diff options
| author | Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com> | 2014-04-24 03:45:56 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> | 2014-07-02 12:06:26 +0200 |
| commit | 8f375cf896c00bf6a66faf6f1e36699ac4f3cbda (patch) | |
| tree | 8bb176ef847f1ccc07366fa5cf9661074a3549be | |
| parent | da2212cb0877874751262d1ea1a33c1c590da921 (diff) | |
ARM: 8037/1: mm: support big-endian page tables
commit 86f40622af7329375e38f282f6c0aab95f3e5f72 upstream.
When enable LPAE and big-endian in a hisilicon board, while specify
mem=384M mem=512M@7680M, will get bad page state:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 180K (c0466000 - c0493000)
BUG: Bad page state in process init pfn:fa442
page:c7749840 count:0 mapcount:-1 mapping: (null) index:0x0
page flags: 0x40000400(reserved)
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 3.10.27+ #66
[<c000f5f0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c000cbc4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c000cbc4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c009e448>] (bad_page+0xd4/0x104)
[<c009e448>] (bad_page+0xd4/0x104) from [<c009e520>] (free_pages_prepare+0xa8/0x14c)
[<c009e520>] (free_pages_prepare+0xa8/0x14c) from [<c009f8ec>] (free_hot_cold_page+0x18/0xf0)
[<c009f8ec>] (free_hot_cold_page+0x18/0xf0) from [<c00b5444>] (handle_pte_fault+0xcf4/0xdc8)
[<c00b5444>] (handle_pte_fault+0xcf4/0xdc8) from [<c00b6458>] (handle_mm_fault+0xf4/0x120)
[<c00b6458>] (handle_mm_fault+0xf4/0x120) from [<c0013754>] (do_page_fault+0xfc/0x354)
[<c0013754>] (do_page_fault+0xfc/0x354) from [<c0008400>] (do_DataAbort+0x2c/0x90)
[<c0008400>] (do_DataAbort+0x2c/0x90) from [<c0008fb4>] (__dabt_usr+0x34/0x40)
The bad pfn:fa442 is not system memory(mem=384M mem=512M@7680M), after debugging,
I find in page fault handler, will get wrong pfn from pte just after set pte,
as follow:
do_anonymous_page()
{
...
set_pte_at(mm, address, page_table, entry);
//debug code
pfn = pte_pfn(entry);
pr_info("pfn:0x%lx, pte:0x%llxn", pfn, pte_val(entry));
//read out the pte just set
new_pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
new_pfn = pte_pfn(*new_pte);
pr_info("new pfn:0x%lx, new pte:0x%llxn", pfn, pte_val(entry));
...
}
pfn: 0x1fa4f5, pte:0xc00001fa4f575f
new_pfn:0xfa4f5, new_pte:0xc00000fa4f5f5f //new pfn/pte is wrong.
The bug is happened in cpu_v7_set_pte_ext(ptep, pte):
An LPAE PTE is a 64bit quantity, passed to cpu_v7_set_pte_ext in the r2 and r3 registers.
On an LE kernel, r2 contains the LSB of the PTE, and r3 the MSB.
On a BE kernel, the assignment is reversed.
Unfortunately, the current code always assumes the LE case,
leading to corruption of the PTE when clearing/setting bits.
This patch fixes this issue much like it has been done already in the
cpu_v7_switch_mm case.
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S | 18 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S index 01a719e18bb0..22e3ad63500c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S @@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ ENTRY(cpu_v7_switch_mm) mov pc, lr ENDPROC(cpu_v7_switch_mm) +#ifdef __ARMEB__ +#define rl r3 +#define rh r2 +#else +#define rl r2 +#define rh r3 +#endif + /* * cpu_v7_set_pte_ext(ptep, pte) * @@ -73,13 +81,13 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_v7_switch_mm) */ ENTRY(cpu_v7_set_pte_ext) #ifdef CONFIG_MMU - tst r2, #L_PTE_VALID + tst rl, #L_PTE_VALID beq 1f - tst r3, #1 << (57 - 32) @ L_PTE_NONE - bicne r2, #L_PTE_VALID + tst rh, #1 << (57 - 32) @ L_PTE_NONE + bicne rl, #L_PTE_VALID bne 1f - tst r3, #1 << (55 - 32) @ L_PTE_DIRTY - orreq r2, #L_PTE_RDONLY + tst rh, #1 << (55 - 32) @ L_PTE_DIRTY + orreq rl, #L_PTE_RDONLY 1: strd r2, r3, [r0] ALT_SMP(W(nop)) ALT_UP (mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 1) @ flush_pte |