linux-toradex.git/net/ipv6, branch v4.4.123

netfilter: x_tables: pack percpu counter allocations

2018-03-18T10:17:52+00:00

commit ae0ac0ed6fcf5af3be0f63eb935f483f44a402d2 upstream.

instead of allocating each xt_counter individually, allocate 4k chunks
and then use these for counter allocation requests.

This should speed up rule evaluation by increasing data locality,
also speeds up ruleset loading because we reduce calls to the percpu
allocator.

As Eric points out we can't use PAGE_SIZE, page_allocator would fail on
arches with 64k page size.

Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal 
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: x_tables: pass xt_counters struct to counter allocator

2018-03-18T10:17:52+00:00

commit f28e15bacedd444608e25421c72eb2cf4527c9ca upstream.

Keeps some noise away from a followup patch.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal 
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: x_tables: pass xt_counters struct instead of packet counter

2018-03-18T10:17:52+00:00

commit 4d31eef5176df06f218201bc9c0ce40babb41660 upstream.

On SMP we overload the packet counter (unsigned long) to contain
percpu offset.  Hide this from callers and pass xt_counters address
instead.

Preparation patch to allocate the percpu counters in page-sized batch
chunks.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal 
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: ipv6: fix use-after-free Write in nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt

2018-03-18T10:17:51+00:00

commit b078556aecd791b0e5cb3a59f4c3a14273b52121 upstream.

l4proto->manip_pkt() can cause reallocation of skb head so pointer
to the ipv6 header must be reloaded.

Reported-and-tested-by: 
Fixes: 58a317f1061c89 ("netfilter: ipv6: add IPv6 NAT support")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: add back stackpointer size checks

2018-03-18T10:17:51+00:00

commit 57ebd808a97d7c5b1e1afb937c2db22beba3c1f8 upstream.

The rationale for removing the check is only correct for rulesets
generated by ip(6)tables.

In iptables, a jump can only occur to a user-defined chain, i.e.
because we size the stack based on number of user-defined chains we
cannot exceed stack size.

However, the underlying binary format has no such restriction,
and the validation step only ensures that the jump target is a
valid rule start point.

IOW, its possible to build a rule blob that has no user-defined
chains but does contain a jump.

If this happens, no jump stack gets allocated and crash occurs
because no jumpstack was allocated.

Fixes: 7814b6ec6d0d6 ("netfilter: xtables: don't save/restore jumpstack offset")
Reported-by: syzbot+e783f671527912cd9403@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

udplite: fix partial checksum initialization

2018-03-11T15:19:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 15f35d49c93f4fa9875235e7bf3e3783d2dd7a1b ]

Since UDP-Lite is always using checksum, the following path is
triggered when calculating pseudo header for it:

  udp4_csum_init() or udp6_csum_init()
    skb_checksum_init_zero_check()
      __skb_checksum_validate_complete()

The problem can appear if skb->len is less than CHECKSUM_BREAK. In
this particular case __skb_checksum_validate_complete() also invokes
__skb_checksum_complete(skb). If UDP-Lite is using partial checksum
that covers only part of a packet, the function will return bad
checksum and the packet will be dropped.

It can be fixed if we skip skb_checksum_init_zero_check() and only
set the required pseudo header checksum for UDP-Lite with partial
checksum before udp4_csum_init()/udp6_csum_init() functions return.

Fixes: ed70fcfcee95 ("net: Call skb_checksum_init in IPv4")
Fixes: e4f45b7f40bd ("net: Call skb_checksum_init in IPv6")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ipv6 sit: work around bogus gcc-8 -Wrestrict warning

2018-03-11T15:19:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit ca79bec237f5809a7c3c59bd41cd0880aa889966 ]

gcc-8 has a new warning that detects overlapping input and output arguments
in memcpy(). It triggers for sit_init_net() calling ipip6_tunnel_clone_6rd(),
which is actually correct:

net/ipv6/sit.c: In function 'sit_init_net':
net/ipv6/sit.c:192:3: error: 'memcpy' source argument is the same as destination [-Werror=restrict]

The problem here is that the logic detecting the memcpy() arguments finds them
to be the same, but the conditional that tests for the input and output of
ipip6_tunnel_clone_6rd() to be identical is not a compile-time constant.

We know that netdev_priv(t->dev) is the same as t for a tunnel device,
and comparing "dev" directly here lets the compiler figure out as well
that 'dev == sitn->fb_tunnel_dev' when called from sit_init_net(), so
it no longer warns.

This code is old, so Cc stable to make sure that we don't get the warning
for older kernels built with new gcc.

Cc: Martin Sebor 
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ipv6: icmp6: Allow icmp messages to be looped back

2018-03-03T09:19:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 588753f1eb18978512b1c9b85fddb457d46f9033 ]

One example of when an ICMPv6 packet is required to be looped back is
when a host acts as both a Multicast Listener and a Multicast Router.

A Multicast Router will listen on address ff02::16 for MLDv2 messages.

Currently, MLDv2 messages originating from a Multicast Listener running
on the same host as the Multicast Router are not being delivered to the
Multicast Router. This is due to dst.input being assigned the default
value of dst_discard.

This results in the packet being looped back but discarded before being
delivered to the Multicast Router.

This patch sets dst.input to ip6_input to ensure a looped back packet
is delivered to the Multicast Router.

Signed-off-by: Brendan McGrath 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ip_tunnel: replace dst_cache with generic implementation

2018-02-28T09:17:21+00:00

commit e09acddf873bf775b208b452a4c3a3fd26fa9427 upstream.

The current ip_tunnel cache implementation is prone to a race
that will cause the wrong dst to be cached on cuncurrent dst cache
miss and ip tunnel update via netlink.

Replacing with the generic implementation fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni 
Suggested-and-acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Cc: Nathan Chancellor 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: drop outermost socket lock in getsockopt()

2018-02-28T09:17:21+00:00

commit 01ea306f2ac2baff98d472da719193e738759d93 upstream.

The Syzbot reported a possible deadlock in the netfilter area caused by
rtnl lock, xt lock and socket lock being acquired with a different order
on different code paths, leading to the following backtrace:
Reviewed-by: Xin Long 

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0+ #301 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syzkaller233489/4179 is trying to acquire lock:
  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000048e996fd>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
net/core/rtnetlink.c:74

but task is already holding lock:
  (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000328553a2>]
xt_find_table_lock+0x3e/0x3e0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:1041

which lock already depends on the new lock.
===

Since commit 3f34cfae1230 ("netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock lock
only in the required scope"), we already acquire the socket lock in
the innermost scope, where needed. In such commit I forgot to remove
the outer-most socket lock from the getsockopt() path, this commit
addresses the issues dropping it now.

v1 -> v2: fix bad subj, added relavant 'fixes' tag

Fixes: 22265a5c3c10 ("netfilter: xt_TEE: resolve oif using netdevice notifiers")
Fixes: 202f59afd441 ("netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: do not hold dev")
Fixes: 3f34cfae1230 ("netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock lock only in the required scope")
Reported-by: syzbot+ddde1c7b7ff7442d7f2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal 
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman