diff options
author | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> | 2012-01-31 16:22:16 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> | 2012-01-31 15:32:24 -0600 |
commit | d28048db190097536aef2be5ee9a736bd7bb92eb (patch) | |
tree | 4f430e29211f01154d0a2da4a103cd5634f1a39c /.mailmap | |
parent | 974f4b86951972b133b4ec5b36956b979dea08d0 (diff) |
Bug with futex requeue piv3.2.2-rt10
I found the problem:
The bug comes from a timed out condition.
TASK 1 TASK 2
------ ------
futex_wait_requeue_pi()
futex_wait_queue_me()
<timed out>
double_lock_hb();
raw_spin_lock(pi_lock);
if (current->pi_blocked_on) {
} else {
current->pi_blocked_on = PI_WAKE_INPROGRESS;
run_spin_unlock(pi_lock);
spin_lock(hb->lock); <-- blocked!
plist_for_each_entry_safe(this) {
rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock();
task_blocks_on_rt_mutex();
BUG_ON(task->pi_blocked_on)!!!!
The BUG_ON() actually has a check for PI_WAKE_INPROGRESS, but the
problem is that, after TASK 1 sets PI_WAKE_INPROGRESS, it then tries to
grab the hb->lock, which it fails to do so. As the hb->lock is a mutex,
it will block and set the "pi_blocked_on" to the hb->lock.
When TASK 2 goes to requeue it, the check for PI_WAKE_INPROGESS fails
because the task1's pi_blocked_on is no longer set to that, but instead,
set to the hb->lock.
We need a way in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() to prevent this.
I just added the below patch, which makes the bug go away. It's a little
ugly (but no more ugly than the pi futex_requeue already is ;-)
-- Steve
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat (limited to '.mailmap')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions