diff options
author | Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> | 2016-05-04 22:15:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> | 2016-05-04 22:39:17 +0200 |
commit | 6ef91fcca8a8ba3df9810a4cc6cd6a9d3f21bf45 (patch) | |
tree | c49b93903b331c155cdcdde693bb854e53bf9d95 /drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | |
parent | fa96f0cb9b37a1a296d18f7bde63b0910852303e (diff) |
i2c: mux: relax locking of the top i2c adapter during mux-locked muxing
With a i2c topology like the following
GPIO ---| ------ BAT1
| v /
I2C -----+----------+---- MUX
| \
EEPROM ------ BAT2
there is a locking problem with the GPIO controller since it is a client
on the same i2c bus that it muxes. Transfers to the mux clients (e.g. BAT1)
will lock the whole i2c bus prior to attempting to switch the mux to the
correct i2c segment. In the above case, the GPIO device is an I/O expander
with an i2c interface, and since the GPIO subsystem knows nothing (and
rightfully so) about the lockless needs of the i2c mux code, this results
in a deadlock when the GPIO driver issues i2c transfers to modify the
mux.
So, observing that while it is needed to have the i2c bus locked during the
actual MUX update in order to avoid random garbage on the slave side, it
is not strictly a must to have it locked over the whole sequence of a full
select-transfer-deselect mux client operation. The mux itself needs to be
locked, so transfers to clients behind the mux are serialized, and the mux
needs to be stable during all i2c traffic (otherwise individual mux slave
segments might see garbage, or worse).
Introduce this new locking concept as "mux-locked" muxes, and call the
pre-existing mux locking scheme "parent-locked".
Modify the i2c mux locking so that muxes that are "mux-locked" locks only
the muxes on the parent adapter instead of the whole i2c bus when there is
a transfer to the slave side of the mux. This lock serializes transfers to
the slave side of the muxes on the parent adapter.
Add code to i2c-mux-gpio and i2c-mux-pinctrl that checks if all involved
gpio/pinctrl devices have a parent that is an i2c adapter in the same
adapter tree that is muxed, and request a "mux-locked mux" if that is the
case.
Modify the select-transfer-deselect code for "mux-locked" muxes so
that each of the select-transfer-deselect ops locks the mux parent
adapter individually.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 152 |
1 files changed, 139 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c index 5fa8af715e24..8eee98634cda 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c @@ -35,6 +35,25 @@ struct i2c_mux_priv { u32 chan_id; }; +static int __i2c_mux_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, + struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num) +{ + struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data; + struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = priv->muxc; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = muxc->parent; + int ret; + + /* Switch to the right mux port and perform the transfer. */ + + ret = muxc->select(muxc, priv->chan_id); + if (ret >= 0) + ret = __i2c_transfer(parent, msgs, num); + if (muxc->deselect) + muxc->deselect(muxc, priv->chan_id); + + return ret; +} + static int i2c_mux_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num) { @@ -47,7 +66,29 @@ static int i2c_mux_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, ret = muxc->select(muxc, priv->chan_id); if (ret >= 0) - ret = __i2c_transfer(parent, msgs, num); + ret = i2c_transfer(parent, msgs, num); + if (muxc->deselect) + muxc->deselect(muxc, priv->chan_id); + + return ret; +} + +static int __i2c_mux_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, + u16 addr, unsigned short flags, + char read_write, u8 command, + int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data) +{ + struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adap->algo_data; + struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = priv->muxc; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = muxc->parent; + int ret; + + /* Select the right mux port and perform the transfer. */ + + ret = muxc->select(muxc, priv->chan_id); + if (ret >= 0) + ret = parent->algo->smbus_xfer(parent, addr, flags, + read_write, command, size, data); if (muxc->deselect) muxc->deselect(muxc, priv->chan_id); @@ -68,8 +109,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, ret = muxc->select(muxc, priv->chan_id); if (ret >= 0) - ret = parent->algo->smbus_xfer(parent, addr, flags, - read_write, command, size, data); + ret = i2c_smbus_xfer(parent, addr, flags, + read_write, command, size, data); if (muxc->deselect) muxc->deselect(muxc, priv->chan_id); @@ -98,13 +139,50 @@ static unsigned int i2c_mux_parent_classes(struct i2c_adapter *parent) return class; } +static void i2c_mux_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->muxc->parent; + + rt_mutex_lock(&parent->mux_lock); + if (!(flags & I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER)) + return; + i2c_lock_bus(parent, flags); +} + +static int i2c_mux_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->muxc->parent; + + if (!rt_mutex_trylock(&parent->mux_lock)) + return 0; /* mux_lock not locked, failure */ + if (!(flags & I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER)) + return 1; /* we only want mux_lock, success */ + if (parent->trylock_bus(parent, flags)) + return 1; /* parent locked too, success */ + rt_mutex_unlock(&parent->mux_lock); + return 0; /* parent not locked, failure */ +} + +static void i2c_mux_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->muxc->parent; + + if (flags & I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER) + i2c_unlock_bus(parent, flags); + rt_mutex_unlock(&parent->mux_lock); +} + static void i2c_parent_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) { struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data; struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->muxc->parent; - parent->lock_bus(parent, flags); + rt_mutex_lock(&parent->mux_lock); + i2c_lock_bus(parent, flags); } static int i2c_parent_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, @@ -113,7 +191,12 @@ static int i2c_parent_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data; struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->muxc->parent; - return parent->trylock_bus(parent, flags); + if (!rt_mutex_trylock(&parent->mux_lock)) + return 0; /* mux_lock not locked, failure */ + if (parent->trylock_bus(parent, flags)) + return 1; /* parent locked too, success */ + rt_mutex_unlock(&parent->mux_lock); + return 0; /* parent not locked, failure */ } static void i2c_parent_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, @@ -122,9 +205,36 @@ static void i2c_parent_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_mux_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data; struct i2c_adapter *parent = priv->muxc->parent; - parent->unlock_bus(parent, flags); + i2c_unlock_bus(parent, flags); + rt_mutex_unlock(&parent->mux_lock); } +struct i2c_adapter *i2c_root_adapter(struct device *dev) +{ + struct device *i2c; + struct i2c_adapter *i2c_root; + + /* + * Walk up the device tree to find an i2c adapter, indicating + * that this is an i2c client device. Check all ancestors to + * handle mfd devices etc. + */ + for (i2c = dev; i2c; i2c = i2c->parent) { + if (i2c->type == &i2c_adapter_type) + break; + } + if (!i2c) + return NULL; + + /* Continue up the tree to find the root i2c adapter */ + i2c_root = to_i2c_adapter(i2c); + while (i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(i2c_root)) + i2c_root = i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(i2c_root); + + return i2c_root; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_root_adapter); + struct i2c_mux_core *i2c_mux_alloc(struct i2c_adapter *parent, struct device *dev, int max_adapters, int sizeof_priv, u32 flags, @@ -143,6 +253,8 @@ struct i2c_mux_core *i2c_mux_alloc(struct i2c_adapter *parent, muxc->parent = parent; muxc->dev = dev; + if (flags & I2C_MUX_LOCKED) + muxc->mux_locked = true; muxc->select = select; muxc->deselect = deselect; muxc->max_adapters = max_adapters; @@ -176,10 +288,18 @@ int i2c_mux_add_adapter(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, /* Need to do algo dynamically because we don't know ahead * of time what sort of physical adapter we'll be dealing with. */ - if (parent->algo->master_xfer) - priv->algo.master_xfer = i2c_mux_master_xfer; - if (parent->algo->smbus_xfer) - priv->algo.smbus_xfer = i2c_mux_smbus_xfer; + if (parent->algo->master_xfer) { + if (muxc->mux_locked) + priv->algo.master_xfer = i2c_mux_master_xfer; + else + priv->algo.master_xfer = __i2c_mux_master_xfer; + } + if (parent->algo->smbus_xfer) { + if (muxc->mux_locked) + priv->algo.smbus_xfer = i2c_mux_smbus_xfer; + else + priv->algo.smbus_xfer = __i2c_mux_smbus_xfer; + } priv->algo.functionality = i2c_mux_functionality; /* Now fill out new adapter structure */ @@ -192,9 +312,15 @@ int i2c_mux_add_adapter(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, priv->adap.retries = parent->retries; priv->adap.timeout = parent->timeout; priv->adap.quirks = parent->quirks; - priv->adap.lock_bus = i2c_parent_lock_bus; - priv->adap.trylock_bus = i2c_parent_trylock_bus; - priv->adap.unlock_bus = i2c_parent_unlock_bus; + if (muxc->mux_locked) { + priv->adap.lock_bus = i2c_mux_lock_bus; + priv->adap.trylock_bus = i2c_mux_trylock_bus; + priv->adap.unlock_bus = i2c_mux_unlock_bus; + } else { + priv->adap.lock_bus = i2c_parent_lock_bus; + priv->adap.trylock_bus = i2c_parent_trylock_bus; + priv->adap.unlock_bus = i2c_parent_unlock_bus; + } /* Sanity check on class */ if (i2c_mux_parent_classes(parent) & class) |