diff options
| author | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2007-02-28 11:05:56 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2007-02-28 11:05:56 -0800 |
| commit | a9948a7e15015e7f2cb602190322b8ebb00c54c8 (patch) | |
| tree | 7a89652bcd2a53e02c25fc17a8fb9fc60ac1e478 | |
| parent | 71599cd1c381d1b5f58c35653ac1d3627c6276db (diff) | |
[TCP]: Fix minisock tcp_create_openreq_child() typo.
On 2/28/07, KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reading TCP minisock code I've found this suspiciously looking
> code fragment:
>
> - 8< -
> struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct sock *newsk = inet_csk_clone(sk, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> if (newsk != NULL) {
> const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
> struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
> struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk);
> struct tcp_sock *newtp;
> - 8< -
>
> The above code initializes newicsk to inet_csk(sk), isn't that supposed
> to be inet_csk(newsk)? As far as I can tell this might leave
> icsk_ack.last_seg_size zero even if we do have received data.
Good catch!
David, please apply the attached patch.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c index 30b1e520ad94..6b5c64f3c925 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, if (newsk != NULL) { const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req); struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req); - struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk); + struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(newsk); struct tcp_sock *newtp; /* Now setup tcp_sock */ |