Allow test programs to determine their thread ID. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Note that mov to 32-bit register will zero extend to 64-bit register. Thus `mov $60,%eax` has the same effect with `mov $60,%rax`. Use the shorter opcode to achieve the same thing. ``` b8 3c 00 00 00 mov $60,%eax (5 bytes) [1] 48 c7 c0 3c 00 00 00 mov $60,%rax (7 bytes) [2] ``` Currently, we use [2]. Change it to [1] for shorter code. Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@students.amikom.ac.id> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Linux x86-64 syscall only clobbers rax, rcx and r11 (and "memory").
- rax for the return value.
- rcx to save the return address.
- r11 to save the rflags.
Other registers are preserved.
Having r8, r9 and r10 in the syscall clobber list is harmless, but this
results in a missed-optimization.
As the syscall doesn't clobber r8-r10, GCC should be allowed to reuse
their value after the syscall returns to userspace. But since they are
in the clobber list, GCC will always miss this opportunity.
Remove them from the x86-64 syscall clobber list to help GCC generate
better code and fix the comment.
See also the x86-64 ABI, section A.2 AMD64 Linux Kernel Conventions,
A.2.1 Calling Conventions [1].
Extra note:
Some people may think it does not really give a benefit to remove r8,
r9 and r10 from the syscall clobber list because the impression of
syscall is a C function call, and function call always clobbers those 3.
However, that is not the case for nolibc.h, because we have a potential
to inline the "syscall" instruction (which its opcode is "0f 05") to the
user functions.
All syscalls in the nolibc.h are written as a static function with inline
ASM and are likely always inline if we use optimization flag, so this is
a profit not to have r8, r9 and r10 in the clobber list.
Here is the example where this matters.
Consider the following C code:
```
#include "tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h"
#define read_abc(a, b, c) __asm__ volatile("nop"::"r"(a),"r"(b),"r"(c))
int main(void)
{
int a = 0xaa;
int b = 0xbb;
int c = 0xcc;
read_abc(a, b, c);
write(1, "test\n", 5);
read_abc(a, b, c);
return 0;
}
```
Compile with:
gcc -Os test.c -o test -nostdlib
With r8, r9, r10 in the clobber list, GCC generates this:
0000000000001000 <main>:
1000: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
1004: 41 54 push %r12
1006: 41 bc cc 00 00 00 mov $0xcc,%r12d
100c: 55 push %rbp
100d: bd bb 00 00 00 mov $0xbb,%ebp
1012: 53 push %rbx
1013: bb aa 00 00 00 mov $0xaa,%ebx
1018: 90 nop
1019: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
101e: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi
1023: ba 05 00 00 00 mov $0x5,%edx
1028: 48 8d 35 d1 0f 00 00 lea 0xfd1(%rip),%rsi
102f: 0f 05 syscall
1031: 90 nop
1032: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
1034: 5b pop %rbx
1035: 5d pop %rbp
1036: 41 5c pop %r12
1038: c3 ret
GCC thinks that syscall will clobber r8, r9, r10. So it spills 0xaa,
0xbb and 0xcc to callee saved registers (r12, rbp and rbx). This is
clearly extra memory access and extra stack size for preserving them.
But syscall does not actually clobber them, so this is a missed
optimization.
Now without r8, r9, r10 in the clobber list, GCC generates better code:
0000000000001000 <main>:
1000: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
1004: 41 b8 aa 00 00 00 mov $0xaa,%r8d
100a: 41 b9 bb 00 00 00 mov $0xbb,%r9d
1010: 41 ba cc 00 00 00 mov $0xcc,%r10d
1016: 90 nop
1017: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
101c: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi
1021: ba 05 00 00 00 mov $0x5,%edx
1026: 48 8d 35 d3 0f 00 00 lea 0xfd3(%rip),%rsi
102d: 0f 05 syscall
102f: 90 nop
1030: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
1032: c3 ret
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@students.amikom.ac.id>
Link: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/wikis/x86-64-psABI [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211011040344.437264-1-ammar.faizi@students.amikom.ac.id/
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Ammar Faizi reported that our exit code handling is wrong. We truncate
it to the lowest 8 bits but the syscall itself is expected to take a
regular 32-bit signed integer, not an unsigned char. It's the kernel
that later truncates it to the lowest 8 bits. The difference is visible
in strace, where the program below used to show exit(255) instead of
exit(-1):
int main(void)
{
return -1;
}
This patch applies the fix to all archs. x86_64, i386, arm64, armv7 and
mips were all tested and confirmed to work fine now. Risc-v was not
tested but the change is trivial and exactly the same as for other archs.
