summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/sparc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-10-01 14:04:53 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2013-10-13 15:42:48 -0700
commite6629f15623d31e21775a1e5c28b8d5bd6559506 (patch)
treea1d8fd3cb3c490492367626a83a867872935afef /arch/sparc
parent6b0dcab1d809ad6aab962c8df6ad4cd4e5986fc3 (diff)
powerpc/iommu: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in iommu_init_table()
commit 1cf389df090194a0976dc867b7fffe99d9d490cb upstream. Under heavy (DLPAR?) stress, we tripped this panic() in arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c::iommu_init_table(): page = alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_ATOMIC, get_order(sz)); if (!page) panic("iommu_init_table: Can't allocate %ld bytes\n", sz); Before the panic() we got a page allocation failure for an order-2 allocation. There appears to be memory free, but perhaps not in the ATOMIC context. I looked through all the call-sites of iommu_init_table() and didn't see any obvious reason to need an ATOMIC allocation. Most call-sites in fact have an explicit GFP_KERNEL allocation shortly before the call to iommu_init_table(), indicating we are not in an atomic context. There is some indirection for some paths, but I didn't see any locks indicating that GFP_KERNEL is inappropriate. With this change under the same conditions, we have not been able to reproduce the panic. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/sparc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions