summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-03-16 09:55:35 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-03-16 09:55:35 -0700
commit10dc3747661bea9215417b659449bb7b8ed3df2c (patch)
treed943974b4941203a7db2fabe4896852cf0f16bc4 /arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
parent047486d8e7c2a7e8d75b068b69cb67b47364f5d4 (diff)
parentf958ee745f70b60d0e41927cab2c073104bc70c2 (diff)
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
Pull KVM updates from Paolo Bonzini: "One of the largest releases for KVM... Hardly any generic changes, but lots of architecture-specific updates. ARM: - VHE support so that we can run the kernel at EL2 on ARMv8.1 systems - PMU support for guests - 32bit world switch rewritten in C - various optimizations to the vgic save/restore code. PPC: - enabled KVM-VFIO integration ("VFIO device") - optimizations to speed up IPIs between vcpus - in-kernel handling of IOMMU hypercalls - support for dynamic DMA windows (DDW). s390: - provide the floating point registers via sync regs; - separated instruction vs. data accesses - dirty log improvements for huge guests - bugfixes and documentation improvements. x86: - Hyper-V VMBus hypercall userspace exit - alternative implementation of lowest-priority interrupts using vector hashing (for better VT-d posted interrupt support) - fixed guest debugging with nested virtualizations - improved interrupt tracking in the in-kernel IOAPIC - generic infrastructure for tracking writes to guest memory - currently its only use is to speedup the legacy shadow paging (pre-EPT) case, but in the future it will be used for virtual GPUs as well - much cleanup (LAPIC, kvmclock, MMU, PIT), including ubsan fixes" * tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (217 commits) KVM: x86: remove eager_fpu field of struct kvm_vcpu_arch KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Only wipe LRs on vcpu exit arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Reset LRs at boot time arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Do not save an LR known to be empty arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Save maintenance interrupt state only if required arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Avoid accessing ICH registers KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Make GICD_SGIR quicker to hit KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Only wipe LRs on vcpu exit KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Reset LRs at boot time KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Do not save an LR known to be empty KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Move GICH_ELRSR saving to its own function KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Save maintenance interrupt state only if required KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Avoid accessing GICH registers KVM: s390: allocate only one DMA page per VM KVM: s390: enable STFLE interpretation only if enabled for the guest KVM: s390: wake up when the VCPU cpu timer expires KVM: s390: step the VCPU timer while in enabled wait KVM: s390: protect VCPU cpu timer with a seqcount KVM: s390: step VCPU cpu timer during kvm_run ioctl ...
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c222
1 files changed, 222 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..11f76436f74f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
+ * Support KVM gust page tracking
+ *
+ * This feature allows us to track page access in guest. Currently, only
+ * write access is tracked.
+ *
+ * Copyright(C) 2015 Intel Corporation.
+ *
+ * Author:
+ * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
+ * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_page_track.h>
+
+#include "mmu.h"
+
+void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *dont)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++)
+ if (!dont || free->arch.gfn_track[i] !=
+ dont->arch.gfn_track[i]) {
+ kvfree(free->arch.gfn_track[i]);
+ free->arch.gfn_track[i] = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
+int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ unsigned long npages)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++) {
+ slot->arch.gfn_track[i] = kvm_kvzalloc(npages *
+ sizeof(*slot->arch.gfn_track[i]));
+ if (!slot->arch.gfn_track[i])
+ goto track_free;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+track_free:
+ kvm_page_track_free_memslot(slot, NULL);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static inline bool page_track_mode_is_valid(enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+{
+ if (mode < 0 || mode >= KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+ enum kvm_page_track_mode mode, short count)
+{
+ int index, val;
+
+ index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
+
+ val = slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index];
+
+ if (WARN_ON(val + count < 0 || val + count > USHRT_MAX))
+ return;
+
+ slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index] += count;
+}
+
+/*
+ * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that
+ * page will be intercepted.
+ *
+ * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu
+ * or kvm->slots_lock.
+ *
+ * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
+ * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
+ * @gfn: the guest page.
+ * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ */
+void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+ enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+{
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
+ return;
+
+ update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, 1);
+
+ /*
+ * new track stops large page mapping for the
+ * tracked page.
+ */
+ kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
+
+ if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
+ if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+}
+
+/*
+ * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
+ * of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of
+ * kvm_slot_page_track_add_page().
+ *
+ * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu
+ * or kvm->slots_lock.
+ *
+ * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
+ * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
+ * @gfn: the guest page.
+ * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ */
+void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+ enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
+ return;
+
+ update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, -1);
+
+ /*
+ * allow large page mapping for the tracked page
+ * after the tracker is gone.
+ */
+ kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
+}
+
+/*
+ * check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
+ enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+{
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
+ int index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
+ return false;
+
+ return !!ACCESS_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
+}
+
+void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+ head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+ init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->track_notifier_list);
+}
+
+/*
+ * register the notifier so that event interception for the tracked guest
+ * pages can be received.
+ */
+void
+kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+ head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&n->node, &head->track_notifier_list);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * stop receiving the event interception. It is the opposed operation of
+ * kvm_page_track_register_notifier().
+ */
+void
+kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+ head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ hlist_del_rcu(&n->node);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ synchronize_srcu(&head->track_srcu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
+ * finished at this time.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
+ * interested in by itself.
+ */
+void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+ int bytes)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+ int idx;
+
+ head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+ if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+ return;
+
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+ if (n->track_write)
+ n->track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+}