summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org>2016-02-26 22:37:14 +0800
committerLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>2016-03-07 12:02:46 +0700
commita961f9b472de93e770d53b7340a58dbff64b4075 (patch)
treeb5f1523191402b63e554b41c472a642d03147bfe
parent24030d9d9550d1a0b9bfcf6b60da29f7a2bb31cf (diff)
gpiolib: rewrite gpiodev_add_to_list
The original code of gpiodev_add_to_list is not very clear which lead to bugs or compiling warning, reference the following patches: Bugs: 1. Commit ef7c7553039b ("gpiolib: improve overlap check of range of gpio"). 2. Commit 96098df125c0 ("gpiolib: fix chip order in gpio list") Warning: 1. Commit e28ecca6eac4 ("gpio: fix warning about iterator"). of gpio"). There is a off-list discussion about how to improve it consequently. This commit try to follow this by rewriting the whole functions. Tested pass with my gpio mockup driver and test scripts[1]. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg09598.html Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c65
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index bc788b958c7e..1c10bd8f021d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -206,58 +206,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_direction);
*/
static int gpiodev_add_to_list(struct gpio_device *gdev)
{
- struct gpio_device *iterator;
- struct gpio_device *previous = NULL;
-
- if (!gdev->chip)
- return -EINVAL;
+ struct gpio_device *prev, *next;
if (list_empty(&gpio_devices)) {
+ /* initial entry in list */
list_add_tail(&gdev->list, &gpio_devices);
return 0;
}
- list_for_each_entry(iterator, &gpio_devices, list) {
- if (iterator->base >= gdev->base + gdev->ngpio) {
- /*
- * Iterator is the first GPIO chip so there is no
- * previous one
- */
- if (!previous) {
- goto found;
- } else {
- /*
- * We found a valid range(means
- * [base, base + ngpio - 1]) between previous
- * and iterator chip.
- */
- if (previous->base + previous->ngpio
- <= gdev->base)
- goto found;
- }
- }
- previous = iterator;
+ next = list_entry(gpio_devices.next, struct gpio_device, list);
+ if (gdev->base + gdev->ngpio <= next->base) {
+ /* add before first entry */
+ list_add(&gdev->list, &gpio_devices);
+ return 0;
}
- /*
- * We are beyond the last chip in the list and iterator now
- * points to the head.
- * Let iterator point to the last chip in the list.
- */
-
- iterator = list_last_entry(&gpio_devices, struct gpio_device, list);
- if (iterator->base + iterator->ngpio <= gdev->base) {
- list_add(&gdev->list, &iterator->list);
+ prev = list_entry(gpio_devices.prev, struct gpio_device, list);
+ if (prev->base + prev->ngpio <= gdev->base) {
+ /* add behind last entry */
+ list_add_tail(&gdev->list, &gpio_devices);
return 0;
}
- dev_err(&gdev->dev,
- "GPIO integer space overlap, cannot add chip\n");
- return -EBUSY;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(prev, next, &gpio_devices, list) {
+ /* at the end of the list */
+ if (&next->list == &gpio_devices)
+ break;
-found:
- list_add_tail(&gdev->list, &iterator->list);
- return 0;
+ /* add between prev and next */
+ if (prev->base + prev->ngpio <= gdev->base
+ && gdev->base + gdev->ngpio <= next->base) {
+ list_add(&gdev->list, &prev->list);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ dev_err(&gdev->dev, "GPIO integer space overlap, cannot add chip\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
}
/**