summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>2010-12-09 10:29:00 -0800
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>2011-01-07 13:58:37 -0800
commite67e86ead8aa2d1e36bb547100cfcb8bce964ed2 (patch)
treea9f86954f567327483af50002525b96746ba1d27
parent43d896499a436a46ec95c0eb501d1d1e8aae84a8 (diff)
xhci: Fix issue with port array setup and buggy hosts.
commit f8bbeabc34aa945ab4275abc9a4dfde0aea798ca upstream. Fix two bugs with the port array setup. The first bug will only show up with broken xHCI hosts with Extended Capabilities registers that have duplicate port speed entries for the same port. The idea with the original code was to set the port_array entry to -1 if the duplicate port speed entry said the port was a different speed than the original port speed entry. That would mean that later, the port would not be exposed to the USB core. Unfortunately, I forgot a continue statement, and the port_array entry would just be overwritten in the next line. The second bug would happen if there are conflicting port speed registers (so that some entry in port_array is -1), or one of the hardware port registers was not described in the port speed registers (so that some entry in port_array is 0). The code that sets up the usb2_ports array would accidentally claim those ports. That wouldn't really cause any user-visible issues, but it is a bug. This patch should go into the stable trees that have the port array and USB 3.0 port disabling prevention patches. Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-rw-r--r--drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c25
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index e0ec1a2b07ed..6627a956fa8e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -1677,6 +1677,7 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
xhci->port_array[i] = (u8) -1;
}
/* FIXME: Should we disable the port? */
+ continue;
}
xhci->port_array[i] = major_revision;
if (major_revision == 0x03)
@@ -1755,16 +1756,20 @@ static int xhci_setup_port_arrays(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
return -ENOMEM;
port_index = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < num_ports; i++)
- if (xhci->port_array[i] != 0x03) {
- xhci->usb2_ports[port_index] =
- &xhci->op_regs->port_status_base +
- NUM_PORT_REGS*i;
- xhci_dbg(xhci, "USB 2.0 port at index %u, "
- "addr = %p\n", i,
- xhci->usb2_ports[port_index]);
- port_index++;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ports; i++) {
+ if (xhci->port_array[i] == 0x03 ||
+ xhci->port_array[i] == 0 ||
+ xhci->port_array[i] == -1)
+ continue;
+
+ xhci->usb2_ports[port_index] =
+ &xhci->op_regs->port_status_base +
+ NUM_PORT_REGS*i;
+ xhci_dbg(xhci, "USB 2.0 port at index %u, "
+ "addr = %p\n", i,
+ xhci->usb2_ports[port_index]);
+ port_index++;
+ }
}
if (xhci->num_usb3_ports) {
xhci->usb3_ports = kmalloc(sizeof(*xhci->usb3_ports)*