summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>2009-01-06 13:19:28 -0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2009-01-06 13:19:28 -0800
commit9018113649348c689da107166c05d436cd52e7bf (patch)
tree3ae09643fd0cafdfdb9462575213e060b456ac91 /arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c
parent0157141ae29d7a0998b9f040e577895980430d89 (diff)
sparc64: Use unsigned long long for u64.
Andrew Morton wrote: People keep on doing printk("%llu", some_u64); testing it only on x86_64 and this generates a warning storm on powerpc, sparc64, etc. Because they use `long', not `long long'. Quite a few 64-bit architectures are using `long' for their s64/u64 types. We should convert them all to `long long'. Update types.h so we use unsigned long long for u64 and fix all warnings in sparc64 code. Tested with an allnoconfig, defconfig and allmodconfig builds. This patch introduces additional warnings in several drivers. These will be dealt with in separate patches. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c
index 790996428c14..40689ae3c9b0 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void psycho_check_stc_error(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
if (saw_error != 0) {
u64 tagval = stc_tag_buf[i];
u64 lineval = stc_line_buf[i];
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: STC_TAG(%d)[PA(%016lx)VA(%08lx)"
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: STC_TAG(%d)[PA(%016llx)VA(%08llx)"
"V(%d)W(%d)]\n",
pbm->name,
i,
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static void psycho_check_stc_error(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
(tagval & PSYCHO_STCTAG_VPN),
((tagval & PSYCHO_STCTAG_VALID) ? 1 : 0),
((tagval & PSYCHO_STCTAG_WRITE) ? 1 : 0));
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: STC_LINE(%d)[LIDX(%lx)SP(%lx)"
- "LADDR(%lx)EP(%lx)V(%d)FOFN(%d)]\n",
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: STC_LINE(%d)[LIDX(%llx)SP(%llx)"
+ "LADDR(%llx)EP(%llx)V(%d)FOFN(%d)]\n",
pbm->name,
i,
((lineval & PSYCHO_STCLINE_LINDX) >> 21UL),
@@ -179,14 +179,14 @@ static void psycho_dump_iommu_tags_and_data(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
}
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IOMMU TAG(%d)[error(%s) wr(%d) "
- "str(%d) sz(%dK) vpg(%08lx)]\n",
+ "str(%d) sz(%dK) vpg(%08llx)]\n",
pbm->name, i, type_str,
((tag_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_TAG_WRITE) ? 1 : 0),
((tag_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_TAG_STREAM) ? 1 : 0),
((tag_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_TAG_SIZE) ? 64 : 8),
(tag_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_TAG_VPAGE) << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT);
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IOMMU DATA(%d)[valid(%d) cache(%d) "
- "ppg(%016lx)]\n",
+ "ppg(%016llx)]\n",
pbm->name, i,
((data_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_DATA_VALID) ? 1 : 0),
((data_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_DATA_CACHE) ? 1 : 0),
@@ -326,12 +326,12 @@ irqreturn_t psycho_pcierr_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)
"Excessive Retries" :
((error_bits & PSYCHO_PCIAFSR_PPERR) ?
"Parity Error" : "???"))))));
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bytemask[%04lx] UPA_MID[%02lx] was_block(%d)\n",
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bytemask[%04llx] UPA_MID[%02llx] was_block(%d)\n",
pbm->name,
(afsr & PSYCHO_PCIAFSR_BMSK) >> 32UL,
(afsr & PSYCHO_PCIAFSR_MID) >> 25UL,
(afsr & PSYCHO_PCIAFSR_BLK) ? 1 : 0);
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: PCI AFAR [%016lx]\n", pbm->name, afar);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: PCI AFAR [%016llx]\n", pbm->name, afar);
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: PCI Secondary errors [", pbm->name);
reported = 0;
if (afsr & PSYCHO_PCIAFSR_SMA) {