summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>2014-11-13 10:38:57 +0100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2015-01-16 06:59:34 -0800
commit8d33f5146f12be8bffa916cf414772d593807f9f (patch)
tree5a26f66931a87b2299b5ede3f10137a80358f164 /arch
parent3f4ddf1a9297a18b388463f89cee0bd60a064aca (diff)
ARM: mvebu: disable I/O coherency on non-SMP situations on Armada 370/375/38x/XP
commit e55355453600a33bb5ca4f71f2d7214875f3b061 upstream. Enabling the hardware I/O coherency on Armada 370, Armada 375, Armada 38x and Armada XP requires a certain number of conditions: - On Armada 370, the cache policy must be set to write-allocate. - On Armada 375, 38x and XP, the cache policy must be set to write-allocate, the pages must be mapped with the shareable attribute, and the SMP bit must be set Currently, on Armada XP, when CONFIG_SMP is enabled, those conditions are met. However, when Armada XP is used in a !CONFIG_SMP kernel, none of these conditions are met. With Armada 370, the situation is worse: since the processor is single core, regardless of whether CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP is used, the cache policy will be set to write-back by the kernel and not write-allocate. Since solving this problem turns out to be quite complicated, and we don't want to let users with a mainline kernel known to have infrequent but existing data corruptions, this commit proposes to simply disable hardware I/O coherency in situations where it is known not to work. And basically, the is_smp() function of the kernel tells us whether it is OK to enable hardware I/O coherency or not, so this commit slightly refactors the coherency_type() function to return COHERENCY_FABRIC_TYPE_NONE when is_smp() is false, or the appropriate type of the coherency fabric in the other case. Thanks to this, the I/O coherency fabric will no longer be used at all in !CONFIG_SMP configurations. It will continue to be used in CONFIG_SMP configurations on Armada XP, Armada 375 and Armada 38x (which are multiple cores processors), but will no longer be used on Armada 370 (which is a single core processor). In the process, it simplifies the implementation of the coherency_type() function, and adds a missing call to of_node_put(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Fixes: e60304f8cb7bb545e79fe62d9b9762460c254ec2 ("arm: mvebu: Add hardware I/O Coherency support") Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1415871540-20302-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c26
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
index 4e9d58148ca7..c295c10f9217 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
@@ -125,6 +125,29 @@ int __init coherency_init(void)
{
struct device_node *np;
+ /*
+ * The coherency fabric is needed:
+ * - For coherency between processors on Armada XP, so only
+ * when SMP is enabled.
+ * - For coherency between the processor and I/O devices, but
+ * this coherency requires many pre-requisites (write
+ * allocate cache policy, shareable pages, SMP bit set) that
+ * are only meant in SMP situations.
+ *
+ * Note that this means that on Armada 370, there is currently
+ * no way to use hardware I/O coherency, because even when
+ * CONFIG_SMP is enabled, is_smp() returns false due to the
+ * Armada 370 being a single-core processor. To lift this
+ * limitation, we would have to find a way to make the cache
+ * policy set to write-allocate (on all Armada SoCs), and to
+ * set the shareable attribute in page tables (on all Armada
+ * SoCs except the Armada 370). Unfortunately, such decisions
+ * are taken very early in the kernel boot process, at a point
+ * where we don't know yet on which SoC we are running.
+ */
+ if (!is_smp())
+ return 0;
+
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_coherency_table);
if (np) {
struct resource res;
@@ -151,6 +174,9 @@ static int __init coherency_late_init(void)
{
struct device_node *np;
+ if (!is_smp())
+ return 0;
+
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_coherency_table);
if (np) {
bus_register_notifier(&platform_bus_type,