linux-toradex.git/net/netfilter, branch v4.9.62

netfilter: nft_meta: deal with PACKET_LOOPBACK in netdev family

2017-11-15T14:53:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit f169fd695b192dd7b23aff8e69d25a1bc881bbfa ]

After adding the following nft rule, then ping 224.0.0.1:
  # nft add rule netdev t c pkttype host counter

The warning complain message will be printed out again and again:
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10182 at net/netfilter/nft_meta.c:163 \
           nft_meta_get_eval+0x3fe/0x460 [nft_meta]
  [...]
  Call Trace:
  
  dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
  __warn+0xcb/0xf0
  warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
  nft_meta_get_eval+0x3fe/0x460 [nft_meta]
  nft_do_chain+0xff/0x5e0 [nf_tables]

So we should deal with PACKET_LOOPBACK in netdev family too. For ipv4,
convert it to PACKET_BROADCAST/MULTICAST according to the destination
address's type; For ipv6, convert it to PACKET_MULTICAST directly.

Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: nf_ct_expect: Change __nf_ct_expect_check() return value.

2017-10-21T15:21:34+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4b86c459c7bee3acaf92f0e2b4c6ac803eaa1a58 ]

Commit 4dee62b1b9b4 ("netfilter: nf_ct_expect: nf_ct_expect_insert()
returns void") inadvertently changed the successful return value of
nf_ct_expect_related_report() from 0 to 1 due to
__nf_ct_expect_check() returning 1 on success.  Prevent this
regression in the future by changing the return value of
__nf_ct_expect_check() to 0 on success.

Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme 
Acked-by: Joe Stringer 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix incorrect helper->expect_class_max

2017-10-08T08:26:10+00:00

[ Upstream commit ae5c682113f9f94cc5e76f92cf041ee624c173ee ]

The helper->expect_class_max must be set to the total number of
expect_policy minus 1, since we will use the statement "if (class >
helper->expect_class_max)" to validate the CTA_EXPECT_CLASS attr in
ctnetlink_alloc_expect.

So for compatibility, set the helper->expect_class_max to the
NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM attr's value minus 1.

Also: it's invalid when the NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM attr's value is zero.
1. this will result "expect_policy = kzalloc(0, GFP_KERNEL);";
2. we cannot set the helper->expect_class_max to a proper value.

So if nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM]) is zero, report -EINVAL to
the userspace.

Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: invoke synchronize_rcu after set the _hook_ to NULL

2017-10-08T08:26:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3b7dabf029478bb80507a6c4500ca94132a2bc0b ]

Otherwise, another CPU may access the invalid pointer. For example:
    CPU0                CPU1
     -              rcu_read_lock();
     -              pfunc = _hook_;
  _hook_ = NULL;          -
  mod unload              -
     -                 pfunc(); // invalid, panic
     -             rcu_read_unlock();

So we must call synchronize_rcu() to wait the rcu reader to finish.

Also note, in nf_nat_snmp_basic_fini, synchronize_rcu() will be invoked
by later nf_conntrack_helper_unregister, but I'm inclined to add a
explicit synchronize_rcu after set the nf_nat_snmp_hook to NULL. Depend
on such obscure assumptions is not a good idea.

Last, in nfnetlink_cttimeout, we use kfree_rcu to free the time object,
so in cttimeout_exit, invoking rcu_barrier() is not necessary at all,
remove it too.

Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: Fix net_conntrack_lock()

2017-09-27T12:39:24+00:00

commit 3ef0c7a730de0bae03d86c19570af764fa3c4445 upstream.

As we want to remove spin_unlock_wait() and replace it with explicit
spin_lock()/spin_unlock() calls, we can use this to simplify the
locking.

In addition:
- Reading nf_conntrack_locks_all needs ACQUIRE memory ordering.
- The new code avoids the backwards loop.

Only slightly tested, I did not manage to trigger calls to
nf_conntrack_all_lock().

V2: With improved comments, to clearly show how the barriers
    pair.

Fixes: b16c29191dc8 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: use safer way to lock all buckets")
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul 
Cc: Alan Stern 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: nat: fix src map lookup

2017-08-30T08:21:51+00:00

commit 97772bcd56efa21d9d8976db6f205574ea602f51 upstream.

When doing initial conversion to rhashtable I replaced the bucket
walk with a single rhashtable_lookup_fast().

When moving to rhlist I failed to properly walk the list of identical
tuples, but that is what is needed for this to work correctly.
The table contains the original tuples, so the reply tuples are all
distinct.

We currently decide that mapping is (not) in range only based on the
first entry, but in case its not we need to try the reply tuple of the
next entry until we either find an in-range mapping or we checked
all the entries.

This bug makes nat core attempt collision resolution while it might be
able to use the mapping as-is.

Fixes: 870190a9ec90 ("netfilter: nat: convert nat bysrc hash to rhashtable")
Reported-by: Jaco Kroon 
Tested-by: Jaco Kroon 
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: nf_ct_ext: fix possible panic after nf_ct_extend_unregister

2017-08-25T00:12:18+00:00

commit 9c3f3794926a997b1cab6c42480ff300efa2d162 upstream.

