summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/networking
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>2018-06-05 09:48:13 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2018-06-13 16:16:42 +0200
commit064257ca9397eac2fcd343866e2afc9abd0b61e0 (patch)
treebf20f76ddca20d3a2462aa5f3370ccc0b53e89dd /Documentation/networking
parent0ae3ff2e4317be219575f48fd4b118b5b39b7a5e (diff)
netdev-FAQ: clarify DaveM's position for stable backports
[ Upstream commit 75d4e704fa8d2cf33ff295e5b441317603d7f9fd ] Per discussion with David at netconf 2018, let's clarify DaveM's position of handling stable backports in netdev-FAQ. This is important for people relying on upstream -stable releases. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/networking')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
index a20b2fae942b..56af008e9258 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
@@ -168,6 +168,15 @@ A: No. See above answer. In short, if you think it really belongs in
dash marker line as described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches to
temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
+Q: Are all networking bug fixes backported to all stable releases?
+
+A: Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the last
+ 2 stable releases. For earlier stable releases, each stable branch maintainer
+ is supposed to take care of them. If you find any patch is missing from an
+ earlier stable branch, please notify stable@vger.kernel.org with either a
+ commit ID or a formal patch backported, and CC Dave and other relevant
+ networking developers.
+
Q: Someone said that the comment style and coding convention is different
for the networking content. Is this true?