linux-toradex.git/sound/soc, branch v3.10.76 Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules ASoC: wm8955: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:11+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:13+00:00 fec1216edd30446866e5401200a1b4caccc2c211 commit 07892b10356f17717abdc578acbef72db86c880e upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 07892b10356f17717abdc578acbef72db86c880e upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: adav80x: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:11+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:03+00:00 f891dcc0215b8446663e4fe676a1faa4d9147bba commit 2bf4c1d483d911cda5dd385527194d23e5cea73d upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 2bf4c1d483d911cda5dd385527194d23e5cea73d upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: ak4641: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:11+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:04+00:00 dbe295e3b9cac8bdd473a06f486e7be4d1be892d commit 08641d9b7bf915144a57a736b42642e13eb1167f upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 08641d9b7bf915144a57a736b42642e13eb1167f upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: wm8904: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:12+00:00 497c25dfe2a79124b836b4e3b1bb0d757d9a6749 commit eaddf6fd959074f6a6e71deffe079c71eef35da6 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit eaddf6fd959074f6a6e71deffe079c71eef35da6 upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: wm8903: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:11+00:00 5ad54384599e6de5add90e8f8108792f99369475 commit 24cc883c1fd16df34211ae41624aa6d3cd906693 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 24cc883c1fd16df34211ae41624aa6d3cd906693 upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: wm2000: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:09+00:00 40dda5673ba1aa9a1c22fd3387ec3c79b8ad5794 commit 00a14c2968e3d55817e0fa35c78106ca840537bf upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 00a14c2968e3d55817e0fa35c78106ca840537bf upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: wm8731: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:10+00:00 8f1208b631dd911ad870a39922d481498104a1f9 commit bd14016fbf31aa199026f1e2358eab695f374eb1 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit bd14016fbf31aa199026f1e2358eab695f374eb1 upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: tas5086: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:08+00:00 330ed4b9b6f40e6d1e7ef628e22adf202028715d commit 4c523ef61160b7d478371ddc9f48c8ce0a00d675 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4c523ef61160b7d478371ddc9f48c8ce0a00d675 upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: wm8960: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:14+00:00 1290b015b701b4c772251e63da5866974e5ccb77 commit b4a18c8b1af15ebfa9054a3d2aef7b0a7e6f2a05 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b4a18c8b1af15ebfa9054a3d2aef7b0a7e6f2a05 upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ASoC: cs4271: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl 2015-04-13T12:02:10+00:00 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de 2015-03-10T11:39:05+00:00 574947bf3ce72410455e76d11ac57c3da69d36d8 commit e8371aa0fecb73fb8a4b2e0296b025b11e7d6229 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e8371aa0fecb73fb8a4b2e0296b025b11e7d6229 upstream.

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>