move some bits from linux/proc_fs.h to linux/{of.h,signal.h,tty.h}
  proc: Move PDE_NET() to fs/proc/proc_net.c
  ...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

We need to verify that the given sockets actually are l2cap sockets. If
they aren't, we are not supposed to access bt_sk(sock) and we shouldn't
start the session if the offsets turn out to be valid local BT addresses.

That is, if someone passes a TCP socket to HIDCONNADD, then we access some
random offset in the TCP socket (which isn't even guaranteed to be valid).

Fix this by checking that the socket is an l2cap socket.

Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

After we successfully registered a socket via bt_sock_register() there is
no reason to ever check the return code of bt_sock_unregister(). If
bt_sock_unregister() fails, it means the socket _is_ already unregistered
so we have what we want, don't we?

Also, to get bt_sock_unregister() to fail, another part of the kernel has
to unregister _our_ socket. This is sooo _wrong_ that it will break way
earlier than when we unregister our socket.

Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Channel moves are triggered by changes to the BT_CHANNEL_POLICY
sockopt when an ERTM or streaming-mode channel is connected.

Moves are only started if enable_hs is true.

Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>