diff options
author | Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> | 2009-02-02 18:33:49 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-02-03 16:59:08 -0800 |
commit | dcf6a79dda5cc2a2bec183e50d829030c0972aaa (patch) | |
tree | 557b2867e7c9df361f50b913936d60d4245cf6f8 | |
parent | 5193535517825f9a07967e4868a1103013d0a99d (diff) |
write-back: fix nr_to_write counter
Commit 05fe478dd04e02fa230c305ab9b5616669821dd3 introduced some
@wbc->nr_to_write breakage.
It made the following changes:
1. Decrement wbc->nr_to_write instead of nr_to_write
2. Decrement wbc->nr_to_write _only_ if wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE
3. If synced nr_to_write pages, stop only if if wbc->sync_mode ==
WB_SYNC_NONE, otherwise keep going.
However, according to the commit message, the intention was to only make
change 3. Change 1 is a bug. Change 2 does not seem to be necessary,
and it breaks UBIFS expectations, so if needed, it should be done
separately later. And change 2 does not seem to be documented in the
commit message.
This patch does the following:
1. Undo changes 1 and 2
2. Add a comment explaining change 3 (it very useful to have comments
in _code_, not only in the commit).
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | mm/page-writeback.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index b493db7841dc..dc32dae01e5f 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -1051,13 +1051,22 @@ continue_unlock: } } - if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) { - wbc->nr_to_write--; - if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { - done = 1; - break; - } + if (nr_to_write > 0) + nr_to_write--; + else if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) { + /* + * We stop writing back only if we are not + * doing integrity sync. In case of integrity + * sync we have to keep going because someone + * may be concurrently dirtying pages, and we + * might have synced a lot of newly appeared + * dirty pages, but have not synced all of the + * old dirty pages. + */ + done = 1; + break; } + if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) { wbc->encountered_congestion = 1; done = 1; |