diff options
| author | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> | 2012-10-24 10:30:01 -0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> | 2012-10-25 07:17:18 -0200 |
| commit | 24bef66e74d647aebd34e0bef7693512b7912029 (patch) | |
| tree | ba8c0018022349ba3c9ca2f6deb414df96cc288d /drivers/edac | |
| parent | 479696840239e0cc43efb3c917bdcad2174d2215 (diff) | |
edac: Fix the dimm filling for csrows-based layouts
The driver is currently filling data in a wrong way, on drivers
for csrows-based memory controller, when the first layer is a
csrow.
This is not easily to notice, as, in general, memories are
filed in dual, interleaved, symetric mode, as very few memory
controllers support asymetric modes.
While digging into a bug for i82795_edac driver, the asymetric
mode there is now working, allowing us to fill the machine with
4x1GB ranks at channel 0, and 2x512GB at channel 1:
Channel 0 ranks:
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A0: from page 0x00000000 to 0x0003ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A1: from page 0x00040000 to 0x0007ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A2: from page 0x00080000 to 0x000bffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A3: from page 0x000c0000 to 0x000fffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
Channel 1 ranks:
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B0: from page 0x00100000 to 0x0011ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B1: from page 0x00120000 to 0x0013ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages)
Instead of properly showing the memories as such, before this patch, it
shows the memory layout as:
+-----------------------------------+
| mc0 |
| csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 |
----------+-----------------------------------+
channel1: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
----------+-----------------------------------+
as if both channels were symetric, grouping the DIMMs on a wrong
layout.
After this patch, the memory is correctly represented.
So, for csrows at layers[0], it shows:
+-----------------------------------------------+
| mc0 |
| csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | csrow3 |
----------+-----------------------------------------------+
channel1: | 512 MB | 512 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB |
channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
----------+-----------------------------------------------+
For csrows at layers[1], it shows:
+-----------------------+
| mc0 |
| channel0 | channel1 |
--------+-----------------------+
csrow3: | 1024 MB | 0 MB |
csrow2: | 1024 MB | 0 MB |
--------+-----------------------+
csrow1: | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
csrow0: | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
--------+-----------------------+
So, no matter of what comes first, the information between
channel and csrow will be properly represented.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/edac')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c index d5dc9da7f99f..81eb9fd3f717 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c @@ -416,10 +416,18 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num, dimm->cschannel = chn; /* Increment csrow location */ - row++; - if (row == tot_csrows) { - row = 0; + if (layers[0].is_virt_csrow) { chn++; + if (chn == tot_channels) { + chn = 0; + row++; + } + } else { + row++; + if (row == tot_csrows) { + row = 0; + chn++; + } } /* Increment dimm location */ |