linux-toradex.git/net/rxrpc, branch v4.9.87

rxrpc: Fix send in rxrpc_send_data_packet()

2018-03-11T15:21:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit 93c62c45ed5fad1b87e3a45835b251cd68de9c46 ]

All the kernel_sendmsg() calls in rxrpc_send_data_packet() need to send
both parts of the iov[] buffer, but one of them does not.  Fix it so that
it does.

Without this, short IPv6 rxrpc DATA packets may be seen that have the rxrpc
header included, but no payload.

Fixes: 5a924b8951f8 ("rxrpc: Don't store the rxrpc header in the Tx queue sk_buffs")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Ignore BUSY packets on old calls

2017-12-20T09:07:25+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4d4a6ac73e7466c2085c307fac41f74ce4568a45 ]

If we receive a BUSY packet for a call we think we've just completed, the
packet is handed off to the connection processor to deal with - but the
connection processor doesn't expect a BUSY packet and so flags a protocol
error.

Fix this by simply ignoring the BUSY packet for the moment.

The symptom of this may appear as a system call failing with EPROTO.  This
may be triggered by pressing ctrl-C under some circumstances.

This comes about we abort calls due to interruption by a signal (which we
shouldn't do, but that's going to be a large fix and mostly in fs/afs/).
What happens is that we abort the call and may also abort follow up calls
too (this needs offloading somehoe).  So we see a transmission of something
like the following sequence of packets:

	DATA for call N
	ABORT call N
	DATA for call N+1
	ABORT call N+1

in very quick succession on the same channel.  However, the peer may have
deferred the processing of the ABORT from the call N to a background thread
and thus sees the DATA message from the call N+1 coming in before it has
cleared the channel.  Thus it sends a BUSY packet[*].

[*] Note that some implementations (OpenAFS, for example) mark the BUSY
    packet with one plus the callNumber of the call prior to call N.
    Ordinarily, this would be call N, but there's no requirement for the
    calls on a channel to be numbered strictly sequentially (the number is
    required to increase).

    This is wrong and means that the callNumber in the BUSY packet should
    be ignored (it really ought to be N+1 since that's what it's in
    response to).

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Wake up the transmitter if Rx window size increases on the peer

2017-12-20T09:07:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit 702f2ac87a9a8da23bf8506466bc70175fc970b2 ]

The RxRPC ACK packet may contain an extension that includes the peer's
current Rx window size for this call.  We adjust the local Tx window size
to match.  However, the transmitter can stall if the receive window is
reduced to 0 by the peer and then reopened.

This is because the normal way that the transmitter is re-energised is by
dropping something out of our Tx queue and thus making space.  When a
single gap is made, the transmitter is woken up.  However, because there's
nothing in the Tx queue at this point, this doesn't happen.

To fix this, perform a wake_up() any time we see the peer's Rx window size
increasing.

The observable symptom is that calls start failing on ETIMEDOUT and the
following:

	kAFS: SERVER DEAD state=-62

appears in dmesg.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Fix several cases where a padded len isn't checked in ticket decode

2017-06-29T11:00:31+00:00

commit 5f2f97656ada8d811d3c1bef503ced266fcd53a0 upstream.

This fixes CVE-2017-7482.

When a kerberos 5 ticket is being decoded so that it can be loaded into an
rxrpc-type key, there are several places in which the length of a
variable-length field is checked to make sure that it's not going to
overrun the available data - but the data is padded to the nearest
four-byte boundary and the code doesn't check for this extra.  This could
lead to the size-remaining variable wrapping and the data pointer going
over the end of the buffer.

Fix this by making the various variable-length data checks use the padded
length.

Reported-by: 石磊 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne 
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Fix checking of error from ip6_route_output()

2016-10-13T07:43:17+00:00

ip6_route_output() doesn't return a negative error when it fails, rather
the ->error field of the returned dst_entry struct needs to be checked.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter 
Fixes: 75b54cb57ca3 ("rxrpc: Add IPv6 support")
Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix checker warning by not passing always-zero value to ERR_PTR()

2016-10-13T07:39:52+00:00

Fix the following checker warning:

	net/rxrpc/call_object.c:279 rxrpc_new_client_call()
	warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'

where a value that's always zero is passed to ERR_PTR() so that it can be
passed to a tracepoint in an auxiliary pointer field.

Just pass NULL instead to the tracepoint.

Fixes: a84a46d73050 ("rxrpc: Add some additional call tracing")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Don't request an ACK on the last DATA packet of a call's Tx phase

2016-10-06T07:11:51+00:00

Don't request an ACK on the last DATA packet of a call's Tx phase as for a
client there will be a reply packet or some sort of ACK to shift phase.  If
the ACK is requested, OpenAFS sends a REQUESTED-ACK ACK with soft-ACKs in
it and doesn't follow up with a hard-ACK.

If we don't set the flag, OpenAFS will send a DELAY ACK that hard-ACKs the
reply data, thereby allowing the call to terminate cleanly.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Need to produce an ACK for service op if op takes a long time

2016-10-06T07:11:50+00:00

We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we
start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected.
This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its
resources.

To make this work:

 (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to
     the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel
     the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet
     of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase).

 (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding
     call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function
     out.

 (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear.

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Return negative error code to kernel service

2016-10-06T07:11:50+00:00

In rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(), when we return the error number incurred by a
failed call, we must negate it before returning it as it's stored as
positive (that's what we have to pass back to userspace).

Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Add missing notification

2016-10-06T07:11:50+00:00

The call's background processor work item needs to notify the socket when
it completes a call so that recvmsg() or the AFS fs can deal with it.
Without this, call expiry isn't handled.

Signed-off-by: David Howells