diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-01-06 08:43:16 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-01-06 08:43:16 -0800 |
| commit | 7ed40918a386afc2e14a6d3da563ea6d13686c25 (patch) | |
| tree | e180ba59fa65290a12a731aaf304d2aa840f3ffb /arch | |
| parent | 9b847548663ef1039dd49f0eb4463d001e596bc3 (diff) | |
x86: remove bogus 'pci=usepirqmask' suggestion when no irq is defined
This was harmless, but for the case of a device that had no irq
pre-defined we would incorrectly suggest that "usepirqmask" might make a
difference. It never would, and the message was just confusing people.
Reported in the dmesg of Etienne Lorrain.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/i386/pci/irq.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/irq.c b/arch/i386/pci/irq.c index 19e6f4871d1e..ee8e01697d96 100644 --- a/arch/i386/pci/irq.c +++ b/arch/i386/pci/irq.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static int pcibios_lookup_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int assign) * reported by the device if possible. */ newirq = dev->irq; - if (!((1 << newirq) & mask)) { + if (newirq && !((1 << newirq) & mask)) { if ( pci_probe & PCI_USE_PIRQ_MASK) newirq = 0; else printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: IRQ %i for device %s doesn't match PIRQ mask - try pci=usepirqmask\n", newirq, pci_name(dev)); } |