diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-02-15 02:19:31 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-03-09 14:41:04 +0100 |
commit | 4cccf7555770b787fa80791a1407a27301f03920 (patch) | |
tree | dc13b9cde7a19c1416707bbb88307572f559b952 /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | |
parent | 57eb832f90e645dcb97d651ad052c0537cc1b3a7 (diff) |
cpufreq: governor: Get rid of the ->gov_check_cpu callback
The way the ->gov_check_cpu governor callback is used by the ondemand
and conservative governors is not really straightforward. Namely, the
governor calls dbs_check_cpu() that updates the load information for
the policy and the invokes ->gov_check_cpu() for the governor.
To get rid of that entanglement, notice that cpufreq_governor_limits()
doesn't need to call dbs_check_cpu() directly. Instead, it can simply
reset the sample delay to 0 which will cause a sample to be taken
immediately. The result of that is practically equivalent to calling
dbs_check_cpu() except that it will trigger a full update of governor
internal state and not just the ->gov_check_cpu() part.
Following that observation, make cpufreq_governor_limits() reset
the sample delay and turn dbs_check_cpu() into a function that will
simply evaluate the load and return the result called dbs_update().
That function can now be called by governors from the routines that
previously were pointed to by ->gov_check_cpu and those routines
can be called directly by each governor instead of dbs_check_cpu().
This way ->gov_check_cpu becomes unnecessary, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c index 0b79f1488be4..707c017f4e67 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c @@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq) * (default), then we try to increase frequency. Else, we adjust the frequency * proportional to load. */ -static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) +static void od_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu); + struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, policy->cpu); struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = dbs_info->cdbs.policy_dbs; - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = policy_dbs->policy; struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data; struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; + unsigned int load = dbs_update(policy); dbs_info->freq_lo = 0; @@ -198,12 +198,16 @@ static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) /* Common NORMAL_SAMPLE setup */ dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE; - if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE) { + /* + * OD_SUB_SAMPLE doesn't make sense if sample_delay_ns is 0, so ignore + * it then. + */ + if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE && policy_dbs->sample_delay_ns > 0) { delay = dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies; __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->freq_lo, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H); } else { - dbs_check_cpu(policy); + od_update(policy); if (dbs_info->freq_lo) { /* Setup timer for SUB_SAMPLE */ dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE; @@ -428,7 +432,6 @@ static struct dbs_governor od_dbs_gov = { .get_cpu_cdbs = get_cpu_cdbs, .get_cpu_dbs_info_s = get_cpu_dbs_info_s, .gov_dbs_timer = od_dbs_timer, - .gov_check_cpu = od_check_cpu, .gov_ops = &od_ops, .init = od_init, .exit = od_exit, |