diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-02-12 14:30:53 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-02-12 14:30:53 -0800 |
commit | 8494bcf5b7c4b2416687e233dd34d4c6b6fe5653 (patch) | |
tree | cebb468e170e639ecfd61ddc5ebcba86c21105fa /block | |
parent | 3e12cefbe143b4947171ff92dd50024c4841e291 (diff) | |
parent | b042a3ca949053231950a1b15f31cccca9e305f3 (diff) |
Merge branch 'for-3.20/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull block driver changes from Jens Axboe:
"This contains:
- The 4k/partition fixes for brd from Boaz/Matthew.
- A few xen front/back block fixes from David Vrabel and Roger Pau
Monne.
- Floppy changes from Takashi, cleaning the device file creation.
- Switching libata to use the new blk-mq tagging policy, removing
code (and a suboptimal implementation) from libata. This will
throw you a merge conflict, since a bug in the original libata
tagging code was fixed since this code was branched. Trivial.
From Shaohua.
- Conversion of loop to blk-mq, from Ming Lei.
- Cleanup of the io_schedule() handling in bsg from Peter Zijlstra.
He claims it improves on unreadable code, which will cost him a
beer.
- Maintainer update or NDB, now handled by Markus Pargmann.
- NVMe:
- Optimization from me that avoids a kmalloc/kfree per IO for
smaller (<= 8KB) IO. This cuts about 1% of high IOPS CPU
overhead.
- Removal of (now) dead RCU code, a relic from before NVMe was
converted to blk-mq"
* 'for-3.20/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
xen-blkback: default to X86_32 ABI on x86
xen-blkfront: fix accounting of reqs when migrating
xen-blkback,xen-blkfront: add myself as maintainer
block: Simplify bsg complete all
floppy: Avoid manual call of device_create_file()
NVMe: avoid kmalloc/kfree for smaller IO
MAINTAINERS: Update NBD maintainer
libata: make sata_sil24 use fifo tag allocator
libata: move sas ata tag allocation to libata-scsi.c
libata: use blk taging
NVMe: within nvme_free_queues(), delete RCU sychro/deferred free
null_blk: suppress invalid partition info
brd: Request from fdisk 4k alignment
brd: Fix all partitions BUGs
axonram: Fix bug in direct_access
loop: add blk-mq.h include
block: loop: don't handle REQ_FUA explicitly
block: loop: introduce lo_discard() and lo_req_flush()
block: loop: say goodby to bio
block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r-- | block/bsg.c | 72 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c index 276e869e686c..d214e929ce18 100644 --- a/block/bsg.c +++ b/block/bsg.c @@ -136,42 +136,6 @@ static inline struct hlist_head *bsg_dev_idx_hash(int index) return &bsg_device_list[index & (BSG_LIST_ARRAY_SIZE - 1)]; } -static int bsg_io_schedule(struct bsg_device *bd) -{ - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); - int ret = 0; - - spin_lock_irq(&bd->lock); - - BUG_ON(bd->done_cmds > bd->queued_cmds); - - /* - * -ENOSPC or -ENODATA? I'm going for -ENODATA, meaning "I have no - * work to do", even though we return -ENOSPC after this same test - * during bsg_write() -- there, it means our buffer can't have more - * bsg_commands added to it, thus has no space left. - */ - if (bd->done_cmds == bd->queued_cmds) { - ret = -ENODATA; - goto unlock; - } - - if (!test_bit(BSG_F_BLOCK, &bd->flags)) { - ret = -EAGAIN; - goto unlock; - } - - prepare_to_wait(&bd->wq_done, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock); - io_schedule(); - finish_wait(&bd->wq_done, &wait); - - return ret; -unlock: - spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock); - return ret; -} - static int blk_fill_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, struct bsg_device *bd, fmode_t has_write_perm) @@ -482,6 +446,30 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, return ret; } +static bool bsg_complete(struct bsg_device *bd) +{ + bool ret = false; + bool spin; + + do { + spin_lock_irq(&bd->lock); + + BUG_ON(bd->done_cmds > bd->queued_cmds); + + /* + * All commands consumed. + */ + if (bd->done_cmds == bd->queued_cmds) + ret = true; + + spin = !test_bit(BSG_F_BLOCK, &bd->flags); + + spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock); + } while (!ret && spin); + + return ret; +} + static int bsg_complete_all_commands(struct bsg_device *bd) { struct bsg_command *bc; @@ -492,17 +480,7 @@ static int bsg_complete_all_commands(struct bsg_device *bd) /* * wait for all commands to complete */ - ret = 0; - do { - ret = bsg_io_schedule(bd); - /* - * look for -ENODATA specifically -- we'll sometimes get - * -ERESTARTSYS when we've taken a signal, but we can't - * return until we're done freeing the queue, so ignore - * it. The signal will get handled when we're done freeing - * the bsg_device. - */ - } while (ret != -ENODATA); + io_wait_event(bd->wq_done, bsg_complete(bd)); /* * discard done commands |