diff options
| author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2013-07-02 16:36:28 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2013-07-04 13:12:44 +0200 |
| commit | 266c13d767be61a17d8e6f2310b9b7c46278273b (patch) | |
| tree | 924a27434d5846f69b541012494d6ea1f2cb10cf /drivers/cpufreq | |
| parent | f991fae5c6d42dfc5029150b05a78cf3f6c18cc9 (diff) | |
cpufreq: Fix serialization of frequency transitions
Commit 7c30ed ("cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized")
interacts poorly with systems that have a single core freqency for all
cores. On such systems we have a single policy for all cores with
several CPUs. When we do a frequency transition the governor calls the
pre and post change notifiers which causes cpufreq_notify_transition()
per CPU. Since the policy is the same for all of them all CPUs after
the first and the warnings added are generated by checking a per-policy
flag the warnings will be triggered for all cores after the first.
Fix this by allowing notifier to be called for n times. Where n is the number of
cpus in policy->cpus.
Reported-and-tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 6a015ada5285..0937b8d6c2a4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -312,11 +312,12 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, switch (state) { case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE: - if (WARN(policy->transition_ongoing, + if (WARN(policy->transition_ongoing == + cpumask_weight(policy->cpus), "In middle of another frequency transition\n")) return; - policy->transition_ongoing = true; + policy->transition_ongoing++; /* detect if the driver reported a value as "old frequency" * which is not equal to what the cpufreq core thinks is @@ -341,7 +342,7 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, "No frequency transition in progress\n")) return; - policy->transition_ongoing = false; + policy->transition_ongoing--; adjust_jiffies(CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs); pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu", (unsigned long)freqs->new, |