diff options
author | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2015-07-13 16:58:30 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-08-03 10:57:09 +0200 |
commit | 3b3fdf10a8add87ef0050138d51bfee9ab4983df (patch) | |
tree | 77dadfabe31e5ed2ba47dd0af9009a8da6fecc8b | |
parent | ed2de9f74ecbbf3063d29b2334e7b455d7f35189 (diff) |
locking/pvqspinlock: Order pv_unhash() after cmpxchg() on unlock slowpath
When we unlock in __pv_queued_spin_unlock(), a failed cmpxchg() on the lock
value indicates that we need to take the slow-path and unhash the
corresponding node blocked on the lock.
Since a failed cmpxchg() does not provide any memory-ordering guarantees,
it is possible that the node data could be read before the cmpxchg() on
weakly-ordered architectures and therefore return a stale value, leading
to hash corruption and/or a BUG().
This patch adds an smb_rmb() following the failed cmpxchg operation, so
that the unhashing is ordered after the lock has been checked.
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
[ Added more comments]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150713155830.GL2632@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 23 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h index 489a87884337..ab8b1bb8caa4 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h @@ -244,13 +244,17 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) if (!lp) { /* ONCE */ lp = pv_hash(lock, pn); /* - * lp must be set before setting _Q_SLOW_VAL + * We must hash before setting _Q_SLOW_VAL, such that + * when we observe _Q_SLOW_VAL in __pv_queued_spin_unlock() + * we'll be sure to be able to observe our hash entry. * - * [S] lp = lock [RmW] l = l->locked = 0 - * MB MB - * [S] l->locked = _Q_SLOW_VAL [L] lp + * [S] pn->state + * [S] <hash> [Rmw] l->locked == _Q_SLOW_VAL + * MB RMB + * [RmW] l->locked = _Q_SLOW_VAL [L] <unhash> + * [L] pn->state * - * Matches the cmpxchg() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock(). + * Matches the smp_rmb() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock(). */ if (!cmpxchg(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, _Q_SLOW_VAL)) { /* @@ -306,6 +310,15 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) } /* + * A failed cmpxchg doesn't provide any memory-ordering guarantees, + * so we need a barrier to order the read of the node data in + * pv_unhash *after* we've read the lock being _Q_SLOW_VAL. + * + * Matches the cmpxchg() in pv_wait_head() setting _Q_SLOW_VAL. + */ + smp_rmb(); + + /* * Since the above failed to release, this must be the SLOW path. * Therefore start by looking up the blocked node and unhashing it. */ |