diff options
| author | Matt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> | 2006-10-03 22:52:05 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> | 2006-10-03 22:52:05 +0200 |
| commit | 992caacf1141b31e94540eb31e0540e3da3a5e25 (patch) | |
| tree | f50d22577c2dd45c31a8fe9e2f952b4a93a44249 /Documentation/block | |
| parent | 2fe0ae78c6975d6fa2fc0c84f2b8944543054105 (diff) | |
Fix typos in Documentation/: 'N'-'P'
This patch fixes typos in various Documentation txts. The patch addresses
some words starting with the letters 'N'-'P'.
Signed-off-by: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/block')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/block/as-iosched.txt | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/block/barrier.txt | 2 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/block/as-iosched.txt b/Documentation/block/as-iosched.txt index 6f47332c883d..e2a66f8143c5 100644 --- a/Documentation/block/as-iosched.txt +++ b/Documentation/block/as-iosched.txt @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ contrast, many write requests may be dispatched to the disk controller at a time during a write batch. It is this characteristic that can make the anticipatory scheduler perform anomalously with controllers supporting TCQ, or with hardware striped RAID devices. Setting the antic_expire -queue paramter (see below) to zero disables this behavior, and the anticipatory -scheduler behaves essentially like the deadline scheduler. +queue parameter (see below) to zero disables this behavior, and the +anticipatory scheduler behaves essentially like the deadline scheduler. When read anticipation is enabled (antic_expire is not zero), reads are dispatched to the disk controller one at a time. diff --git a/Documentation/block/barrier.txt b/Documentation/block/barrier.txt index de3d88edb7f1..a272c3db8094 100644 --- a/Documentation/block/barrier.txt +++ b/Documentation/block/barrier.txt @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ iii. Devices which have queue depth of 1. This is a degenerate case of ii. Just keeping issue order suffices. Ancient SCSI controllers/drives and IDE drives are in this category. -2. Forced flushing to physcial medium +2. Forced flushing to physical medium Again, if you're not gonna do synchronization with disk drives (dang, it sounds even more appealing now!), the reason you use I/O barriers |