x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP

From 5732e1247898d67cbf837585150fe9f68974671d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:16 +0200

Convert x86 to HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.  The only difference in memory
handling is that allocations can't no longer cross node boundaries
whether they're node affine or not, which shouldn't matter at all.

This conversion will enable further simplification of boot memory
handling.

-v2: Fix build failure on !NUMA configurations discovered by hpa.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714094423.GG3455@htj.dyndns.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 824efadc5741..f4a40bdb2e4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -498,13 +498,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 	if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++)
-		memblock_x86_register_active_regions(mi->blk[i].nid,
-					mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-					mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-
-	/* for out of order entries */
-	sort_node_map();
+	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+		struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
+		memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If sections array is gonna be used for pfn -> nid mapping, check
@@ -538,6 +535,8 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 			setup_node_data(nid, start, end);
 	}
 
+	/* Dump memblock with node info and return. */
+	memblock_dump_all();
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -575,7 +574,7 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 	nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 	nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 	memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
-	remove_all_active_ranges();
+	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, MAX_NUMNODES));
 	numa_reset_distance();
 
 	ret = init_func();