diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2014-01-02 15:03:50 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2014-02-17 14:56:06 -0800 |
commit | 449f7413c876a229fd95362cc12bc7ade18d0661 (patch) | |
tree | dc34ff86a28876efa47e5232d32058a689b24d7f /Documentation | |
parent | 6e67669678d2d51b2bcf0411aeb629b4353a9880 (diff) |
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: ACCESS_ONCE() provides cache coherence
The ACCESS_ONCE() primitive provides cache coherence, but the
documentation does not clearly state this. This commit therefore upgrades
the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index 102dc19c4119..f9ff060d8320 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt @@ -1249,6 +1249,23 @@ The ACCESS_ONCE() function can prevent any number of optimizations that, while perfectly safe in single-threaded code, can be fatal in concurrent code. Here are some examples of these sorts of optimizations: + (*) The compiler is within its rights to reorder loads and stores + to the same variable, and in some cases, the CPU is within its + rights to reorder loads to the same variable. This means that + the following code: + + a[0] = x; + a[1] = x; + + Might result in an older value of x stored in a[1] than in a[0]. + Prevent both the compiler and the CPU from doing this as follows: + + a[0] = ACCESS_ONCE(x); + a[1] = ACCESS_ONCE(x); + + In short, ACCESS_ONCE() provides cache coherence for accesses from + multiple CPUs to a single variable. + (*) The compiler is within its rights to merge successive loads from the same variable. Such merging can cause the compiler to "optimize" the following code: |