Reported-by: Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@students.amikom.ac.id>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
After re-checking in the spec and comparing stack offsets with glibc, The last pushed argument must be 16-byte aligned (i.e. aligned before the call) so that in the callee esp+4 is multiple of 16, so the principle is the 32-bit equivalent to what Ammar fixed for x86_64. It's possible that 32-bit code using SSE2 or MMX could have been affected. In addition the frame pointer ought to be zero at the deepest level. Link: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/i386-ABI/-/wikis/Intel386-psABI Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@students.amikom.ac.id> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Before this patch, the `_start` function looks like this:
```
0000000000001170 <_start>:
1170: pop %rdi
1171: mov %rsp,%rsi
1174: lea 0x8(%rsi,%rdi,8),%rdx
1179: and $0xfffffffffffffff0,%rsp
117d: sub $0x8,%rsp
1181: call 1000 <main>
1186: movzbq %al,%rdi
118a: mov $0x3c,%rax
1191: syscall
1193: hlt
1194: data16 cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
119f: nop
```
Note the "and" to %rsp with $-16, it makes the %rsp be 16-byte aligned,
but then there is a "sub" with $0x8 which makes the %rsp no longer
16-byte aligned, then it calls main. That's the bug!
What actually the x86-64 System V ABI mandates is that right before the
"call", the %rsp must be 16-byte aligned, not after the "call". So the
"sub" with $0x8 here breaks the alignment. Remove it.
An example where this rule matters is when the callee needs to align
its stack at 16-byte for aligned move instruction, like `movdqa` and
`movaps`. If the callee can't align its stack properly, it will result
in segmentation fault.
x86-64 System V ABI also mandates the deepest stack frame should be
zero. Just to be safe, let's zero the %rbp on startup as the content
of %rbp may be unspecified when the program starts. Now it looks like
this:
```
0000000000001170 <_start>:
1170: pop %rdi
1171: mov %rsp,%rsi
1174: lea 0x8(%rsi,%rdi,8),%rdx
1179: xor %ebp,%ebp # zero the %rbp
117b: and $0xfffffffffffffff0,%rsp # align the %rsp
117f: call 1000 <main>
1184: movzbq %al,%rdi
1188: mov $0x3c,%rax
118f: syscall
1191: hlt
1192: data16 cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
119d: nopl (%rax)
```
Cc: Bedirhan KURT <windowz414@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Louvian Lyndal <louvianlyndal@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Peter Cordes <peter@cordes.ca>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@students.amikom.ac.id>
[wt: I did this on purpose due to a misunderstanding of the spec, other
archs will thus have to be rechecked, particularly i386]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Allow users to implement shorter delays than a full second by implementing msleep(). Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
s/occured/occurred/ Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The documentation header in the nolibc.h file provides an example command
line, but it places the -lgcc argument before the source files, which
can fail with libgcc.a (e.g. on ARM when uidiv is needed). This commit
therefore moves the -lgcc to the end of the command line, hopefully
before this example leaks into makefiles. This is a port of nolibc's
upstream commit b5e282089223 to the Linux kernel.
Fixes: 66b6f755ad45 ("rcutorture: Import a copy of nolibc")
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Some syscalls can be implemented from different __NR_* variants. For example, sys_dup2() can be implemented based on __NR_dup3 or __NR_dup2. In this case it is useful to mention both alternatives in error messages when neither are detected. This information will help the user search for the right one (e.g __NR_dup3) instead of just the fallback (__NR_dup2) which might not exist on the platform. This is a port of nolibc's upstream commit a21080d2ba41 to the Linux kernel. Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120145447.GC77728@C02TD0UTHF1T.local/ Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64] Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>