If one cpu is doing nf_ct_extend_unregister while another cpu is doing
__nf_ct_ext_add_length, then we may hit BUG_ON(t == NULL). Moreover,
there's no synchronize_rcu invocation after set nf_ct_ext_types[id] to
NULL, so it's possible that we may access invalid pointer.

But actually, most of the ct extends are built-in, so the problem listed
above will not happen. However, there are two exceptions: NF_CT_EXT_NAT
and NF_CT_EXT_SYNPROXY.

For _EXT_NAT, the panic will not happen, since adding the nat extend and
unregistering the nat extend are located in the same file(nf_nat_core.c),
this means that after the nat module is removed, we cannot add the nat
extend too.

For _EXT_SYNPROXY, synproxy extend may be added by init_conntrack, while
synproxy extend unregister will be done by synproxy_core_exit. So after
nf_synproxy_core.ko is removed, we may still try to add the synproxy
extend, then kernel panic may happen.

I know it's very hard to reproduce this issue, but I can play a tricky
game to make it happen very easily :)

Step 1. Enable SYNPROXY for tcp dport 1234 at FORWARD hook:
  # iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp --dport 1234 -j SYNPROXY
Step 2. Queue the syn packet to the userspace at raw table OUTPUT hook.
        Also note, in the userspace we only add a 20s' delay, then
        reinject the syn packet to the kernel:
  # iptables -t raw -I OUTPUT -p tcp --syn -j NFQUEUE --queue-num 1
Step 3. Using "nc 2.2.2.2 1234" to connect the server.
Step 4. Now remove the nf_synproxy_core.ko quickly:
  # iptables -F FORWARD
  # rmmod ipt_SYNPROXY
  # rmmod nf_synproxy_core
Step 5. After 20s' delay, the syn packet is reinjected to the kernel.

Now you will see the panic like this:
  kernel BUG at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c:91!
  Call Trace:
   ? __nf_ct_ext_add_length+0x53/0x3c0 [nf_conntrack]
   init_conntrack+0x12b/0x600 [nf_conntrack]
   nf_conntrack_in+0x4cc/0x580 [nf_conntrack]
   ipv4_conntrack_local+0x48/0x50 [nf_conntrack_ipv4]
   nf_reinject+0x104/0x270
   nfqnl_recv_verdict+0x3e1/0x5f9 [nfnetlink_queue]
   ? nfqnl_recv_verdict+0x5/0x5f9 [nfnetlink_queue]
   ? nla_parse+0xa0/0x100
   nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x175/0x6a9 [nfnetlink]
   [...]

One possible solution is to make NF_CT_EXT_SYNPROXY extend built-in, i.e.
introduce nf_conntrack_synproxy.c and only do ct extend register and
unregister in it, similar to nf_conntrack_timeout.c.

But having such a obscure restriction of nf_ct_extend_unregister is not a
good idea, so we should invoke synchronize_rcu after set nf_ct_ext_types
to NULL, and check the NULL pointer when do __nf_ct_ext_add_length. Then
it will be easier if we add new ct extend in the future.

Last, we use kfree_rcu to free nf_ct_ext, so rcu_barrier() is unnecessary
anymore, remove it too.

Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang 
Acked-by: Florian Westphal 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Cc: Stefan Bader 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ipvs: SNAT packet replies only for NATed connections

2017-07-27T22:08:00+00:00

commit 3c5ab3f395d66a9e4e937fcfdf6ebc63894f028b upstream.

We do not check if packet from real server is for NAT
connection before performing SNAT. This causes problems
for setups that use DR/TUN and allow local clients to
access the real server directly, for example:

- local client in director creates IPVS-DR/TUN connection
CIP->VIP and the request packets are routed to RIP.
Talks are finished but IPVS connection is not expired yet.

- second local client creates non-IPVS connection CIP->RIP
with same reply tuple RIP->CIP and when replies are received
on LOCAL_IN we wrongly assign them for the first client
connection because RIP->CIP matches the reply direction.
As result, IPVS SNATs replies for non-IPVS connections.

The problem is more visible to local UDP clients but in rare
cases it can happen also for TCP or remote clients when the
real server sends the reply traffic via the director.

So, better to be more precise for the reply traffic.
As replies are not expected for DR/TUN connections, better
to not touch them.

Reported-by: Nick Moriarty 
Tested-by: Nick Moriarty 
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov 
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: synproxy: fix conntrackd interaction

2017-07-05T12:40:16+00:00

commit 87e94dbc210a720a34be5c1174faee5c84be963e upstream.

This patch fixes the creation of connection tracking entry from
netlink when synproxy is used. It was missing the addition of
the synproxy extension.

This was causing kernel crashes when a conntrack entry created by
conntrackd was used after the switch of traffic from active node
to the passive node.

Signed-off-by: Eric Leblond 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: xt_TCPMSS: add more sanity tests on tcph->doff

2017-07-05T12:40:16+00:00

commit 2638fd0f92d4397884fd991d8f4925cb3f081901 upstream.

Denys provided an awesome KASAN report pointing to an use
after free in xt_TCPMSS

I have provided three patches to fix this issue, either in xt_TCPMSS or
in xt_tcpudp.c. It seems xt_TCPMSS patch has the smallest possible
impact.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko 
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman