summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>2010-02-05 19:58:36 +0100
committerJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>2010-02-05 19:58:36 +0100
commitb0bcdd3cd0adb85a7686b396ba50493871b1135c (patch)
tree37a96df71be59971d409239b9d2fe2614e142374 /drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
parent197027e6ef830d60e10f76efc8d12bf3b6c35db5 (diff)
hwmon: (w83781d) Request I/O ports individually for probing
Different motherboards have different PNP declarations for W83781D/W83782D chips. Some declare the whole range of I/O ports (8 ports), some declare only the useful ports (2 ports at offset 5) and some declare fancy ranges, for example 4 ports at offset 4. To properly handle all cases, request all ports individually for probing. After we have determined that we really have a W83781D or W83782D chip, the useful port range will be requested again, as a single block. I did not see a board which needs this yet, but I know of one for lm78 driver and I'd like to keep the logic of these two drivers in sync. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c26
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
index 05f9225b6f94..32d4adee73db 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
@@ -1793,17 +1793,17 @@ static int __init
w83781d_isa_found(unsigned short address)
{
int val, save, found = 0;
-
- /* We have to request the region in two parts because some
- boards declare base+4 to base+7 as a PNP device */
- if (!request_region(address, 4, "w83781d")) {
- pr_debug("w83781d: Failed to request low part of region\n");
- return 0;
- }
- if (!request_region(address + 4, 4, "w83781d")) {
- pr_debug("w83781d: Failed to request high part of region\n");
- release_region(address, 4);
- return 0;
+ int port;
+
+ /* Some boards declare base+0 to base+7 as a PNP device, some base+4
+ * to base+7 and some base+5 to base+6. So we better request each port
+ * individually for the probing phase. */
+ for (port = address; port < address + W83781D_EXTENT; port++) {
+ if (!request_region(port, 1, "w83781d")) {
+ pr_debug("w83781d: Failed to request port 0x%x\n",
+ port);
+ goto release;
+ }
}
#define REALLY_SLOW_IO
@@ -1877,8 +1877,8 @@ w83781d_isa_found(unsigned short address)
val == 0x30 ? "W83782D" : "W83781D", (int)address);
release:
- release_region(address + 4, 4);
- release_region(address, 4);
+ for (port--; port >= address; port--)
+ release_region(port, 1);
return found;
}