If git bisect reply is being used in the bisect tests, don't bother
doing the git bisect good or git bisect bad calls. The git bisect
reply will override them anyway, and that's called immediately
after the other two. Going the git bisect (good|bad) is just a
waste of time.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

The reboot function when rebooting back to a good kernel has a check
to make sure that a new kernel was indeed booted. But that check
uses a timeout value, which when calling the monitor will still
return success if the timeout is hit (no bug was found). It should
return an error to let the reboot code know that a new kernel was
not reached. Only the reboot code checks the return value of the
monitor.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

When doing a manual bisect, a build can fail or a test can be inconclusive.
In these cases it would be helpful to be able to skip the test entirely.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409164021-2136-1-git-send-email-chris.j.arges@canonical.com

Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Add a way to run a patchcheck test on the commits that are in one branch
but not in another. This uses git cherry to find a list of commits to
test each one with.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

With the more robust config_bisect, the documentation is out of
date and needs to be updated.

The new rewrite allows for finding missing configs and such, and
is much more robust to use.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

After the rewrite of the config bisect, the bisect manual was
removed. Add it back.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

After the rewrite of the config bisect, there were several unused
functions that can be removed.

One of the unused functions printed out the failed config nicer than
what the rewrite did, so I kept that and used it to output the
bad config.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

The new rewrite left out the CONFIG_BISECT_CHECK, which allows the
user to test that their "bad" config still is bad and their "good"
config still is good. This is especially important as the configs
are passed through a "make oldconfig" to update them with the lastest
kernel. Things could change that causes a bad config to work, or a
good config to break. The check is done after the configs have run
through the oldconfig processing.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

I never liked the way config-bisect worked. I would assume the bad config
had some config that broke the system. But it would not work if the bad
config just happened to be missing something that the good config had.

I rewrote the config-bisect to do this properly. It does a diff of the two
configs, and sets half of the configs that are in one and not the other.
The way it works is that when it "sets", it really just makes one copy
what the other has. That is, a "set" can be setting a:

  # CONFIG_FOO is not set

Basically, it looks at the differences between the two files and makes
them similar until it comes down to one config that makes it work or
not work depending on if it is set or not.

Note, if more than one config change makes the bad config not work, it
will only find one of them. But this is true with all bisect logic.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Some cleanup for improving readability as follows.

  - Initialize $ktest_config at its definition.
  - Put parentheses around the `config-file' argument in the usage message
    because it's a optional one.
  - Rename get_ktest_config{,s} to more descriptive get_mandatory_config{,s}.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87fvmr30kb.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>