diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-03-16 09:55:35 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-03-16 09:55:35 -0700 |
commit | 10dc3747661bea9215417b659449bb7b8ed3df2c (patch) | |
tree | d943974b4941203a7db2fabe4896852cf0f16bc4 /arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c | |
parent | 047486d8e7c2a7e8d75b068b69cb67b47364f5d4 (diff) | |
parent | f958ee745f70b60d0e41927cab2c073104bc70c2 (diff) |
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
Pull KVM updates from Paolo Bonzini:
"One of the largest releases for KVM... Hardly any generic
changes, but lots of architecture-specific updates.
ARM:
- VHE support so that we can run the kernel at EL2 on ARMv8.1 systems
- PMU support for guests
- 32bit world switch rewritten in C
- various optimizations to the vgic save/restore code.
PPC:
- enabled KVM-VFIO integration ("VFIO device")
- optimizations to speed up IPIs between vcpus
- in-kernel handling of IOMMU hypercalls
- support for dynamic DMA windows (DDW).
s390:
- provide the floating point registers via sync regs;
- separated instruction vs. data accesses
- dirty log improvements for huge guests
- bugfixes and documentation improvements.
x86:
- Hyper-V VMBus hypercall userspace exit
- alternative implementation of lowest-priority interrupts using
vector hashing (for better VT-d posted interrupt support)
- fixed guest debugging with nested virtualizations
- improved interrupt tracking in the in-kernel IOAPIC
- generic infrastructure for tracking writes to guest
memory - currently its only use is to speedup the legacy shadow
paging (pre-EPT) case, but in the future it will be used for
virtual GPUs as well
- much cleanup (LAPIC, kvmclock, MMU, PIT), including ubsan fixes"
* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (217 commits)
KVM: x86: remove eager_fpu field of struct kvm_vcpu_arch
KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features
arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Only wipe LRs on vcpu exit
arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Reset LRs at boot time
arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Do not save an LR known to be empty
arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Save maintenance interrupt state only if required
arm64: KVM: vgic-v3: Avoid accessing ICH registers
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Make GICD_SGIR quicker to hit
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Only wipe LRs on vcpu exit
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Reset LRs at boot time
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Do not save an LR known to be empty
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Move GICH_ELRSR saving to its own function
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Save maintenance interrupt state only if required
KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Avoid accessing GICH registers
KVM: s390: allocate only one DMA page per VM
KVM: s390: enable STFLE interpretation only if enabled for the guest
KVM: s390: wake up when the VCPU cpu timer expires
KVM: s390: step the VCPU timer while in enabled wait
KVM: s390: protect VCPU cpu timer with a seqcount
KVM: s390: step VCPU cpu timer during kvm_run ioctl
...
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c | 222 |
1 files changed, 222 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..11f76436f74f --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +/* + * Support KVM gust page tracking + * + * This feature allows us to track page access in guest. Currently, only + * write access is tracked. + * + * Copyright(C) 2015 Intel Corporation. + * + * Author: + * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> + * + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory. + */ + +#include <linux/kvm_host.h> +#include <asm/kvm_host.h> +#include <asm/kvm_page_track.h> + +#include "mmu.h" + +void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free, + struct kvm_memory_slot *dont) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++) + if (!dont || free->arch.gfn_track[i] != + dont->arch.gfn_track[i]) { + kvfree(free->arch.gfn_track[i]); + free->arch.gfn_track[i] = NULL; + } +} + +int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, + unsigned long npages) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++) { + slot->arch.gfn_track[i] = kvm_kvzalloc(npages * + sizeof(*slot->arch.gfn_track[i])); + if (!slot->arch.gfn_track[i]) + goto track_free; + } + + return 0; + +track_free: + kvm_page_track_free_memslot(slot, NULL); + return -ENOMEM; +} + +static inline bool page_track_mode_is_valid(enum kvm_page_track_mode mode) +{ + if (mode < 0 || mode >= KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX) + return false; + + return true; +} + +static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode, short count) +{ + int index, val; + + index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL); + + val = slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]; + + if (WARN_ON(val + count < 0 || val + count > USHRT_MAX)) + return; + + slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index] += count; +} + +/* + * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that + * page will be intercepted. + * + * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu + * or kvm->slots_lock. + * + * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in. + * @slot: the @gfn belongs to. + * @gfn: the guest page. + * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported. + */ +void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode) +{ + + if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode))) + return; + + update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, 1); + + /* + * new track stops large page mapping for the + * tracked page. + */ + kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn); + + if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE) + if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn)) + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); +} + +/* + * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception + * of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of + * kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(). + * + * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu + * or kvm->slots_lock. + * + * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in. + * @slot: the @gfn belongs to. + * @gfn: the guest page. + * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported. + */ +void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode) +{ + if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode))) + return; + + update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, -1); + + /* + * allow large page mapping for the tracked page + * after the tracker is gone. + */ + kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn); +} + +/* + * check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked. + */ +bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode) +{ + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn); + int index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL); + + if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode))) + return false; + + return !!ACCESS_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]); +} + +void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head; + + head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head; + init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu); + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->track_notifier_list); +} + +/* + * register the notifier so that event interception for the tracked guest + * pages can be received. + */ +void +kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n) +{ + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head; + + head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head; + + spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); + hlist_add_head_rcu(&n->node, &head->track_notifier_list); + spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); +} + +/* + * stop receiving the event interception. It is the opposed operation of + * kvm_page_track_register_notifier(). + */ +void +kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n) +{ + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head; + + head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head; + + spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); + hlist_del_rcu(&n->node); + spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); + synchronize_srcu(&head->track_srcu); +} + +/* + * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is + * finished at this time. + * + * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is + * interested in by itself. + */ +void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new, + int bytes) +{ + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head; + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n; + int idx; + + head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head; + + if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list)) + return; + + idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu); + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node) + if (n->track_write) + n->track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes); + srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx); +} |