diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2012-05-07 23:35:40 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2012-05-07 23:35:40 -0400 |
| commit | 0d6c4a2e4641bbc556dd74d3aa158c413a972492 (patch) | |
| tree | da944af17682659bb433dc2282dcb48380c14cd1 /arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | |
| parent | 6e06c0e2347ec79d0bd5702b2438fe883f784545 (diff) | |
| parent | 1c430a727fa512500a422ffe4712166c550ea06a (diff) | |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
Conflicts:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans.h
Resolved the iwlwifi conflict with mainline using 3-way diff posted
by John Linville and Stephen Rothwell. In 'net' we added a bug
fix to make iwlwifi report a more accurate skb->truesize but this
conflicted with RX path changes that happened meanwhile in net-next.
In e1000e a conflict arose in the validation code for settings of
adapter->itr. 'net-next' had more sophisticated logic so that
logic was used.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 0a44b90602b0..1c67ca100e4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ * contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap. * * See http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html - * http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html + * and section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6" + * (Publication # 21266 Issue Date: August 1998) * * The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up * the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some @@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) "system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n"); else printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n"); - printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n"); } /* K6 with old style WHCR */ @@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu); /* - * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform, - * so invoke platform-specific handler + * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a + * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some + * IDs of the CPU. */ - if (c->phys_proc_id != node) + if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id) x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node); if (!node_online(node)) { |