diff options
author | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> | 2019-08-21 13:35:16 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> | 2019-08-21 13:35:16 +0200 |
commit | 880e4f93f94677dff02f795352ed4f069ee046b7 (patch) | |
tree | 339be7ef0256eb6586180f014a8bd8f2f3e7fa72 /Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | |
parent | 19d17d935b29f30510874fd34e93357eea0daba2 (diff) | |
parent | d1abaeb3be7b5fa6d7a1fbbd2e14e3310005c4c1 (diff) |
Merge tag 'v5.3-rc5' into devel
Linux 5.3-rc5
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/deprecated.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 14 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst index 49e0f64a3427..053b24a6dd38 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst @@ -119,3 +119,17 @@ array may exceed the remaining memory in the stack segment. This could lead to a crash, possible overwriting sensitive contents at the end of the stack (when built without `CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y`), or overwriting memory adjacent to the stack (when built without `CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y`) + +Implicit switch case fall-through +--------------------------------- +The C language allows switch cases to "fall through" when +a "break" statement is missing at the end of a case. This, +however, introduces ambiguity in the code, as it's not always +clear if the missing break is intentional or a bug. As there +have been a long list of flaws `due to missing "break" statements +<https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/484.html>`_, we no longer allow +"implicit fall-through". In order to identify an intentional fall-through +case, we have adopted the marking used by static analyzers: a comment +saying `/* Fall through */`. Once the C++17 `__attribute__((fallthrough))` +is more widely handled by C compilers, static analyzers, and IDEs, we can +switch to using that instead. |