diff options
| author | roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> | 2009-10-07 00:59:42 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2009-10-13 03:44:07 -0700 |
| commit | 06a96b33aea838b61a6eeccded781a305cf85a12 (patch) | |
| tree | 0779090d15ab5827bede0ffcbfb6b817fd784ed7 | |
| parent | f14d42f314cb45a080bf84ecadf8b9b1eebbe9fd (diff) | |
x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?
Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended
and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'.
In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse
was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/x25/af_x25.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c index ebbfe6bbbff9..e19d811788a5 100644 --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) facilities.throughput > 0xDD) break; if (facilities.reverse && - (facilities.reverse | 0x81)!= 0x81) + (facilities.reverse & 0x81) != 0x81) break; x25->facilities = facilities; rc = 0; |