linux-toradex.git/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum, branch master

selftests: forwarding: lib: Split setup_wait()

2025-06-27T00:53:07+00:00

setup_wait() takes an optional argument and then is called from the top
level of the test script. That confuses shellcheck, which thinks that maybe
the intention is to pass $1 of the script to the function, which is never
the case. To avoid having to annotate every single new test with a SC
disable, split the function in two: one that takes a mandatory argument,
and one that takes no argument at all.

Convert the two existing users of that optional argument, both in Spectrum
resource selftest, to use the new form. Clean up vxlan_bridge_1q_mc_ul.sh
to not pass a now-unused argument.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/8e13123236fe3912ae29bc04a1528bdd8551da1f.1750847794.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftests: forwarding: Change inappropriate log_test_skip() calls

2024-03-29T01:03:42+00:00

The SKIP return should be used for cases where tooling of the machine under
test is lacking. For cases where HW is lacking, the appropriate outcome is
XFAIL.

This is the case with ethtool_rmon and mlxsw_lib. For these, introduce a
new helper, log_test_xfail().

Do the same for router_mpath_nh_lib. Note that it will be fixed using a
more reusable way in a following patch.

For the two resource_scale selftests, the log should simply not be written,
because there is no problem.

Cc: Tobias Waldekranz 
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3d668d8fb6fa0d9eeb47ce6d9e54114348c7c179.1711464583.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftests: mlxsw: Add scale test for port ranges

2023-07-12T23:57:18+00:00

Query the maximum number of supported port range registers using
devlink-resource and test that this number can be reached by configuring
tc filters with different port ranges. Test that an error is returned in
case the maximum number is exceeded.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata 
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/48eee181270d9f291e09d1858c7b26a3f7fcc164.1689092769.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftests: mlxsw: spectrum: q_in_vni_veto: Disable IPv6 autogen on a bridge

2023-06-21T21:02:52+00:00

In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.

At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge, the bridge
MAC address does not have the same prefix as other interfaces in the
system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all the RIFs have to have the same
38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge does not obey this limitation,
the RIF cannot be created, and the enslavement attempt is vetoed on the
grounds of the configuration not being offloadable.

The selftest itself however checks vetoing of a different aspect of the
configuration and the bridge does not need to participate in routing
traffic. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.

Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridge in this selftest, thus exempting it from mlxsw router attention.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson 
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

selftests: mlxsw: Add a RIF counter scale test

2022-06-17T09:31:33+00:00

This tests creates as many RIFs as possible, ideally more than there can be
RIF counters (though that is currently only possible on Spectrum-1). It
then tries to enable L3 HW stats on each of the RIFs. It also contains the
traffic test, which tries to run traffic through a log2 of those counters
and checks that the traffic is shown in the counter values.

Like with tc_flower traffic test, take a log2 subset of rules. The logic
behind picking log2 rules is that then every bit of the instantiated item's
number is exercised. This should catch issues whether they happen at the
high end, low end, or somewhere in between.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen 
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Pass target count to cleanup

2022-06-17T09:31:33+00:00

The scale tests are verifying behavior of mlxsw when number of instances of
some resource reaches the ASIC capacity. The number of instances is
referred to as "target" number.

No scale tests so far needed to know this target number to clean up. E.g.
the tc_flower simply removes the clsact qdisc that all the tested filters
are hooked onto, and that takes care of collecting all the filters.

However, for the RIF counter test, which is being added in a future patch,
VLAN netdevices are created. These are created as part of the test, but of
course the cleanup needs to undo them again. For that it needs to know how
many there were. To support this usage, pass the target number to the
cleanup callback.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen 
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Allow skipping a test

2022-06-17T09:31:33+00:00

The scale tests are currently testing two things: that some number of
instances of a given resource can actually be created; and that when an
attempt is made to create more than the supported amount, the failures are
noted and handled gracefully.

Sometimes the scale test depends on more than one resource. In particular,
a following patch will add a RIF counter scale test, which depends on the
number of RIF counters that can be bound, and also on the number of RIFs
that can be created.

When the test is limited by the auxiliary resource and not by the primary
one, there's no point trying to run the overflow test, because it would be
testing exhaustion of the wrong resource.

To support this use case, when the $test_get_target yields 0, skip the test
instead.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen 
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Introduce traffic tests

2022-06-17T09:31:33+00:00

The scale tests are currently testing two things: that some number of
instances of a given resource can actually be created; and that when an
attempt is made to create more than the supported amount, the failures are
noted and handled gracefully.

However the ability to allocate the resource does not mean that the
resource actually works when passing traffic. For that, make it possible
for a given scale to also test traffic.

Traffic test is only run on the positive leg of the scale test (no point
trying to pass traffic when the expected outcome is that the resource will
not be allocated). Traffic tests are opt-in, if a given test does not
expose it, it is not run.

To this end, delay the test cleanup until after the traffic test is run.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata 
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen 
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Update scale target after test setup

2022-06-17T09:31:33+00:00

The scale of each resource is tested in the following manner:

1. The scale target is queried.
2. The test setup is prepared.
3. The test is invoked.

In some cases, the occupancy of a resource changes as part of the second
step, requiring the test to return a scale target that takes this change
into account.

Make this more robust by re-querying the scale target after the second
step.

Another possible solution is to swap the first and second steps, but
when a test needs to be skipped (i.e., scale target is zero), the setup
would have been in vain.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Fix return value

2022-03-03T16:14:01+00:00

The test runs several test cases and is supposed to return an error in
case at least one of them failed.

Currently, the check of the return value of each test case is in the
wrong place, which can result in the wrong return value. For example:

 # TESTS='tc_police' ./resource_scale.sh
 TEST: 'tc_police' [default] 968                                     [FAIL]
         tc police offload count failed
 Error: mlxsw_spectrum: Failed to allocate policer index.
 We have an error talking to the kernel
 Command failed /tmp/tmp.i7Oc5HwmXY:969
 TEST: 'tc_police' [default] overflow 969                            [ OK ]
 ...
 TEST: 'tc_police' [ipv4_max] overflow 969                           [ OK ]

 $ echo $?
 0

Fix this by moving the check to be done after each test case.

Fixes: 059b18e21c63 ("selftests: mlxsw: Return correct error code in resource scale test")
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen 
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata 
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel 
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski