dm btree: add ref counting ops for the leaves of top level btrees

When using nested btrees, the top leaves of the top levels contain
block addresses for the root of the next tree down.  If we shadow a
shared leaf node the leaf values (sub tree roots) should be incremented
accordingly.

This is only an issue if there is metadata sharing in the top levels.
Which only occurs if metadata snapshots are being used (as is possible
with dm-thinp).  And could result in a block from the thinp metadata
snap being reused early, thus corrupting the thinp metadata snap.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c
index 1b5e13ec7f96..0dee514ba4c5 100644
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c
@@ -249,3 +249,40 @@ int shadow_root(struct shadow_spine *s)
 {
 	return s->root;
 }
+
+static void le64_inc(void *context, const void *value_le)
+{
+	struct dm_transaction_manager *tm = context;
+	__le64 v_le;
+
+	memcpy(&v_le, value_le, sizeof(v_le));
+	dm_tm_inc(tm, le64_to_cpu(v_le));
+}
+
+static void le64_dec(void *context, const void *value_le)
+{
+	struct dm_transaction_manager *tm = context;
+	__le64 v_le;
+
+	memcpy(&v_le, value_le, sizeof(v_le));
+	dm_tm_dec(tm, le64_to_cpu(v_le));
+}
+
+static int le64_equal(void *context, const void *value1_le, const void *value2_le)
+{
+	__le64 v1_le, v2_le;
+
+	memcpy(&v1_le, value1_le, sizeof(v1_le));
+	memcpy(&v2_le, value2_le, sizeof(v2_le));
+	return v1_le == v2_le;
+}
+
+void init_le64_type(struct dm_transaction_manager *tm,
+		    struct dm_btree_value_type *vt)
+{
+	vt->context = tm;
+	vt->size = sizeof(__le64);
+	vt->inc = le64_inc;
+	vt->dec = le64_dec;
+	vt->equal = le64_equal;
+}