summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>2011-08-25 16:13:55 -0700
committerDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>2012-01-23 11:43:18 -0800
commitd07a74a546981a09ba490936645fbf0d1340b96c (patch)
treeeda5193a28b09fd0f7af994b6762d33b5e8e5b53 /drivers/dma/dmatest.c
parentdcd6c92267155e70a94b3927bce681ce74b80d1f (diff)
dmaengine: fix missing 'cnt' in ?: in dmatest
Hi, On the latest tree my compiler has started giving the warning: drivers/dma/dmatest.c:575:28: warning: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ?true?, suggest explicit middle operand [-Wparentheses] The following patch fixes the missing middle clause with the same fix that Nicolas Ferre used in the similar clauses. (There seems to have been a race between him fixing that and the extra clause going in a little later). I don't actually know the dmatest code/structures, nor do I own any hardware to test it on (assuming it needs a DMA engine); but this patch builds, the existing code is almost certainly wrong and the fix is the same as the corresponding lines above it. (WTH is x=y?:z legal C anyway?) Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma/dmatest.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/dma/dmatest.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
index 2b8661b54eaf..24225f0fdcd8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int dmatest_add_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
}
if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ, dma_dev->cap_mask)) {
cnt = dmatest_add_threads(dtc, DMA_PQ);
- thread_count += cnt > 0 ?: 0;
+ thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0;
}
pr_info("dmatest: Started %u threads using %s\n",