<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-toradex.git/tools/verification/models/wwnr.dot, branch v6.4-rc6</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel for Apalis and Colibri modules</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>rv/monitor: Add the wwnr monitor</title>
<updated>2022-07-30T18:01:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Bristot de Oliveira</name>
<email>bristot@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-29T09:38:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.toradex.cn/cgit/linux-toradex.git/commit/?id=ccc319dcb450d57b7befe924453d06804d83ba73'/>
<id>ccc319dcb450d57b7befe924453d06804d83ba73</id>
<content type='text'>
Per task wakeup while not running (wwnr) monitor.

This model is broken, the reason is that a task can be running in the
processor without being set as RUNNABLE. Think about a task about to
sleep:

1:      set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
2:      schedule();

And then imagine an IRQ happening in between the lines one and two,
waking the task up. BOOM, the wakeup will happen while the task is
running.

Q: Why do we need this model, so?
A: To test the reactors.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/473c0fc39967250fdebcff8b620311c11dccad30.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org

Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck &lt;wim@linux-watchdog.org&gt;
Cc: Guenter Roeck &lt;linux@roeck-us.net&gt;
Cc: Jonathan Corbet &lt;corbet@lwn.net&gt;
Cc: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
Cc: Marco Elver &lt;elver@google.com&gt;
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov &lt;dvyukov@google.com&gt;
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" &lt;paulmck@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni &lt;gpaoloni@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Juri Lelli &lt;juri.lelli@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Clark Williams &lt;williams@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Tao Zhou &lt;tao.zhou@linux.dev&gt;
Cc: Randy Dunlap &lt;rdunlap@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira &lt;bristot@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Per task wakeup while not running (wwnr) monitor.

This model is broken, the reason is that a task can be running in the
processor without being set as RUNNABLE. Think about a task about to
sleep:

1:      set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
2:      schedule();

And then imagine an IRQ happening in between the lines one and two,
waking the task up. BOOM, the wakeup will happen while the task is
running.

Q: Why do we need this model, so?
A: To test the reactors.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/473c0fc39967250fdebcff8b620311c11dccad30.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org

Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck &lt;wim@linux-watchdog.org&gt;
Cc: Guenter Roeck &lt;linux@roeck-us.net&gt;
Cc: Jonathan Corbet &lt;corbet@lwn.net&gt;
Cc: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
Cc: Marco Elver &lt;elver@google.com&gt;
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov &lt;dvyukov@google.com&gt;
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" &lt;paulmck@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni &lt;gpaoloni@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Juri Lelli &lt;juri.lelli@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Clark Williams &lt;williams@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Tao Zhou &lt;tao.zhou@linux.dev&gt;
Cc: Randy Dunlap &lt;rdunlap@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira &lt;bristot@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
